The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

474 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the need to assess the ecological validity of jury simulation research before generalizing from simulations to the behavior of real jurors, surprisingly little jury research has directly addressed issues of validity. The present paper reviews the extant research on two aspects of the validity question - specifically, research that has compared different samples of mock jurors, and research that has manipulated the medium of trial presentation. In addition, jury simulation research published in the first 20 years of Law and Human Behavior is analyzed with respect to these variables. The majority of simulations used student-jurors and presented the trial in written form. Additionally, the methodology of simulation research has actually become less realistic over time. However, this trend is not necessarily cause for concern, as a review of the literature reveals little research that has obtained differences between different mock juror samples or different trial media.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-91
Number of pages17
JournalLaw and human behavior
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 30 1999

Fingerprint

simulation
Research
Simulation
Juries
Jurors
Students
cause
Law
methodology
trend
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Cite this

The ecological validity of jury simulations : Is the jury still out? / Bornstein, Brian H.

In: Law and human behavior, Vol. 23, No. 1, 30.03.1999, p. 75-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{a1f506ea6a624c2985a6346a2bbef793,
title = "The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?",
abstract = "Despite the need to assess the ecological validity of jury simulation research before generalizing from simulations to the behavior of real jurors, surprisingly little jury research has directly addressed issues of validity. The present paper reviews the extant research on two aspects of the validity question - specifically, research that has compared different samples of mock jurors, and research that has manipulated the medium of trial presentation. In addition, jury simulation research published in the first 20 years of Law and Human Behavior is analyzed with respect to these variables. The majority of simulations used student-jurors and presented the trial in written form. Additionally, the methodology of simulation research has actually become less realistic over time. However, this trend is not necessarily cause for concern, as a review of the literature reveals little research that has obtained differences between different mock juror samples or different trial media.",
author = "Bornstein, {Brian H.}",
year = "1999",
month = "3",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1023/A:1022326807441",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "75--91",
journal = "Law and Human Behavior",
issn = "0147-7307",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ecological validity of jury simulations

T2 - Is the jury still out?

AU - Bornstein, Brian H.

PY - 1999/3/30

Y1 - 1999/3/30

N2 - Despite the need to assess the ecological validity of jury simulation research before generalizing from simulations to the behavior of real jurors, surprisingly little jury research has directly addressed issues of validity. The present paper reviews the extant research on two aspects of the validity question - specifically, research that has compared different samples of mock jurors, and research that has manipulated the medium of trial presentation. In addition, jury simulation research published in the first 20 years of Law and Human Behavior is analyzed with respect to these variables. The majority of simulations used student-jurors and presented the trial in written form. Additionally, the methodology of simulation research has actually become less realistic over time. However, this trend is not necessarily cause for concern, as a review of the literature reveals little research that has obtained differences between different mock juror samples or different trial media.

AB - Despite the need to assess the ecological validity of jury simulation research before generalizing from simulations to the behavior of real jurors, surprisingly little jury research has directly addressed issues of validity. The present paper reviews the extant research on two aspects of the validity question - specifically, research that has compared different samples of mock jurors, and research that has manipulated the medium of trial presentation. In addition, jury simulation research published in the first 20 years of Law and Human Behavior is analyzed with respect to these variables. The majority of simulations used student-jurors and presented the trial in written form. Additionally, the methodology of simulation research has actually become less realistic over time. However, this trend is not necessarily cause for concern, as a review of the literature reveals little research that has obtained differences between different mock juror samples or different trial media.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032991953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032991953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1022326807441

DO - 10.1023/A:1022326807441

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0032991953

VL - 23

SP - 75

EP - 91

JO - Law and Human Behavior

JF - Law and Human Behavior

SN - 0147-7307

IS - 1

ER -