The Double Helix: Applying an Ethic of Care to the Duty to Warn Genetic Relatives of Genetic Information

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Genetic testing reveals information about a patient's health status and predictions about the patient's future wellness, while also potentially disclosing health information relevant to other family members. With the increasing availability and affordability of genetic testing and the integration of genetics into mainstream medicine, the importance of clarifying the scope of confidentiality and the rules regarding disclosure of genetic findings to genetic relatives is prime. The United Nations International Declaration on Human Genetic Data urges an appreciation for principles of equality, justice, solidarity and responsibility in the context of genetic testing, including a commitment to honoring the privacy and security of the person tested. Considering this global mandate and recent professional statements in the context of a legal amendment to patient privacy policies in Australia, a fresh scrutiny of the legal history of a physician's duty to warn is warranted. This article inquiries whether there may be anything ethically or socially amiss with a potential future recommendation for health professionals or patients to universally disclose particular cancer predisposition genetic diagnosis to genetic family members. While much of the discussion remains applicable to all genetic diagnosis, the article focuses on the practice of disclosure within the context of BRCA1/2 diagnosis. An 'ethic of care' interpretation of legal tradition and current practice will serve to reconcile law and medical policy on the issue of physician disclosure of genetic results to family members without patient consent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-187
Number of pages7
JournalBioethics
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Duty to Warn
Ethics
moral philosophy
Disclosure
Genetic Testing
Privacy
Physicians
family member
United Nations
Confidentiality
Health
Medical Genetics
Social Justice
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Health Status
privacy
History
Medicine
Ethics of Care
Genetic Information

Keywords

  • Confidentiality
  • Duty to warn
  • Ethic of care
  • Genetic testing
  • Privacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Philosophy
  • Health Policy

Cite this

The Double Helix : Applying an Ethic of Care to the Duty to Warn Genetic Relatives of Genetic Information. / Weaver, Meaghann.

In: Bioethics, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.03.2016, p. 181-187.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{076ea66e871b49f5a307f54a895381ad,
title = "The Double Helix: Applying an Ethic of Care to the Duty to Warn Genetic Relatives of Genetic Information",
abstract = "Genetic testing reveals information about a patient's health status and predictions about the patient's future wellness, while also potentially disclosing health information relevant to other family members. With the increasing availability and affordability of genetic testing and the integration of genetics into mainstream medicine, the importance of clarifying the scope of confidentiality and the rules regarding disclosure of genetic findings to genetic relatives is prime. The United Nations International Declaration on Human Genetic Data urges an appreciation for principles of equality, justice, solidarity and responsibility in the context of genetic testing, including a commitment to honoring the privacy and security of the person tested. Considering this global mandate and recent professional statements in the context of a legal amendment to patient privacy policies in Australia, a fresh scrutiny of the legal history of a physician's duty to warn is warranted. This article inquiries whether there may be anything ethically or socially amiss with a potential future recommendation for health professionals or patients to universally disclose particular cancer predisposition genetic diagnosis to genetic family members. While much of the discussion remains applicable to all genetic diagnosis, the article focuses on the practice of disclosure within the context of BRCA1/2 diagnosis. An 'ethic of care' interpretation of legal tradition and current practice will serve to reconcile law and medical policy on the issue of physician disclosure of genetic results to family members without patient consent.",
keywords = "Confidentiality, Duty to warn, Ethic of care, Genetic testing, Privacy",
author = "Meaghann Weaver",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/bioe.12176",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "181--187",
journal = "Bioethics",
issn = "0269-9702",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Double Helix

T2 - Applying an Ethic of Care to the Duty to Warn Genetic Relatives of Genetic Information

AU - Weaver, Meaghann

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Genetic testing reveals information about a patient's health status and predictions about the patient's future wellness, while also potentially disclosing health information relevant to other family members. With the increasing availability and affordability of genetic testing and the integration of genetics into mainstream medicine, the importance of clarifying the scope of confidentiality and the rules regarding disclosure of genetic findings to genetic relatives is prime. The United Nations International Declaration on Human Genetic Data urges an appreciation for principles of equality, justice, solidarity and responsibility in the context of genetic testing, including a commitment to honoring the privacy and security of the person tested. Considering this global mandate and recent professional statements in the context of a legal amendment to patient privacy policies in Australia, a fresh scrutiny of the legal history of a physician's duty to warn is warranted. This article inquiries whether there may be anything ethically or socially amiss with a potential future recommendation for health professionals or patients to universally disclose particular cancer predisposition genetic diagnosis to genetic family members. While much of the discussion remains applicable to all genetic diagnosis, the article focuses on the practice of disclosure within the context of BRCA1/2 diagnosis. An 'ethic of care' interpretation of legal tradition and current practice will serve to reconcile law and medical policy on the issue of physician disclosure of genetic results to family members without patient consent.

AB - Genetic testing reveals information about a patient's health status and predictions about the patient's future wellness, while also potentially disclosing health information relevant to other family members. With the increasing availability and affordability of genetic testing and the integration of genetics into mainstream medicine, the importance of clarifying the scope of confidentiality and the rules regarding disclosure of genetic findings to genetic relatives is prime. The United Nations International Declaration on Human Genetic Data urges an appreciation for principles of equality, justice, solidarity and responsibility in the context of genetic testing, including a commitment to honoring the privacy and security of the person tested. Considering this global mandate and recent professional statements in the context of a legal amendment to patient privacy policies in Australia, a fresh scrutiny of the legal history of a physician's duty to warn is warranted. This article inquiries whether there may be anything ethically or socially amiss with a potential future recommendation for health professionals or patients to universally disclose particular cancer predisposition genetic diagnosis to genetic family members. While much of the discussion remains applicable to all genetic diagnosis, the article focuses on the practice of disclosure within the context of BRCA1/2 diagnosis. An 'ethic of care' interpretation of legal tradition and current practice will serve to reconcile law and medical policy on the issue of physician disclosure of genetic results to family members without patient consent.

KW - Confidentiality

KW - Duty to warn

KW - Ethic of care

KW - Genetic testing

KW - Privacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958762609&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958762609&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/bioe.12176

DO - 10.1111/bioe.12176

M3 - Article

C2 - 26194147

AN - SCOPUS:84958762609

VL - 30

SP - 181

EP - 187

JO - Bioethics

JF - Bioethics

SN - 0269-9702

IS - 3

ER -