The development of an instrument to evaluate interprofessional student team competency

Lindsay Iverson, Martha Todd, Ann Ryan Haddad, Katie Packard, Kimberley Begley, Joy Doll, Kim Hawkins, Ann Laughlin, Julie Manz, Christopher S Wichman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Healthcare institutions, accreditation agencies for higher learning, and organizations such as the National Academy of Medicine in the United States, support interprofessional education (IPE) opportunities. However, incorporating IPE opportunities into academic settings remains difficult. One challenge is assessing IPE learning and practice outcomes, especially at the level of student performance to ensure graduates are “collaboration-ready”. The Creighton-Interprofessional Collaborative Evaluation (C-ICE) instrument was developed to address the need for a measurement tool for interprofessional student team performance. Four interprofessional competency domains provide the framework for the C-ICE instrument. Twenty-six items were identified as essential to include in the C-ICE instrument. This instrument was found to be both a reliable and a valid instrument to measure interprofessional interactions of student teams. Inter-rater reliability as measured by Krippendorff’s nominal alpha (nKALPHA) ranged from.558 to.887; with four of the five independent assessments achieving nKALPHA greater than or equal to 0.796. The findings indicated that the instrument is understandable (Gwet’s alpha coefficient (gAC) 0.63), comprehensive (gAC = 0.62), useful and applicable (gAC = 0.54) in a variety of educational settings. The C-ICE instrument provides educators a comprehensive evaluation tool for assessing student team behaviors, skills, and performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-538
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Interprofessional Care
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 3 2018

Fingerprint

Students
Education
Learning
Accreditation
Medicine
Organizations
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • competencies
  • evaluation
  • instrument
  • interprofessional collaboration
  • interprofessional education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The development of an instrument to evaluate interprofessional student team competency. / Iverson, Lindsay; Todd, Martha; Ryan Haddad, Ann; Packard, Katie; Begley, Kimberley; Doll, Joy; Hawkins, Kim; Laughlin, Ann; Manz, Julie; Wichman, Christopher S.

In: Journal of Interprofessional Care, Vol. 32, No. 5, 03.09.2018, p. 531-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Iverson, L, Todd, M, Ryan Haddad, A, Packard, K, Begley, K, Doll, J, Hawkins, K, Laughlin, A, Manz, J & Wichman, CS 2018, 'The development of an instrument to evaluate interprofessional student team competency', Journal of Interprofessional Care, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 531-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1447552
Iverson, Lindsay ; Todd, Martha ; Ryan Haddad, Ann ; Packard, Katie ; Begley, Kimberley ; Doll, Joy ; Hawkins, Kim ; Laughlin, Ann ; Manz, Julie ; Wichman, Christopher S. / The development of an instrument to evaluate interprofessional student team competency. In: Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2018 ; Vol. 32, No. 5. pp. 531-538.
@article{e74784a233f743b2b94cff146c8239ec,
title = "The development of an instrument to evaluate interprofessional student team competency",
abstract = "Healthcare institutions, accreditation agencies for higher learning, and organizations such as the National Academy of Medicine in the United States, support interprofessional education (IPE) opportunities. However, incorporating IPE opportunities into academic settings remains difficult. One challenge is assessing IPE learning and practice outcomes, especially at the level of student performance to ensure graduates are “collaboration-ready”. The Creighton-Interprofessional Collaborative Evaluation (C-ICE) instrument was developed to address the need for a measurement tool for interprofessional student team performance. Four interprofessional competency domains provide the framework for the C-ICE instrument. Twenty-six items were identified as essential to include in the C-ICE instrument. This instrument was found to be both a reliable and a valid instrument to measure interprofessional interactions of student teams. Inter-rater reliability as measured by Krippendorff’s nominal alpha (nKALPHA) ranged from.558 to.887; with four of the five independent assessments achieving nKALPHA greater than or equal to 0.796. The findings indicated that the instrument is understandable (Gwet’s alpha coefficient (gAC) 0.63), comprehensive (gAC = 0.62), useful and applicable (gAC = 0.54) in a variety of educational settings. The C-ICE instrument provides educators a comprehensive evaluation tool for assessing student team behaviors, skills, and performance.",
keywords = "Assessment, competencies, evaluation, instrument, interprofessional collaboration, interprofessional education",
author = "Lindsay Iverson and Martha Todd and {Ryan Haddad}, Ann and Katie Packard and Kimberley Begley and Joy Doll and Kim Hawkins and Ann Laughlin and Julie Manz and Wichman, {Christopher S}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/13561820.2018.1447552",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "531--538",
journal = "Journal of Interprofessional Care",
issn = "1356-1820",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The development of an instrument to evaluate interprofessional student team competency

