The Consequences of Precautionary Allergen Labeling

Safe Haven or Unjustifiable Burden?

Katrina J. Allen, Stephen L Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Precautionary allergen labeling (PAL) also known as “may contain” labeling has been applied to many packaged food products around the world. PAL is a voluntary form of labeling whose original intent was to help ensure that packaged foods were as safe as possible for allergic consumers by alerting them to the possible presence of allergen residues resulting from the use of shared processing equipment, shared processing facilities, or other industry practices. However, the proliferation of PAL and the myriad of various phrasing used as PAL statements are confusing to consumers and serve to diminish their quality of life. Thus many allergic consumers are known to ignore PAL statements. Analytical surveys indicate that many PAL products contain no detectable allergen residues and are likely safe for allergic consumers. However, up to 8% of allergic consumers report having had reactions to the ingestion of PAL products. Clearly a better approach to labeling is needed that balances the health and safety considerations of allergic consumers with their desire to enjoy the widest possible array of foods available in the marketplace. This article presents an overview and discussion of the shortcomings of the current PAL system and explores why a new approach is required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)400-407
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Allergens
Product Labeling
Food
Industry
Eating
Quality of Life
Safety
Equipment and Supplies
Health

Keywords

  • Food allergy
  • Mandatory labeling
  • Nuts
  • Peanut
  • Precautionary allergen
  • Risk assessment
  • VITAL

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy

Cite this

The Consequences of Precautionary Allergen Labeling : Safe Haven or Unjustifiable Burden? / Allen, Katrina J.; Taylor, Stephen L.

In: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 400-407.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{06ec77afe3a0452782b11839de142851,
title = "The Consequences of Precautionary Allergen Labeling: Safe Haven or Unjustifiable Burden?",
abstract = "Precautionary allergen labeling (PAL) also known as “may contain” labeling has been applied to many packaged food products around the world. PAL is a voluntary form of labeling whose original intent was to help ensure that packaged foods were as safe as possible for allergic consumers by alerting them to the possible presence of allergen residues resulting from the use of shared processing equipment, shared processing facilities, or other industry practices. However, the proliferation of PAL and the myriad of various phrasing used as PAL statements are confusing to consumers and serve to diminish their quality of life. Thus many allergic consumers are known to ignore PAL statements. Analytical surveys indicate that many PAL products contain no detectable allergen residues and are likely safe for allergic consumers. However, up to 8{\%} of allergic consumers report having had reactions to the ingestion of PAL products. Clearly a better approach to labeling is needed that balances the health and safety considerations of allergic consumers with their desire to enjoy the widest possible array of foods available in the marketplace. This article presents an overview and discussion of the shortcomings of the current PAL system and explores why a new approach is required.",
keywords = "Food allergy, Mandatory labeling, Nuts, Peanut, Precautionary allergen, Risk assessment, VITAL",
author = "Allen, {Katrina J.} and Taylor, {Stephen L}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaip.2017.12.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "400--407",
journal = "Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice",
issn = "2213-2198",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Consequences of Precautionary Allergen Labeling

T2 - Safe Haven or Unjustifiable Burden?

AU - Allen, Katrina J.

AU - Taylor, Stephen L

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Precautionary allergen labeling (PAL) also known as “may contain” labeling has been applied to many packaged food products around the world. PAL is a voluntary form of labeling whose original intent was to help ensure that packaged foods were as safe as possible for allergic consumers by alerting them to the possible presence of allergen residues resulting from the use of shared processing equipment, shared processing facilities, or other industry practices. However, the proliferation of PAL and the myriad of various phrasing used as PAL statements are confusing to consumers and serve to diminish their quality of life. Thus many allergic consumers are known to ignore PAL statements. Analytical surveys indicate that many PAL products contain no detectable allergen residues and are likely safe for allergic consumers. However, up to 8% of allergic consumers report having had reactions to the ingestion of PAL products. Clearly a better approach to labeling is needed that balances the health and safety considerations of allergic consumers with their desire to enjoy the widest possible array of foods available in the marketplace. This article presents an overview and discussion of the shortcomings of the current PAL system and explores why a new approach is required.

AB - Precautionary allergen labeling (PAL) also known as “may contain” labeling has been applied to many packaged food products around the world. PAL is a voluntary form of labeling whose original intent was to help ensure that packaged foods were as safe as possible for allergic consumers by alerting them to the possible presence of allergen residues resulting from the use of shared processing equipment, shared processing facilities, or other industry practices. However, the proliferation of PAL and the myriad of various phrasing used as PAL statements are confusing to consumers and serve to diminish their quality of life. Thus many allergic consumers are known to ignore PAL statements. Analytical surveys indicate that many PAL products contain no detectable allergen residues and are likely safe for allergic consumers. However, up to 8% of allergic consumers report having had reactions to the ingestion of PAL products. Clearly a better approach to labeling is needed that balances the health and safety considerations of allergic consumers with their desire to enjoy the widest possible array of foods available in the marketplace. This article presents an overview and discussion of the shortcomings of the current PAL system and explores why a new approach is required.

KW - Food allergy

KW - Mandatory labeling

KW - Nuts

KW - Peanut

KW - Precautionary allergen

KW - Risk assessment

KW - VITAL

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043573188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043573188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.12.025

DO - 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.12.025

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 400

EP - 407

JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice

JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice

SN - 2213-2198

IS - 2

ER -