The development of an understanding of balance and the effect of training via stop-action video

Catherine Twomey Fosnot, George E. Forman, Carolyn Pope Edwards, Jeanne Goldhaber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Children's rule-governed, scientific reasoning in relation to the physical principles involved in balance has been studied by many, for example, Inhelder and Piaget (1958), Karmiloff-Smith and Inhelder (1974), as well as Siegler (1978). Although Siegler criticized the Genevan research on both methodological and conceptual grounds, his work can be criticized for being narrow in scope thus making his data a result of his task and design, rather than a true representation of the rules children employ naturally as they develop an understanding of balance. The work described herein is an attempt to integrate the methodologies of the Piagetian School and Siegler by making use of current video technology to naturalistically assess children's rule-governed behaviors but to also empirically validate them. The first part of this study (N=128, ages 4-9 years) used video to microanalytically assess the strategies children used as they attempted to balance a set of symmetrical, asymmetrical, and weighted blocks on a fulcrum. After validating on ordinal progression of strategies, the study used stop-action video feedback, in a predict-consequence paradigm, to focus reflection on (a) the action of the block, (b) the placement of the block, and (c) the episode in general. A two-way interaction between entering level and type of video feedback was significant. The results are interpreted in terms of Piaget's theory of equilibration suggesting that reflection and cognitive conflict can improve understanding if the child assimilates the feedback to the confirmation or refutation of an initial assimilatory scheme regarding balance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-26
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Applied Developmental Psychology
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988

Fingerprint

video
paradigm
Technology
methodology
interaction
Research
school

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

The development of an understanding of balance and the effect of training via stop-action video. / Fosnot, Catherine Twomey; Forman, George E.; Edwards, Carolyn Pope; Goldhaber, Jeanne.

In: Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.01.1988, p. 1-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fosnot, Catherine Twomey ; Forman, George E. ; Edwards, Carolyn Pope ; Goldhaber, Jeanne. / The development of an understanding of balance and the effect of training via stop-action video. In: Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 1988 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 1-26.
@article{784765d686e648ea90fe5dafdc89aad4,
title = "The development of an understanding of balance and the effect of training via stop-action video",
abstract = "Children's rule-governed, scientific reasoning in relation to the physical principles involved in balance has been studied by many, for example, Inhelder and Piaget (1958), Karmiloff-Smith and Inhelder (1974), as well as Siegler (1978). Although Siegler criticized the Genevan research on both methodological and conceptual grounds, his work can be criticized for being narrow in scope thus making his data a result of his task and design, rather than a true representation of the rules children employ naturally as they develop an understanding of balance. The work described herein is an attempt to integrate the methodologies of the Piagetian School and Siegler by making use of current video technology to naturalistically assess children's rule-governed behaviors but to also empirically validate them. The first part of this study (N=128, ages 4-9 years) used video to microanalytically assess the strategies children used as they attempted to balance a set of symmetrical, asymmetrical, and weighted blocks on a fulcrum. After validating on ordinal progression of strategies, the study used stop-action video feedback, in a predict-consequence paradigm, to focus reflection on (a) the action of the block, (b) the placement of the block, and (c) the episode in general. A two-way interaction between entering level and type of video feedback was significant. The results are interpreted in terms of Piaget's theory of equilibration suggesting that reflection and cognitive conflict can improve understanding if the child assimilates the feedback to the confirmation or refutation of an initial assimilatory scheme regarding balance.",
author = "Fosnot, {Catherine Twomey} and Forman, {George E.} and Edwards, {Carolyn Pope} and Jeanne Goldhaber",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0193-3973(88)90002-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--26",
journal = "Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0193-3973",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The development of an understanding of balance and the effect of training via stop-action video

AU - Fosnot, Catherine Twomey

AU - Forman, George E.

AU - Edwards, Carolyn Pope

AU - Goldhaber, Jeanne

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - Children's rule-governed, scientific reasoning in relation to the physical principles involved in balance has been studied by many, for example, Inhelder and Piaget (1958), Karmiloff-Smith and Inhelder (1974), as well as Siegler (1978). Although Siegler criticized the Genevan research on both methodological and conceptual grounds, his work can be criticized for being narrow in scope thus making his data a result of his task and design, rather than a true representation of the rules children employ naturally as they develop an understanding of balance. The work described herein is an attempt to integrate the methodologies of the Piagetian School and Siegler by making use of current video technology to naturalistically assess children's rule-governed behaviors but to also empirically validate them. The first part of this study (N=128, ages 4-9 years) used video to microanalytically assess the strategies children used as they attempted to balance a set of symmetrical, asymmetrical, and weighted blocks on a fulcrum. After validating on ordinal progression of strategies, the study used stop-action video feedback, in a predict-consequence paradigm, to focus reflection on (a) the action of the block, (b) the placement of the block, and (c) the episode in general. A two-way interaction between entering level and type of video feedback was significant. The results are interpreted in terms of Piaget's theory of equilibration suggesting that reflection and cognitive conflict can improve understanding if the child assimilates the feedback to the confirmation or refutation of an initial assimilatory scheme regarding balance.

AB - Children's rule-governed, scientific reasoning in relation to the physical principles involved in balance has been studied by many, for example, Inhelder and Piaget (1958), Karmiloff-Smith and Inhelder (1974), as well as Siegler (1978). Although Siegler criticized the Genevan research on both methodological and conceptual grounds, his work can be criticized for being narrow in scope thus making his data a result of his task and design, rather than a true representation of the rules children employ naturally as they develop an understanding of balance. The work described herein is an attempt to integrate the methodologies of the Piagetian School and Siegler by making use of current video technology to naturalistically assess children's rule-governed behaviors but to also empirically validate them. The first part of this study (N=128, ages 4-9 years) used video to microanalytically assess the strategies children used as they attempted to balance a set of symmetrical, asymmetrical, and weighted blocks on a fulcrum. After validating on ordinal progression of strategies, the study used stop-action video feedback, in a predict-consequence paradigm, to focus reflection on (a) the action of the block, (b) the placement of the block, and (c) the episode in general. A two-way interaction between entering level and type of video feedback was significant. The results are interpreted in terms of Piaget's theory of equilibration suggesting that reflection and cognitive conflict can improve understanding if the child assimilates the feedback to the confirmation or refutation of an initial assimilatory scheme regarding balance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38249032761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38249032761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0193-3973(88)90002-0

DO - 10.1016/0193-3973(88)90002-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38249032761

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 26

JO - Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

SN - 0193-3973

IS - 1

ER -