The differential ability of asparagine and glutamine in promoting the closed/active enzyme conformation rationalizes the Wolinella succinogenes L-asparaginase substrate specificity

Hien Anh Nguyen, Donald L. Durden, Arnon Lavie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many side effects of current FDA-approved L-asparaginases have been related to their secondary L-glutaminase activity. The Wolinella succinogenes L-asparaginase (WoA) has been reported to be L-glutaminase free, suggesting it would have fewer side effects. Unexpectedly, the WoA variant with a proline at position 121 (WoA-P 121) was found to have L-glutaminase activity in contrast to Uniprot entry P50286 (WoA-S 121) that has a serine residue at this position. Towards understanding how this residue impacts the L-glutaminase property, kinetic analysis was coupled with crystal structure determination of these WoA variants. WoA-S 121 was confirmed to have much lower L-glutaminase activity than WoA-P 121, yet both showed comparable L-asparaginase activity. Structures of the WoA variants in complex with L-aspartic acid versus L-glutamic acid provide insights into their differential substrate selectivity. Structural analysis suggests a mechanism by which residue 121 impacts the conformation of the conserved tyrosine 27, a component of the catalytically-important flexible N-terminal loop. Surprisingly, we could fully model this loop in either its open or closed conformations, revealing the roles of specific residues of an evolutionary conserved motif among this L-asparaginase family. Together, this work showcases critical residues that influence the ability of the flexible N-terminal loop for adopting its active conformation, thereby effecting substrate specificity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number41643
JournalScientific reports
Volume7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 31 2017

Fingerprint

Glutaminase
Asparaginase
Asparagine
Glutamine
Conformations
Substrates
Enzymes
Proline
Aspartic Acid
Structural analysis
Serine
Tyrosine
Glutamic Acid
Crystal structure
Kinetics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

The differential ability of asparagine and glutamine in promoting the closed/active enzyme conformation rationalizes the Wolinella succinogenes L-asparaginase substrate specificity. / Nguyen, Hien Anh; Durden, Donald L.; Lavie, Arnon.

In: Scientific reports, Vol. 7, 41643, 31.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8f75c420ee924f37b43ec6215dc4b808,
title = "The differential ability of asparagine and glutamine in promoting the closed/active enzyme conformation rationalizes the Wolinella succinogenes L-asparaginase substrate specificity",
abstract = "Many side effects of current FDA-approved L-asparaginases have been related to their secondary L-glutaminase activity. The Wolinella succinogenes L-asparaginase (WoA) has been reported to be L-glutaminase free, suggesting it would have fewer side effects. Unexpectedly, the WoA variant with a proline at position 121 (WoA-P 121) was found to have L-glutaminase activity in contrast to Uniprot entry P50286 (WoA-S 121) that has a serine residue at this position. Towards understanding how this residue impacts the L-glutaminase property, kinetic analysis was coupled with crystal structure determination of these WoA variants. WoA-S 121 was confirmed to have much lower L-glutaminase activity than WoA-P 121, yet both showed comparable L-asparaginase activity. Structures of the WoA variants in complex with L-aspartic acid versus L-glutamic acid provide insights into their differential substrate selectivity. Structural analysis suggests a mechanism by which residue 121 impacts the conformation of the conserved tyrosine 27, a component of the catalytically-important flexible N-terminal loop. Surprisingly, we could fully model this loop in either its open or closed conformations, revealing the roles of specific residues of an evolutionary conserved motif among this L-asparaginase family. Together, this work showcases critical residues that influence the ability of the flexible N-terminal loop for adopting its active conformation, thereby effecting substrate specificity.",
author = "Nguyen, {Hien Anh} and Durden, {Donald L.} and Arnon Lavie",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1038/srep41643",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The differential ability of asparagine and glutamine in promoting the closed/active enzyme conformation rationalizes the Wolinella succinogenes L-asparaginase substrate specificity

AU - Nguyen, Hien Anh

AU - Durden, Donald L.

AU - Lavie, Arnon

PY - 2017/1/31

Y1 - 2017/1/31

N2 - Many side effects of current FDA-approved L-asparaginases have been related to their secondary L-glutaminase activity. The Wolinella succinogenes L-asparaginase (WoA) has been reported to be L-glutaminase free, suggesting it would have fewer side effects. Unexpectedly, the WoA variant with a proline at position 121 (WoA-P 121) was found to have L-glutaminase activity in contrast to Uniprot entry P50286 (WoA-S 121) that has a serine residue at this position. Towards understanding how this residue impacts the L-glutaminase property, kinetic analysis was coupled with crystal structure determination of these WoA variants. WoA-S 121 was confirmed to have much lower L-glutaminase activity than WoA-P 121, yet both showed comparable L-asparaginase activity. Structures of the WoA variants in complex with L-aspartic acid versus L-glutamic acid provide insights into their differential substrate selectivity. Structural analysis suggests a mechanism by which residue 121 impacts the conformation of the conserved tyrosine 27, a component of the catalytically-important flexible N-terminal loop. Surprisingly, we could fully model this loop in either its open or closed conformations, revealing the roles of specific residues of an evolutionary conserved motif among this L-asparaginase family. Together, this work showcases critical residues that influence the ability of the flexible N-terminal loop for adopting its active conformation, thereby effecting substrate specificity.

AB - Many side effects of current FDA-approved L-asparaginases have been related to their secondary L-glutaminase activity. The Wolinella succinogenes L-asparaginase (WoA) has been reported to be L-glutaminase free, suggesting it would have fewer side effects. Unexpectedly, the WoA variant with a proline at position 121 (WoA-P 121) was found to have L-glutaminase activity in contrast to Uniprot entry P50286 (WoA-S 121) that has a serine residue at this position. Towards understanding how this residue impacts the L-glutaminase property, kinetic analysis was coupled with crystal structure determination of these WoA variants. WoA-S 121 was confirmed to have much lower L-glutaminase activity than WoA-P 121, yet both showed comparable L-asparaginase activity. Structures of the WoA variants in complex with L-aspartic acid versus L-glutamic acid provide insights into their differential substrate selectivity. Structural analysis suggests a mechanism by which residue 121 impacts the conformation of the conserved tyrosine 27, a component of the catalytically-important flexible N-terminal loop. Surprisingly, we could fully model this loop in either its open or closed conformations, revealing the roles of specific residues of an evolutionary conserved motif among this L-asparaginase family. Together, this work showcases critical residues that influence the ability of the flexible N-terminal loop for adopting its active conformation, thereby effecting substrate specificity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011256441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011256441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/srep41643

DO - 10.1038/srep41643

M3 - Article

C2 - 28139703

AN - SCOPUS:85011256441

VL - 7

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

M1 - 41643

ER -