The credibility of recovered memory testimony: Exploring the effects of alleged victim and perpetrator gender

Brian H Bornstein, Stephanie L. Muller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose was to explore the effects of victim/complainant and perpetrator/defendant gender on the impact of recovered memory testimony in criminal sexual abuse trials. Method: A jury simulation methodology was used. Two hundred forty-six participants read a summary of a sexual abuse trial in which the following three variables were manipulated: the complainant's gender, the defendant's gender, and whether the complainant's memory of the alleged abuse had been 'recovered' or remembered all along. Participants reached a verdict and rated the culpability and credibility of the parties. Results: Compared to a case where the memory of the abuse had always been remembered, recovered memory testimony led to lower perceptions of the defendant's culpability and higher perceptions of the defendant's credibility. In addition, the complainant with recovered memory was viewed as less credible and less likely to be telling the truth. These effects of testimony type (i.e., recovered vs. remembered) were qualified by an interaction with complainant and defendant gender, such that testimony type exerted an effect in cases of alleged heterosexual but not homosexual abuse. Conclusion: The results suggest that mock jurors' judgments in sexual abuse cases reflect their stereotypes about sexual abuse and expectations regarding the relative likelihood of repression in various circumstances.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1415-1426
Number of pages12
JournalChild Abuse and Neglect
Volume25
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 7 2001

Fingerprint

testimony
credibility
Sex Offenses
sexual violence
gender
abuse
Repression (Psychology)
Heterosexuality
repression
homosexuality
stereotype
simulation
methodology
interaction

Keywords

  • Child abuse
  • Gender effects
  • Juries
  • Recovered memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The credibility of recovered memory testimony : Exploring the effects of alleged victim and perpetrator gender. / Bornstein, Brian H; Muller, Stephanie L.

In: Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 25, No. 11, 07.11.2001, p. 1415-1426.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b7b3d8d9edc4870bf1d3adc0f0388f1,
title = "The credibility of recovered memory testimony: Exploring the effects of alleged victim and perpetrator gender",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose was to explore the effects of victim/complainant and perpetrator/defendant gender on the impact of recovered memory testimony in criminal sexual abuse trials. Method: A jury simulation methodology was used. Two hundred forty-six participants read a summary of a sexual abuse trial in which the following three variables were manipulated: the complainant's gender, the defendant's gender, and whether the complainant's memory of the alleged abuse had been 'recovered' or remembered all along. Participants reached a verdict and rated the culpability and credibility of the parties. Results: Compared to a case where the memory of the abuse had always been remembered, recovered memory testimony led to lower perceptions of the defendant's culpability and higher perceptions of the defendant's credibility. In addition, the complainant with recovered memory was viewed as less credible and less likely to be telling the truth. These effects of testimony type (i.e., recovered vs. remembered) were qualified by an interaction with complainant and defendant gender, such that testimony type exerted an effect in cases of alleged heterosexual but not homosexual abuse. Conclusion: The results suggest that mock jurors' judgments in sexual abuse cases reflect their stereotypes about sexual abuse and expectations regarding the relative likelihood of repression in various circumstances.",
keywords = "Child abuse, Gender effects, Juries, Recovered memory",
author = "Bornstein, {Brian H} and Muller, {Stephanie L.}",
year = "2001",
month = "11",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00282-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "1415--1426",
journal = "Child Abuse and Neglect",
issn = "0145-2134",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The credibility of recovered memory testimony

T2 - Exploring the effects of alleged victim and perpetrator gender

AU - Bornstein, Brian H

AU - Muller, Stephanie L.

PY - 2001/11/7

Y1 - 2001/11/7

N2 - Objective: The purpose was to explore the effects of victim/complainant and perpetrator/defendant gender on the impact of recovered memory testimony in criminal sexual abuse trials. Method: A jury simulation methodology was used. Two hundred forty-six participants read a summary of a sexual abuse trial in which the following three variables were manipulated: the complainant's gender, the defendant's gender, and whether the complainant's memory of the alleged abuse had been 'recovered' or remembered all along. Participants reached a verdict and rated the culpability and credibility of the parties. Results: Compared to a case where the memory of the abuse had always been remembered, recovered memory testimony led to lower perceptions of the defendant's culpability and higher perceptions of the defendant's credibility. In addition, the complainant with recovered memory was viewed as less credible and less likely to be telling the truth. These effects of testimony type (i.e., recovered vs. remembered) were qualified by an interaction with complainant and defendant gender, such that testimony type exerted an effect in cases of alleged heterosexual but not homosexual abuse. Conclusion: The results suggest that mock jurors' judgments in sexual abuse cases reflect their stereotypes about sexual abuse and expectations regarding the relative likelihood of repression in various circumstances.

AB - Objective: The purpose was to explore the effects of victim/complainant and perpetrator/defendant gender on the impact of recovered memory testimony in criminal sexual abuse trials. Method: A jury simulation methodology was used. Two hundred forty-six participants read a summary of a sexual abuse trial in which the following three variables were manipulated: the complainant's gender, the defendant's gender, and whether the complainant's memory of the alleged abuse had been 'recovered' or remembered all along. Participants reached a verdict and rated the culpability and credibility of the parties. Results: Compared to a case where the memory of the abuse had always been remembered, recovered memory testimony led to lower perceptions of the defendant's culpability and higher perceptions of the defendant's credibility. In addition, the complainant with recovered memory was viewed as less credible and less likely to be telling the truth. These effects of testimony type (i.e., recovered vs. remembered) were qualified by an interaction with complainant and defendant gender, such that testimony type exerted an effect in cases of alleged heterosexual but not homosexual abuse. Conclusion: The results suggest that mock jurors' judgments in sexual abuse cases reflect their stereotypes about sexual abuse and expectations regarding the relative likelihood of repression in various circumstances.

KW - Child abuse

KW - Gender effects

KW - Juries

KW - Recovered memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034772433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034772433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00282-4

DO - 10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00282-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 11766008

AN - SCOPUS:0034772433

VL - 25

SP - 1415

EP - 1426

JO - Child Abuse and Neglect

JF - Child Abuse and Neglect

SN - 0145-2134

IS - 11

ER -