AU - Iverson, Lindsay

AU - Todd, Martha

AU - Ryan Haddad, Ann

AU - Packard, Katie

AU - Begley, Kimberley

AU - Doll, Joy

AU - Hawkins, Kim

AU - Laughlin, Ann

AU - Manz, Julie

AU - Wichman, Christopher S

PY - 2018/9/3

Y1 - 2018/9/3

N2 - Healthcare institutions, accreditation agencies for higher learning, and organizations such as the National Academy of Medicine in the United States, support interprofessional education (IPE) opportunities. However, incorporating IPE opportunities into academic settings remains difficult. One challenge is assessing IPE learning and practice outcomes, especially at the level of student performance to ensure graduates are “collaboration-ready”. The Creighton-Interprofessional Collaborative Evaluation (C-ICE) instrument was developed to address the need for a measurement tool for interprofessional student team performance. Four interprofessional competency domains provide the framework for the C-ICE instrument. Twenty-six items were identified as essential to include in the C-ICE instrument. This instrument was found to be both a reliable and a valid instrument to measure interprofessional interactions of student teams. Inter-rater reliability as measured by Krippendorff’s nominal alpha (nKALPHA) ranged from.558 to.887; with four of the five independent assessments achieving nKALPHA greater than or equal to 0.796. The findings indicated that the instrument is understandable (Gwet’s alpha coefficient (gAC) 0.63), comprehensive (gAC = 0.62), useful and applicable (gAC = 0.54) in a variety of educational settings. The C-ICE instrument provides educators a comprehensive evaluation tool for assessing student team behaviors, skills, and performance.

AB - Healthcare institutions, accreditation agencies for higher learning, and organizations such as the National Academy of Medicine in the United States, support interprofessional education (IPE) opportunities. However, incorporating IPE opportunities into academic settings remains difficult. One challenge is assessing IPE learning and practice outcomes, especially at the level of student performance to ensure graduates are “collaboration-ready”. The Creighton-Interprofessional Collaborative Evaluation (C-ICE) instrument was developed to address the need for a measurement tool for interprofessional student team performance. Four interprofessional competency domains provide the framework for the C-ICE instrument. Twenty-six items were identified as essential to include in the C-ICE instrument. This instrument was found to be both a reliable and a valid instrument to measure interprofessional interactions of student teams. Inter-rater reliability as measured by Krippendorff’s nominal alpha (nKALPHA) ranged from.558 to.887; with four of the five independent assessments achieving nKALPHA greater than or equal to 0.796. The findings indicated that the instrument is understandable (Gwet’s alpha coefficient (gAC) 0.63), comprehensive (gAC = 0.62), useful and applicable (gAC = 0.54) in a variety of educational settings. The C-ICE instrument provides educators a comprehensive evaluation tool for assessing student team behaviors, skills, and performance.

KW - Assessment

KW - competencies

KW - evaluation

KW - instrument

KW - interprofessional collaboration

KW - interprofessional education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044089436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044089436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13561820.2018.1447552

DO - 10.1080/13561820.2018.1447552

M3 - Article

C2 - 29537904

AN - SCOPUS:85044089436

VL - 32

SP - 531

EP - 538

JO - Journal of Interprofessional Care

JF - Journal of Interprofessional Care

SN - 1356-1820

IS - 5

ER -