Termination Guidelines for a Magnet School Review Committee: Application of Decision Theory

Richard L. Wiener, Monica A. Frank, Tracy Libros

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of a magnet school is to assist the school system in reaching its desegregation goals while providing a quality education. One of the roles of the magnet review committee is to evaluate the degree of success of particular magnets and make recommendations to the United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri, about proposals to terminate magnet schools. The committee members have found it difficult to reach consensus on these proposals. We conducted an empirical case study of the process by which applied experimental psychology consultants helped to develop the review procedure. We constructed a decision guideline by quantitatively modeling the attitudes, beliefs, and legal positions of the decision makers and representing them as a series of weighted utility functions. The decision aid was accepted by the magnet review committee and the federal court and is currently being used by the committee to evaluate schools for termination. In this article we discuss the development of the decision aid from methodological and consultative perspectives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)316-322
Number of pages7
JournalProfessional Psychology: Research and Practice
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 1988

Fingerprint

Decision Theory
Magnets
Advisory Committees
Guidelines
Decision Support Techniques
Applied Psychology
Experimental Psychology
Committee Membership
Consultants
Consensus
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Termination Guidelines for a Magnet School Review Committee : Application of Decision Theory. / Wiener, Richard L.; Frank, Monica A.; Libros, Tracy.

In: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.06.1988, p. 316-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a2bac563b0654fa88c92ebdb71a5887b,
title = "Termination Guidelines for a Magnet School Review Committee: Application of Decision Theory",
abstract = "The purpose of a magnet school is to assist the school system in reaching its desegregation goals while providing a quality education. One of the roles of the magnet review committee is to evaluate the degree of success of particular magnets and make recommendations to the United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri, about proposals to terminate magnet schools. The committee members have found it difficult to reach consensus on these proposals. We conducted an empirical case study of the process by which applied experimental psychology consultants helped to develop the review procedure. We constructed a decision guideline by quantitatively modeling the attitudes, beliefs, and legal positions of the decision makers and representing them as a series of weighted utility functions. The decision aid was accepted by the magnet review committee and the federal court and is currently being used by the committee to evaluate schools for termination. In this article we discuss the development of the decision aid from methodological and consultative perspectives.",
author = "Wiener, {Richard L.} and Frank, {Monica A.} and Tracy Libros",
year = "1988",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0735-7028.19.3.316",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "316--322",
journal = "Professional Psychology: Research and Practice",
issn = "0735-7028",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Termination Guidelines for a Magnet School Review Committee

T2 - Application of Decision Theory

AU - Wiener, Richard L.

AU - Frank, Monica A.

AU - Libros, Tracy

PY - 1988/6/1

Y1 - 1988/6/1

N2 - The purpose of a magnet school is to assist the school system in reaching its desegregation goals while providing a quality education. One of the roles of the magnet review committee is to evaluate the degree of success of particular magnets and make recommendations to the United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri, about proposals to terminate magnet schools. The committee members have found it difficult to reach consensus on these proposals. We conducted an empirical case study of the process by which applied experimental psychology consultants helped to develop the review procedure. We constructed a decision guideline by quantitatively modeling the attitudes, beliefs, and legal positions of the decision makers and representing them as a series of weighted utility functions. The decision aid was accepted by the magnet review committee and the federal court and is currently being used by the committee to evaluate schools for termination. In this article we discuss the development of the decision aid from methodological and consultative perspectives.

AB - The purpose of a magnet school is to assist the school system in reaching its desegregation goals while providing a quality education. One of the roles of the magnet review committee is to evaluate the degree of success of particular magnets and make recommendations to the United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri, about proposals to terminate magnet schools. The committee members have found it difficult to reach consensus on these proposals. We conducted an empirical case study of the process by which applied experimental psychology consultants helped to develop the review procedure. We constructed a decision guideline by quantitatively modeling the attitudes, beliefs, and legal positions of the decision makers and representing them as a series of weighted utility functions. The decision aid was accepted by the magnet review committee and the federal court and is currently being used by the committee to evaluate schools for termination. In this article we discuss the development of the decision aid from methodological and consultative perspectives.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350391968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350391968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0735-7028.19.3.316

DO - 10.1037/0735-7028.19.3.316

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70350391968

VL - 19

SP - 316

EP - 322

JO - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

JF - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

SN - 0735-7028

IS - 3

ER -