The convergent validity of office discipline referrals with the CBCL-TRF

J. R. Nelson, Gregory J. Benner, Robert C. Reid, Michael H. Epstein, De Ann Currin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Office discipline referrals are one approach that educators could use (a) as a guide in the development and/or selection of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention programs; (b) as an outcome measure with which to assess the effectiveness of those programs; and (c) as an early screening procedure to identify children who might benefit from the secondary and tertiary programs. The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which children who met the borderline and clinical cut-off scores on the Teacher Report Form (TRF; Achenbach, 1991b) received one or more office discipline referrals (the most liberal criteria possible) to determine the levels of false negatives (failure to detect a problem when one exists) that would occur if one used office discipline referrals as an early screening device.The relatively high levels of false negatives suggest that the use of office discipline referrals as an early screening device may fail to identify relatively large numbers of young children in need of interventions and supports. This issue appears to be even more pronounced in the case of students who are experiencing internalizing-related problems. Results, limitations, and future research needs are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-188
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Referral and Consultation
Tertiary Prevention
Equipment and Supplies
Program Evaluation
Primary Prevention
Secondary Prevention
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
educator
Students
teacher
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The convergent validity of office discipline referrals with the CBCL-TRF. / Nelson, J. R.; Benner, Gregory J.; Reid, Robert C.; Epstein, Michael H.; Currin, De Ann.

In: Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.01.2002, p. 181-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nelson, J. R. ; Benner, Gregory J. ; Reid, Robert C. ; Epstein, Michael H. ; Currin, De Ann. / The convergent validity of office discipline referrals with the CBCL-TRF. In: Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 2002 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 181-188.
@article{8628547f87014a4895907d1124ea85e5,
title = "The convergent validity of office discipline referrals with the CBCL-TRF",
abstract = "Office discipline referrals are one approach that educators could use (a) as a guide in the development and/or selection of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention programs; (b) as an outcome measure with which to assess the effectiveness of those programs; and (c) as an early screening procedure to identify children who might benefit from the secondary and tertiary programs. The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which children who met the borderline and clinical cut-off scores on the Teacher Report Form (TRF; Achenbach, 1991b) received one or more office discipline referrals (the most liberal criteria possible) to determine the levels of false negatives (failure to detect a problem when one exists) that would occur if one used office discipline referrals as an early screening device.The relatively high levels of false negatives suggest that the use of office discipline referrals as an early screening device may fail to identify relatively large numbers of young children in need of interventions and supports. This issue appears to be even more pronounced in the case of students who are experiencing internalizing-related problems. Results, limitations, and future research needs are discussed.",
author = "Nelson, {J. R.} and Benner, {Gregory J.} and Reid, {Robert C.} and Epstein, {Michael H.} and Currin, {De Ann}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/10634266020100030601",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "181--188",
journal = "Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders",
issn = "1063-4266",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The convergent validity of office discipline referrals with the CBCL-TRF

AU - Nelson, J. R.

AU - Benner, Gregory J.

AU - Reid, Robert C.

AU - Epstein, Michael H.

AU - Currin, De Ann

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Office discipline referrals are one approach that educators could use (a) as a guide in the development and/or selection of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention programs; (b) as an outcome measure with which to assess the effectiveness of those programs; and (c) as an early screening procedure to identify children who might benefit from the secondary and tertiary programs. The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which children who met the borderline and clinical cut-off scores on the Teacher Report Form (TRF; Achenbach, 1991b) received one or more office discipline referrals (the most liberal criteria possible) to determine the levels of false negatives (failure to detect a problem when one exists) that would occur if one used office discipline referrals as an early screening device.The relatively high levels of false negatives suggest that the use of office discipline referrals as an early screening device may fail to identify relatively large numbers of young children in need of interventions and supports. This issue appears to be even more pronounced in the case of students who are experiencing internalizing-related problems. Results, limitations, and future research needs are discussed.

AB - Office discipline referrals are one approach that educators could use (a) as a guide in the development and/or selection of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention programs; (b) as an outcome measure with which to assess the effectiveness of those programs; and (c) as an early screening procedure to identify children who might benefit from the secondary and tertiary programs. The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which children who met the borderline and clinical cut-off scores on the Teacher Report Form (TRF; Achenbach, 1991b) received one or more office discipline referrals (the most liberal criteria possible) to determine the levels of false negatives (failure to detect a problem when one exists) that would occur if one used office discipline referrals as an early screening device.The relatively high levels of false negatives suggest that the use of office discipline referrals as an early screening device may fail to identify relatively large numbers of young children in need of interventions and supports. This issue appears to be even more pronounced in the case of students who are experiencing internalizing-related problems. Results, limitations, and future research needs are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036733554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036733554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/10634266020100030601

DO - 10.1177/10634266020100030601

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036733554

VL - 10

SP - 181

EP - 188

JO - Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

JF - Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

SN - 1063-4266

IS - 3

ER -