The Amalgamation of Special Education? On Practices and Policies that may Render it Unrecognizable

John W. Maag, James M. Kauffman, Richard L. Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The decades-long assault on principles of special education—some knowingly, such as the regular education initiative, and some unknowingly, such as certain presumptions and practices of full inclusion—have consequences that may negatively affect the future of the field. Protracted criticisms on the character, role, and legitimacy of traditional special education and its related policies and practices have, in some ways, weakened its identity. It is conceivable that special education, as a robust and independent educational component is being threatened. Factors leading to this conclusion are discussed as well as a call for recognition of policy implications and needed research to guide policy development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-200
Number of pages16
JournalExceptionality
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2019

Fingerprint

Special Education
special education
policy of recognition
Illegitimacy
Policy Making
assault
development policy
legitimacy
criticism
Education
Research
education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

The Amalgamation of Special Education? On Practices and Policies that may Render it Unrecognizable. / Maag, John W.; Kauffman, James M.; Simpson, Richard L.

In: Exceptionality, Vol. 27, No. 3, 03.07.2019, p. 185-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Maag, John W. ; Kauffman, James M. ; Simpson, Richard L. / The Amalgamation of Special Education? On Practices and Policies that may Render it Unrecognizable. In: Exceptionality. 2019 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 185-200.
@article{8ba0c99663404029905fc85f08cef46b,
title = "The Amalgamation of Special Education? On Practices and Policies that may Render it Unrecognizable",
abstract = "The decades-long assault on principles of special education—some knowingly, such as the regular education initiative, and some unknowingly, such as certain presumptions and practices of full inclusion—have consequences that may negatively affect the future of the field. Protracted criticisms on the character, role, and legitimacy of traditional special education and its related policies and practices have, in some ways, weakened its identity. It is conceivable that special education, as a robust and independent educational component is being threatened. Factors leading to this conclusion are discussed as well as a call for recognition of policy implications and needed research to guide policy development.",
author = "Maag, {John W.} and Kauffman, {James M.} and Simpson, {Richard L.}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/09362835.2018.1425624",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "185--200",
journal = "Exceptionality",
issn = "0936-2835",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Amalgamation of Special Education? On Practices and Policies that may Render it Unrecognizable

AU - Maag, John W.

AU - Kauffman, James M.

AU - Simpson, Richard L.

PY - 2019/7/3

Y1 - 2019/7/3

N2 - The decades-long assault on principles of special education—some knowingly, such as the regular education initiative, and some unknowingly, such as certain presumptions and practices of full inclusion—have consequences that may negatively affect the future of the field. Protracted criticisms on the character, role, and legitimacy of traditional special education and its related policies and practices have, in some ways, weakened its identity. It is conceivable that special education, as a robust and independent educational component is being threatened. Factors leading to this conclusion are discussed as well as a call for recognition of policy implications and needed research to guide policy development.

AB - The decades-long assault on principles of special education—some knowingly, such as the regular education initiative, and some unknowingly, such as certain presumptions and practices of full inclusion—have consequences that may negatively affect the future of the field. Protracted criticisms on the character, role, and legitimacy of traditional special education and its related policies and practices have, in some ways, weakened its identity. It is conceivable that special education, as a robust and independent educational component is being threatened. Factors leading to this conclusion are discussed as well as a call for recognition of policy implications and needed research to guide policy development.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067804519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067804519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09362835.2018.1425624

DO - 10.1080/09362835.2018.1425624

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85067804519

VL - 27

SP - 185

EP - 200

JO - Exceptionality

JF - Exceptionality

SN - 0936-2835

IS - 3

ER -