Synthetic and natural speech processing by adults with or without aphasia: An investigation of attention allocation

Karen Hux, Mary Jo Mercure, Melissa Wood, Sarah Scharf, Carrie Vitko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A series of three experiments explored differences in attention allocation when adults with aphasia and adults without aphasia process natural and synthetic speech. Experiment 1 participants were 80 young adults, Experiment 2 participants were 90 adults in three age groups ranging from 20 to 79 years old, and Experiment 3 participants were 9 adults with aphasia and 9 adults without aphasia matched for age and education. In all three experiments, participants performed linguistically based single and dual tasks using natural and synthetic speech for stimulus presentation. Experiment 1 accuracy and reaction time results revealed that neurologically intact young adults have significantly greater difficulty comprehending single-syllable words presented via synthetic speech than via natural speech. Experiment 2 ANOVA computations confirmed that synthetic speech presentation resulted in significantly longer reaction times than natural speech presentation and that younger adults performed the experimental tasks significantly more rapidly than older adults. Experiment 3 results revealed significant differences in the processing speed of adults with aphasia and adults without aphasia after adjusting for motor speed differences through use of a covariate. Response speed discrepancies between participant groups increased with task complexity. Furthermore, adults with aphasia performed with substantially greater response speed variability than adults without aphasia across all tasks, but especially when listening to synthetic speech. These results support the notion that persons with aphasia are inefficient in their allocation of attention resources, and the findings have implications for using synthetic speech devices when comprehension is paramount.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-141
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology
Volume6
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1 1998

Fingerprint

Aphasia
Young Adult
Reaction Time
Resource Allocation
Analysis of Variance
Age Groups
Education
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Rehabilitation
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Synthetic and natural speech processing by adults with or without aphasia : An investigation of attention allocation. / Hux, Karen; Mercure, Mary Jo; Wood, Melissa; Scharf, Sarah; Vitko, Carrie.

In: Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, Vol. 6, No. 3, 01.09.1998, p. 123-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bb6b2040f98140b2b7333073ec813b8f,
title = "Synthetic and natural speech processing by adults with or without aphasia: An investigation of attention allocation",
abstract = "A series of three experiments explored differences in attention allocation when adults with aphasia and adults without aphasia process natural and synthetic speech. Experiment 1 participants were 80 young adults, Experiment 2 participants were 90 adults in three age groups ranging from 20 to 79 years old, and Experiment 3 participants were 9 adults with aphasia and 9 adults without aphasia matched for age and education. In all three experiments, participants performed linguistically based single and dual tasks using natural and synthetic speech for stimulus presentation. Experiment 1 accuracy and reaction time results revealed that neurologically intact young adults have significantly greater difficulty comprehending single-syllable words presented via synthetic speech than via natural speech. Experiment 2 ANOVA computations confirmed that synthetic speech presentation resulted in significantly longer reaction times than natural speech presentation and that younger adults performed the experimental tasks significantly more rapidly than older adults. Experiment 3 results revealed significant differences in the processing speed of adults with aphasia and adults without aphasia after adjusting for motor speed differences through use of a covariate. Response speed discrepancies between participant groups increased with task complexity. Furthermore, adults with aphasia performed with substantially greater response speed variability than adults without aphasia across all tasks, but especially when listening to synthetic speech. These results support the notion that persons with aphasia are inefficient in their allocation of attention resources, and the findings have implications for using synthetic speech devices when comprehension is paramount.",
author = "Karen Hux and Mercure, {Mary Jo} and Melissa Wood and Sarah Scharf and Carrie Vitko",
year = "1998",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "123--141",
journal = "Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology",
issn = "1065-1438",
publisher = "Delmar Learning",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Synthetic and natural speech processing by adults with or without aphasia

T2 - An investigation of attention allocation

AU - Hux, Karen

AU - Mercure, Mary Jo

AU - Wood, Melissa

AU - Scharf, Sarah

AU - Vitko, Carrie

PY - 1998/9/1

Y1 - 1998/9/1

N2 - A series of three experiments explored differences in attention allocation when adults with aphasia and adults without aphasia process natural and synthetic speech. Experiment 1 participants were 80 young adults, Experiment 2 participants were 90 adults in three age groups ranging from 20 to 79 years old, and Experiment 3 participants were 9 adults with aphasia and 9 adults without aphasia matched for age and education. In all three experiments, participants performed linguistically based single and dual tasks using natural and synthetic speech for stimulus presentation. Experiment 1 accuracy and reaction time results revealed that neurologically intact young adults have significantly greater difficulty comprehending single-syllable words presented via synthetic speech than via natural speech. Experiment 2 ANOVA computations confirmed that synthetic speech presentation resulted in significantly longer reaction times than natural speech presentation and that younger adults performed the experimental tasks significantly more rapidly than older adults. Experiment 3 results revealed significant differences in the processing speed of adults with aphasia and adults without aphasia after adjusting for motor speed differences through use of a covariate. Response speed discrepancies between participant groups increased with task complexity. Furthermore, adults with aphasia performed with substantially greater response speed variability than adults without aphasia across all tasks, but especially when listening to synthetic speech. These results support the notion that persons with aphasia are inefficient in their allocation of attention resources, and the findings have implications for using synthetic speech devices when comprehension is paramount.

AB - A series of three experiments explored differences in attention allocation when adults with aphasia and adults without aphasia process natural and synthetic speech. Experiment 1 participants were 80 young adults, Experiment 2 participants were 90 adults in three age groups ranging from 20 to 79 years old, and Experiment 3 participants were 9 adults with aphasia and 9 adults without aphasia matched for age and education. In all three experiments, participants performed linguistically based single and dual tasks using natural and synthetic speech for stimulus presentation. Experiment 1 accuracy and reaction time results revealed that neurologically intact young adults have significantly greater difficulty comprehending single-syllable words presented via synthetic speech than via natural speech. Experiment 2 ANOVA computations confirmed that synthetic speech presentation resulted in significantly longer reaction times than natural speech presentation and that younger adults performed the experimental tasks significantly more rapidly than older adults. Experiment 3 results revealed significant differences in the processing speed of adults with aphasia and adults without aphasia after adjusting for motor speed differences through use of a covariate. Response speed discrepancies between participant groups increased with task complexity. Furthermore, adults with aphasia performed with substantially greater response speed variability than adults without aphasia across all tasks, but especially when listening to synthetic speech. These results support the notion that persons with aphasia are inefficient in their allocation of attention resources, and the findings have implications for using synthetic speech devices when comprehension is paramount.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0010416692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0010416692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0010416692

VL - 6

SP - 123

EP - 141

JO - Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology

JF - Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology

SN - 1065-1438

IS - 3

ER -