The difference between desistance from sexual offending and not reoffending

Brooke N. Cooley, Lisa L. Sample

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Scholars have generally relied on a lack of sexual recidivism as an indicator of desistance, which can be misleading because desistance and the lack of recidivism are two distinct constructs and should be measured as such. Desistance includes gradual cognitive and affective transformation, whereas the lack of reoffending could be a function of several factors including the natural aging process, the lack of opportunity, or increases in social bonds. This research conducted a comparative case study analysis to highlight how desistance and the lack of reoffending differentiate within sexual offending. Our results demonstrate a desistance pathway in one case and a simple lack of reoffending in another. Our findings can be used to expand our theoretic understanding of desistance as more than a lack of reoffending.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)483-503
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Crime and Justice
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 20 2018

Fingerprint

lack

Keywords

  • Desistance
  • cognitive and affective transformation
  • sexual offending

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

The difference between desistance from sexual offending and not reoffending. / Cooley, Brooke N.; Sample, Lisa L.

In: Journal of Crime and Justice, Vol. 41, No. 5, 20.10.2018, p. 483-503.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cbe3c447fd004e7ba47f372bdc5ef1e6,
title = "The difference between desistance from sexual offending and not reoffending",
abstract = "Scholars have generally relied on a lack of sexual recidivism as an indicator of desistance, which can be misleading because desistance and the lack of recidivism are two distinct constructs and should be measured as such. Desistance includes gradual cognitive and affective transformation, whereas the lack of reoffending could be a function of several factors including the natural aging process, the lack of opportunity, or increases in social bonds. This research conducted a comparative case study analysis to highlight how desistance and the lack of reoffending differentiate within sexual offending. Our results demonstrate a desistance pathway in one case and a simple lack of reoffending in another. Our findings can be used to expand our theoretic understanding of desistance as more than a lack of reoffending.",
keywords = "Desistance, cognitive and affective transformation, sexual offending",
author = "Cooley, {Brooke N.} and Sample, {Lisa L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/0735648X.2018.1479286",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "483--503",
journal = "Journal of Crime and Justice",
issn = "0735-648X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The difference between desistance from sexual offending and not reoffending

AU - Cooley, Brooke N.

AU - Sample, Lisa L.

PY - 2018/10/20

Y1 - 2018/10/20

N2 - Scholars have generally relied on a lack of sexual recidivism as an indicator of desistance, which can be misleading because desistance and the lack of recidivism are two distinct constructs and should be measured as such. Desistance includes gradual cognitive and affective transformation, whereas the lack of reoffending could be a function of several factors including the natural aging process, the lack of opportunity, or increases in social bonds. This research conducted a comparative case study analysis to highlight how desistance and the lack of reoffending differentiate within sexual offending. Our results demonstrate a desistance pathway in one case and a simple lack of reoffending in another. Our findings can be used to expand our theoretic understanding of desistance as more than a lack of reoffending.

AB - Scholars have generally relied on a lack of sexual recidivism as an indicator of desistance, which can be misleading because desistance and the lack of recidivism are two distinct constructs and should be measured as such. Desistance includes gradual cognitive and affective transformation, whereas the lack of reoffending could be a function of several factors including the natural aging process, the lack of opportunity, or increases in social bonds. This research conducted a comparative case study analysis to highlight how desistance and the lack of reoffending differentiate within sexual offending. Our results demonstrate a desistance pathway in one case and a simple lack of reoffending in another. Our findings can be used to expand our theoretic understanding of desistance as more than a lack of reoffending.

KW - Desistance

KW - cognitive and affective transformation

KW - sexual offending

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048137980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048137980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0735648X.2018.1479286

DO - 10.1080/0735648X.2018.1479286

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048137980

VL - 41

SP - 483

EP - 503

JO - Journal of Crime and Justice

JF - Journal of Crime and Justice

SN - 0735-648X

IS - 5

ER -