The effect of pedaling cadence and power output on mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during submaximal cycle ergometry

C. Russell Hendrix, A. J. Bull, T. J. Housh, S. R. Rana, J. T. Cramer, T. W. Beck, J. P. Weir, M. H. Malek, M. Mielke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of power output and pedaling cadence on the amplitude and mean power frequency (MPF) of the mechanomyographic (MMG) signal during submaximal cycle ergometry. Nine adults (mean age ± SD = 22.7 ± 2.1 yrs) performed an incremental (25 W increase every min) test to exhaustion on an electronically braked cycle ergometer to determine V O2peak and Wpeak. The subjects also performed three, 8 min continuous, constant power output rides (randomly ordered) at 35%, 50%, and 65% Wpeak. The continuous 8 min workbouts were divided into 4 min epochs. The subjects pedaled at either 50 or 70 rev•lmin-1 (randomized) during the first 4 min epoch, then changed to the alternate cadence during the second 4 min epoch. The MMG signal was recorded from the vastus lateralis during the final 10 s of each minute. Two separate two-way [cadence (50 and 70 rev•lmin-1) × % Wpeak (35, 50, and 65)] repeated measures ANOVAs indicated that MMG amplitude followed power output, but not pedaling cadence, whereas MMG MPF was not consistently affected by power output or pedaling cadence. Furthermore, these findings suggested that power output was modulated by motor unit recruitment and not rate coding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-201
Number of pages7
JournalElectromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume48
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008

Fingerprint

Ergometry
Foot
Neurophysiological Recruitment
Quadriceps Muscle
Analysis of Variance

Keywords

  • MMG mean power fraquency (MPF)
  • Mechanomyographic (MMG) amplitude
  • Pedaling cadence (rpm) power output
  • Submaximal cycle ergometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

The effect of pedaling cadence and power output on mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during submaximal cycle ergometry. / Hendrix, C. Russell; Bull, A. J.; Housh, T. J.; Rana, S. R.; Cramer, J. T.; Beck, T. W.; Weir, J. P.; Malek, M. H.; Mielke, M.

In: Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 48, No. 5, 01.06.2008, p. 195-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hendrix, C. Russell ; Bull, A. J. ; Housh, T. J. ; Rana, S. R. ; Cramer, J. T. ; Beck, T. W. ; Weir, J. P. ; Malek, M. H. ; Mielke, M. / The effect of pedaling cadence and power output on mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during submaximal cycle ergometry. In: Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 2008 ; Vol. 48, No. 5. pp. 195-201.
@article{f94be6a3ddae4f7dba8318154f2b2d4b,
title = "The effect of pedaling cadence and power output on mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during submaximal cycle ergometry",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of power output and pedaling cadence on the amplitude and mean power frequency (MPF) of the mechanomyographic (MMG) signal during submaximal cycle ergometry. Nine adults (mean age ± SD = 22.7 ± 2.1 yrs) performed an incremental (25 W increase every min) test to exhaustion on an electronically braked cycle ergometer to determine V O2peak and Wpeak. The subjects also performed three, 8 min continuous, constant power output rides (randomly ordered) at 35{\%}, 50{\%}, and 65{\%} Wpeak. The continuous 8 min workbouts were divided into 4 min epochs. The subjects pedaled at either 50 or 70 rev•lmin-1 (randomized) during the first 4 min epoch, then changed to the alternate cadence during the second 4 min epoch. The MMG signal was recorded from the vastus lateralis during the final 10 s of each minute. Two separate two-way [cadence (50 and 70 rev•lmin-1) × {\%} Wpeak (35, 50, and 65)] repeated measures ANOVAs indicated that MMG amplitude followed power output, but not pedaling cadence, whereas MMG MPF was not consistently affected by power output or pedaling cadence. Furthermore, these findings suggested that power output was modulated by motor unit recruitment and not rate coding.",
keywords = "MMG mean power fraquency (MPF), Mechanomyographic (MMG) amplitude, Pedaling cadence (rpm) power output, Submaximal cycle ergometry",
author = "Hendrix, {C. Russell} and Bull, {A. J.} and Housh, {T. J.} and Rana, {S. R.} and Cramer, {J. T.} and Beck, {T. W.} and Weir, {J. P.} and Malek, {M. H.} and M. Mielke",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "195--201",
journal = "Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "0301-150X",
publisher = "Editions Nauwelaerts SA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of pedaling cadence and power output on mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during submaximal cycle ergometry

AU - Hendrix, C. Russell

AU - Bull, A. J.

AU - Housh, T. J.

AU - Rana, S. R.

AU - Cramer, J. T.

AU - Beck, T. W.

AU - Weir, J. P.

AU - Malek, M. H.

AU - Mielke, M.

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of power output and pedaling cadence on the amplitude and mean power frequency (MPF) of the mechanomyographic (MMG) signal during submaximal cycle ergometry. Nine adults (mean age ± SD = 22.7 ± 2.1 yrs) performed an incremental (25 W increase every min) test to exhaustion on an electronically braked cycle ergometer to determine V O2peak and Wpeak. The subjects also performed three, 8 min continuous, constant power output rides (randomly ordered) at 35%, 50%, and 65% Wpeak. The continuous 8 min workbouts were divided into 4 min epochs. The subjects pedaled at either 50 or 70 rev•lmin-1 (randomized) during the first 4 min epoch, then changed to the alternate cadence during the second 4 min epoch. The MMG signal was recorded from the vastus lateralis during the final 10 s of each minute. Two separate two-way [cadence (50 and 70 rev•lmin-1) × % Wpeak (35, 50, and 65)] repeated measures ANOVAs indicated that MMG amplitude followed power output, but not pedaling cadence, whereas MMG MPF was not consistently affected by power output or pedaling cadence. Furthermore, these findings suggested that power output was modulated by motor unit recruitment and not rate coding.

AB - The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of power output and pedaling cadence on the amplitude and mean power frequency (MPF) of the mechanomyographic (MMG) signal during submaximal cycle ergometry. Nine adults (mean age ± SD = 22.7 ± 2.1 yrs) performed an incremental (25 W increase every min) test to exhaustion on an electronically braked cycle ergometer to determine V O2peak and Wpeak. The subjects also performed three, 8 min continuous, constant power output rides (randomly ordered) at 35%, 50%, and 65% Wpeak. The continuous 8 min workbouts were divided into 4 min epochs. The subjects pedaled at either 50 or 70 rev•lmin-1 (randomized) during the first 4 min epoch, then changed to the alternate cadence during the second 4 min epoch. The MMG signal was recorded from the vastus lateralis during the final 10 s of each minute. Two separate two-way [cadence (50 and 70 rev•lmin-1) × % Wpeak (35, 50, and 65)] repeated measures ANOVAs indicated that MMG amplitude followed power output, but not pedaling cadence, whereas MMG MPF was not consistently affected by power output or pedaling cadence. Furthermore, these findings suggested that power output was modulated by motor unit recruitment and not rate coding.

KW - MMG mean power fraquency (MPF)

KW - Mechanomyographic (MMG) amplitude

KW - Pedaling cadence (rpm) power output

KW - Submaximal cycle ergometry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48349105167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48349105167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18754528

AN - SCOPUS:48349105167

VL - 48

SP - 195

EP - 201

JO - Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 0301-150X

IS - 5

ER -