The effect of background cuing on prey detection

Henry Kono, Pamela J. Reid, Alan C Kamil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies of prey detection have typically focused on how search image affects the capture of cryptic items. This study also considers how background vegetation influences cryptic prey detection. Blue jays, Cyanocitta cristata, searched digitized images for two Catocala moths: C. ilia, which is cryptic on oak, and C. relicta, which is cryptic on birch. Some images contained moths while others did not. The ability of blue jays to detect prey during repeated presentations of one prey type within a session was compared with their performance during randomly alternating presentations of both prey types within a session to examine search-image formation under two background conditions (informative and ambiguous). In the informative background condition, both trees in the image were of the same species and therefore, the background was a reliable indicator of which prey type might be present. In the ambiguous background condition, there was one tree of each species in the image and either prey type could be present. The results indicate that: (1) a search-image effect was observed only for the more cryptic prey type and only when the background was informative; (2) as accuracy on prey images (those with moths) increased, response latency remained unchanged; (3) performance on nonprey images (those without moths) was primarily determined by the difficulty of searching the background and not by the prey type in the accompanying prey images; and (4) search-image effects disappeared with extended practice. These results suggest that the ability to detect prey is influenced by background and that the presence of either multiple backgrounds or multiple prey types interferes with search-image formation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)963-972
Number of pages10
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume56
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

moths
moth
Betula
Quercus
vegetation
detection
effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

The effect of background cuing on prey detection. / Kono, Henry; Reid, Pamela J.; Kamil, Alan C.

In: Animal Behaviour, Vol. 56, No. 4, 01.01.1998, p. 963-972.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kono, H, Reid, PJ & Kamil, AC 1998, 'The effect of background cuing on prey detection', Animal Behaviour, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 963-972. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1998.0847
Kono, Henry ; Reid, Pamela J. ; Kamil, Alan C. / The effect of background cuing on prey detection. In: Animal Behaviour. 1998 ; Vol. 56, No. 4. pp. 963-972.
@article{f810bb5f94dc4787b4bfb93a4cbdac3a,
title = "The effect of background cuing on prey detection",
abstract = "Studies of prey detection have typically focused on how search image affects the capture of cryptic items. This study also considers how background vegetation influences cryptic prey detection. Blue jays, Cyanocitta cristata, searched digitized images for two Catocala moths: C. ilia, which is cryptic on oak, and C. relicta, which is cryptic on birch. Some images contained moths while others did not. The ability of blue jays to detect prey during repeated presentations of one prey type within a session was compared with their performance during randomly alternating presentations of both prey types within a session to examine search-image formation under two background conditions (informative and ambiguous). In the informative background condition, both trees in the image were of the same species and therefore, the background was a reliable indicator of which prey type might be present. In the ambiguous background condition, there was one tree of each species in the image and either prey type could be present. The results indicate that: (1) a search-image effect was observed only for the more cryptic prey type and only when the background was informative; (2) as accuracy on prey images (those with moths) increased, response latency remained unchanged; (3) performance on nonprey images (those without moths) was primarily determined by the difficulty of searching the background and not by the prey type in the accompanying prey images; and (4) search-image effects disappeared with extended practice. These results suggest that the ability to detect prey is influenced by background and that the presence of either multiple backgrounds or multiple prey types interferes with search-image formation.",
author = "Henry Kono and Reid, {Pamela J.} and Kamil, {Alan C}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1006/anbe.1998.0847",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "963--972",
journal = "Animal Behaviour",
issn = "0003-3472",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of background cuing on prey detection

AU - Kono, Henry

AU - Reid, Pamela J.

AU - Kamil, Alan C

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Studies of prey detection have typically focused on how search image affects the capture of cryptic items. This study also considers how background vegetation influences cryptic prey detection. Blue jays, Cyanocitta cristata, searched digitized images for two Catocala moths: C. ilia, which is cryptic on oak, and C. relicta, which is cryptic on birch. Some images contained moths while others did not. The ability of blue jays to detect prey during repeated presentations of one prey type within a session was compared with their performance during randomly alternating presentations of both prey types within a session to examine search-image formation under two background conditions (informative and ambiguous). In the informative background condition, both trees in the image were of the same species and therefore, the background was a reliable indicator of which prey type might be present. In the ambiguous background condition, there was one tree of each species in the image and either prey type could be present. The results indicate that: (1) a search-image effect was observed only for the more cryptic prey type and only when the background was informative; (2) as accuracy on prey images (those with moths) increased, response latency remained unchanged; (3) performance on nonprey images (those without moths) was primarily determined by the difficulty of searching the background and not by the prey type in the accompanying prey images; and (4) search-image effects disappeared with extended practice. These results suggest that the ability to detect prey is influenced by background and that the presence of either multiple backgrounds or multiple prey types interferes with search-image formation.

AB - Studies of prey detection have typically focused on how search image affects the capture of cryptic items. This study also considers how background vegetation influences cryptic prey detection. Blue jays, Cyanocitta cristata, searched digitized images for two Catocala moths: C. ilia, which is cryptic on oak, and C. relicta, which is cryptic on birch. Some images contained moths while others did not. The ability of blue jays to detect prey during repeated presentations of one prey type within a session was compared with their performance during randomly alternating presentations of both prey types within a session to examine search-image formation under two background conditions (informative and ambiguous). In the informative background condition, both trees in the image were of the same species and therefore, the background was a reliable indicator of which prey type might be present. In the ambiguous background condition, there was one tree of each species in the image and either prey type could be present. The results indicate that: (1) a search-image effect was observed only for the more cryptic prey type and only when the background was informative; (2) as accuracy on prey images (those with moths) increased, response latency remained unchanged; (3) performance on nonprey images (those without moths) was primarily determined by the difficulty of searching the background and not by the prey type in the accompanying prey images; and (4) search-image effects disappeared with extended practice. These results suggest that the ability to detect prey is influenced by background and that the presence of either multiple backgrounds or multiple prey types interferes with search-image formation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031794249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031794249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/anbe.1998.0847

DO - 10.1006/anbe.1998.0847

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 963

EP - 972

JO - Animal Behaviour

JF - Animal Behaviour

SN - 0003-3472

IS - 4

ER -