Targeted and non-targeted approaches for complex natural sample profiling by GC×GC-qMS

Chiara Cordero, Erica Liberto, Carlo Bicchi, Patrizia Rubiolo, Stephen E. Reichenbach, Xue Tian, Qingping Tao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study examines the ability of targeted and non-targeted methods to provide specific and complementary information on groups of samples on the basis of their component distribution on the two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) plane. The volatile fraction of Arabica green and roasted coffee samples differing in geographical origins and roasting treatments and the volatile fraction from juniper needles, sampled by headspace-solid phase microextraction, were analyzed by GC×GC-qMS and sample profiles processed by different approaches. In the target analysis profiling, samples submitted to different roasting cycles and/or differing in origin and post-harvest treatment are characterized on the basis of known constituents (botanical, technological, and/or aromatic markers). This approach provides highly reliable results on quali-quantitative compositional differences because of the authentic standard confirmation, extending and improving the specificity of the comparative procedure to trace and minor components. On the other hand, non-targeted data-processing methods (e.g., direct image comparison and template-based fingerprinting) include in the sample comparisons and correlations all detected sample components, offering an increased discrimination potential by identifying compounds that are comparatively significant but not known targets. Results demonstrate the ability of GC×GC to explore in depth the complexity of samples and emphasize the advantages of a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach to improve the level of information provided by GC×GC separation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-261
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Chromatographic Science
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Coffee
Gas chromatography
Needles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry

Cite this

Targeted and non-targeted approaches for complex natural sample profiling by GC×GC-qMS. / Cordero, Chiara; Liberto, Erica; Bicchi, Carlo; Rubiolo, Patrizia; Reichenbach, Stephen E.; Tian, Xue; Tao, Qingping.

In: Journal of Chromatographic Science, Vol. 48, No. 4, 04.2010, p. 251-261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cordero, Chiara ; Liberto, Erica ; Bicchi, Carlo ; Rubiolo, Patrizia ; Reichenbach, Stephen E. ; Tian, Xue ; Tao, Qingping. / Targeted and non-targeted approaches for complex natural sample profiling by GC×GC-qMS. In: Journal of Chromatographic Science. 2010 ; Vol. 48, No. 4. pp. 251-261.
@article{36109528cce644c89aeb033461bfe852,
title = "Targeted and non-targeted approaches for complex natural sample profiling by GC×GC-qMS",
abstract = "The present study examines the ability of targeted and non-targeted methods to provide specific and complementary information on groups of samples on the basis of their component distribution on the two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) plane. The volatile fraction of Arabica green and roasted coffee samples differing in geographical origins and roasting treatments and the volatile fraction from juniper needles, sampled by headspace-solid phase microextraction, were analyzed by GC×GC-qMS and sample profiles processed by different approaches. In the target analysis profiling, samples submitted to different roasting cycles and/or differing in origin and post-harvest treatment are characterized on the basis of known constituents (botanical, technological, and/or aromatic markers). This approach provides highly reliable results on quali-quantitative compositional differences because of the authentic standard confirmation, extending and improving the specificity of the comparative procedure to trace and minor components. On the other hand, non-targeted data-processing methods (e.g., direct image comparison and template-based fingerprinting) include in the sample comparisons and correlations all detected sample components, offering an increased discrimination potential by identifying compounds that are comparatively significant but not known targets. Results demonstrate the ability of GC×GC to explore in depth the complexity of samples and emphasize the advantages of a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach to improve the level of information provided by GC×GC separation.",
author = "Chiara Cordero and Erica Liberto and Carlo Bicchi and Patrizia Rubiolo and Reichenbach, {Stephen E.} and Xue Tian and Qingping Tao",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1093/chromsci/48.4.251",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "251--261",
journal = "Journal of Chromatographic Science",
issn = "0021-9665",
publisher = "Preston Publications",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Targeted and non-targeted approaches for complex natural sample profiling by GC×GC-qMS

AU - Cordero, Chiara

AU - Liberto, Erica

AU - Bicchi, Carlo

AU - Rubiolo, Patrizia

AU - Reichenbach, Stephen E.

AU - Tian, Xue

AU - Tao, Qingping

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - The present study examines the ability of targeted and non-targeted methods to provide specific and complementary information on groups of samples on the basis of their component distribution on the two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) plane. The volatile fraction of Arabica green and roasted coffee samples differing in geographical origins and roasting treatments and the volatile fraction from juniper needles, sampled by headspace-solid phase microextraction, were analyzed by GC×GC-qMS and sample profiles processed by different approaches. In the target analysis profiling, samples submitted to different roasting cycles and/or differing in origin and post-harvest treatment are characterized on the basis of known constituents (botanical, technological, and/or aromatic markers). This approach provides highly reliable results on quali-quantitative compositional differences because of the authentic standard confirmation, extending and improving the specificity of the comparative procedure to trace and minor components. On the other hand, non-targeted data-processing methods (e.g., direct image comparison and template-based fingerprinting) include in the sample comparisons and correlations all detected sample components, offering an increased discrimination potential by identifying compounds that are comparatively significant but not known targets. Results demonstrate the ability of GC×GC to explore in depth the complexity of samples and emphasize the advantages of a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach to improve the level of information provided by GC×GC separation.

AB - The present study examines the ability of targeted and non-targeted methods to provide specific and complementary information on groups of samples on the basis of their component distribution on the two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) plane. The volatile fraction of Arabica green and roasted coffee samples differing in geographical origins and roasting treatments and the volatile fraction from juniper needles, sampled by headspace-solid phase microextraction, were analyzed by GC×GC-qMS and sample profiles processed by different approaches. In the target analysis profiling, samples submitted to different roasting cycles and/or differing in origin and post-harvest treatment are characterized on the basis of known constituents (botanical, technological, and/or aromatic markers). This approach provides highly reliable results on quali-quantitative compositional differences because of the authentic standard confirmation, extending and improving the specificity of the comparative procedure to trace and minor components. On the other hand, non-targeted data-processing methods (e.g., direct image comparison and template-based fingerprinting) include in the sample comparisons and correlations all detected sample components, offering an increased discrimination potential by identifying compounds that are comparatively significant but not known targets. Results demonstrate the ability of GC×GC to explore in depth the complexity of samples and emphasize the advantages of a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach to improve the level of information provided by GC×GC separation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951444074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951444074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/chromsci/48.4.251

DO - 10.1093/chromsci/48.4.251

M3 - Article

C2 - 20412646

AN - SCOPUS:77951444074

VL - 48

SP - 251

EP - 261

JO - Journal of Chromatographic Science

JF - Journal of Chromatographic Science

SN - 0021-9665

IS - 4

ER -