Test-retest reliability of the vestibular sensory-evoked potential (VsEP) in C57BL/6J mice

Julie A. Honaker, Choongheon Lee, Robin E. Criter, Timothy A. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The vestibular sensory-evoked potential (VsEP) is an electrical potential that provides a direct test of vestibular function in animals. VsEP recordings are carried out using subcutaneous stainless steel electrodes placed over the nuchal crest (noninverting), behind either the left or right pinna (inverting), and at the hip (ground). A noninvasive head clip is used to secure the head to a mechanical shaker for delivery of a linear vestibular stimulus measured in units of jerk (g/msec). Frequent repositioning of the noninvasive head clip and skin electrodes may be necessary during recording for particular protocols; however, the test-retest reliability of the VsEP response (latency, amplitude, and threshold) has not been determined. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the possible effects of frequent repositioning of the noninvasive head clip and skin electrodes on VsEP response parameters (latencies, amplitudes, and thresholds). We hypothesize that the VsEP response will remain stable and reliable with such repeated measurements in a given animal across time. Research Design: Linear VsEP responses were recorded from ten C57 mice (ages: 2.45 mo 60.20; weights: 17.94 g61.51). Two standard threshold protocols and four repeated VsEP measurements at16 dB re: 1.0 g/msec were performed, with four selected time points of head clip repositioning. In addition, three novice investigators performed measurements of noninverting electrode placement and head clip positioning. Results: VsEP response latency, amplitude, and threshold means did not significantly change with frequent repositioning of the head clip and skin electrodes; however, increased variability was observed. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that repositioning does not introduce significant changes in mean parameter values of the recorded VsEP response waveform; however, mean absolute difference calculations demonstrated that frequent repositioning increased response variance. For VsEP protocols requiring frequent repositioning, standardized electrode montage, optimal placement of the noninverting electrode at the nuchal crest, and increased sample size are suggested.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-67
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Audiology
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Inbred C57BL Mouse
Evoked Potentials
Reproducibility of Results
Surgical Instruments
Electrodes
Head
Reaction Time
Skin
Vestibular Function Tests
Stainless Steel
Sample Size
Hip
Research Design
Research Personnel
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Linear acceleration
  • Mouse
  • Otolith
  • Vestibular
  • Vestibular sensory-evoked potential
  • VsEP

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Test-retest reliability of the vestibular sensory-evoked potential (VsEP) in C57BL/6J mice. / Honaker, Julie A.; Lee, Choongheon; Criter, Robin E.; Jones, Timothy A.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 59-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6cb7fc4a5c534445be69f7f43f01e282,
title = "Test-retest reliability of the vestibular sensory-evoked potential (VsEP) in C57BL/6J mice",
abstract = "Background: The vestibular sensory-evoked potential (VsEP) is an electrical potential that provides a direct test of vestibular function in animals. VsEP recordings are carried out using subcutaneous stainless steel electrodes placed over the nuchal crest (noninverting), behind either the left or right pinna (inverting), and at the hip (ground). A noninvasive head clip is used to secure the head to a mechanical shaker for delivery of a linear vestibular stimulus measured in units of jerk (g/msec). Frequent repositioning of the noninvasive head clip and skin electrodes may be necessary during recording for particular protocols; however, the test-retest reliability of the VsEP response (latency, amplitude, and threshold) has not been determined. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the possible effects of frequent repositioning of the noninvasive head clip and skin electrodes on VsEP response parameters (latencies, amplitudes, and thresholds). We hypothesize that the VsEP response will remain stable and reliable with such repeated measurements in a given animal across time. Research Design: Linear VsEP responses were recorded from ten C57 mice (ages: 2.45 mo 60.20; weights: 17.94 g61.51). Two standard threshold protocols and four repeated VsEP measurements at16 dB re: 1.0 g/msec were performed, with four selected time points of head clip repositioning. In addition, three novice investigators performed measurements of noninverting electrode placement and head clip positioning. Results: VsEP response latency, amplitude, and threshold means did not significantly change with frequent repositioning of the head clip and skin electrodes; however, increased variability was observed. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that repositioning does not introduce significant changes in mean parameter values of the recorded VsEP response waveform; however, mean absolute difference calculations demonstrated that frequent repositioning increased response variance. For VsEP protocols requiring frequent repositioning, standardized electrode montage, optimal placement of the noninverting electrode at the nuchal crest, and increased sample size are suggested.",
keywords = "Linear acceleration, Mouse, Otolith, Vestibular, Vestibular sensory-evoked potential, VsEP",
author = "Honaker, {Julie A.} and Choongheon Lee and Criter, {Robin E.} and Jones, {Timothy A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3766/jaaa.26.1.7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "59--67",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Audiology",
issn = "1050-0545",
publisher = "American Academy of Audiology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Test-retest reliability of the vestibular sensory-evoked potential (VsEP) in C57BL/6J mice

AU - Honaker, Julie A.

AU - Lee, Choongheon

AU - Criter, Robin E.

AU - Jones, Timothy A.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: The vestibular sensory-evoked potential (VsEP) is an electrical potential that provides a direct test of vestibular function in animals. VsEP recordings are carried out using subcutaneous stainless steel electrodes placed over the nuchal crest (noninverting), behind either the left or right pinna (inverting), and at the hip (ground). A noninvasive head clip is used to secure the head to a mechanical shaker for delivery of a linear vestibular stimulus measured in units of jerk (g/msec). Frequent repositioning of the noninvasive head clip and skin electrodes may be necessary during recording for particular protocols; however, the test-retest reliability of the VsEP response (latency, amplitude, and threshold) has not been determined. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the possible effects of frequent repositioning of the noninvasive head clip and skin electrodes on VsEP response parameters (latencies, amplitudes, and thresholds). We hypothesize that the VsEP response will remain stable and reliable with such repeated measurements in a given animal across time. Research Design: Linear VsEP responses were recorded from ten C57 mice (ages: 2.45 mo 60.20; weights: 17.94 g61.51). Two standard threshold protocols and four repeated VsEP measurements at16 dB re: 1.0 g/msec were performed, with four selected time points of head clip repositioning. In addition, three novice investigators performed measurements of noninverting electrode placement and head clip positioning. Results: VsEP response latency, amplitude, and threshold means did not significantly change with frequent repositioning of the head clip and skin electrodes; however, increased variability was observed. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that repositioning does not introduce significant changes in mean parameter values of the recorded VsEP response waveform; however, mean absolute difference calculations demonstrated that frequent repositioning increased response variance. For VsEP protocols requiring frequent repositioning, standardized electrode montage, optimal placement of the noninverting electrode at the nuchal crest, and increased sample size are suggested.

AB - Background: The vestibular sensory-evoked potential (VsEP) is an electrical potential that provides a direct test of vestibular function in animals. VsEP recordings are carried out using subcutaneous stainless steel electrodes placed over the nuchal crest (noninverting), behind either the left or right pinna (inverting), and at the hip (ground). A noninvasive head clip is used to secure the head to a mechanical shaker for delivery of a linear vestibular stimulus measured in units of jerk (g/msec). Frequent repositioning of the noninvasive head clip and skin electrodes may be necessary during recording for particular protocols; however, the test-retest reliability of the VsEP response (latency, amplitude, and threshold) has not been determined. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the possible effects of frequent repositioning of the noninvasive head clip and skin electrodes on VsEP response parameters (latencies, amplitudes, and thresholds). We hypothesize that the VsEP response will remain stable and reliable with such repeated measurements in a given animal across time. Research Design: Linear VsEP responses were recorded from ten C57 mice (ages: 2.45 mo 60.20; weights: 17.94 g61.51). Two standard threshold protocols and four repeated VsEP measurements at16 dB re: 1.0 g/msec were performed, with four selected time points of head clip repositioning. In addition, three novice investigators performed measurements of noninverting electrode placement and head clip positioning. Results: VsEP response latency, amplitude, and threshold means did not significantly change with frequent repositioning of the head clip and skin electrodes; however, increased variability was observed. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that repositioning does not introduce significant changes in mean parameter values of the recorded VsEP response waveform; however, mean absolute difference calculations demonstrated that frequent repositioning increased response variance. For VsEP protocols requiring frequent repositioning, standardized electrode montage, optimal placement of the noninverting electrode at the nuchal crest, and increased sample size are suggested.

KW - Linear acceleration

KW - Mouse

KW - Otolith

KW - Vestibular

KW - Vestibular sensory-evoked potential

KW - VsEP

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920997068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920997068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3766/jaaa.26.1.7

DO - 10.3766/jaaa.26.1.7

M3 - Article

C2 - 25597461

AN - SCOPUS:84920997068

VL - 26

SP - 59

EP - 67

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

SN - 1050-0545

IS - 1

ER -