Swapping space for time and unfair tests of ecological models

Andrew J. Tyre, Brigitte Tenhumberg, Michael A. Mccarthy, Hugh P. Possingham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Testing ecological models for management is an increasingly important part of the maturation of ecology as an applied science. Consequently, we need to work at applying fair tests of models with adequate data. We demonstrate that a recent test of a discrete time, stochastic model was biased towards falsifying the predictions. If the model was a perfect description of reality, the test falsified the predictions 84% of the time. We introduce an alternative testing procedure for stochastic models, and show that it falsifies the predictions only 5% of the time when the model is a perfect description of reality. The example is used as a point of departure to discuss some of the philosophical aspects of model testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-331
Number of pages5
JournalAustral Ecology
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2000

Fingerprint

space and time
testing
prediction
applied science
test
maturation
ecology

Keywords

  • Adaptive management
  • Power test
  • Sorghum brachypodum
  • Standard deviate
  • Stochastic population model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

Swapping space for time and unfair tests of ecological models. / Tyre, Andrew J.; Tenhumberg, Brigitte; Mccarthy, Michael A.; Possingham, Hugh P.

In: Austral Ecology, Vol. 25, No. 4, 08.2000, p. 327-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tyre, Andrew J. ; Tenhumberg, Brigitte ; Mccarthy, Michael A. ; Possingham, Hugh P. / Swapping space for time and unfair tests of ecological models. In: Austral Ecology. 2000 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 327-331.
@article{b223059849dd451894bb4e77e6a1ca6a,
title = "Swapping space for time and unfair tests of ecological models",
abstract = "Testing ecological models for management is an increasingly important part of the maturation of ecology as an applied science. Consequently, we need to work at applying fair tests of models with adequate data. We demonstrate that a recent test of a discrete time, stochastic model was biased towards falsifying the predictions. If the model was a perfect description of reality, the test falsified the predictions 84{\%} of the time. We introduce an alternative testing procedure for stochastic models, and show that it falsifies the predictions only 5{\%} of the time when the model is a perfect description of reality. The example is used as a point of departure to discuss some of the philosophical aspects of model testing.",
keywords = "Adaptive management, Power test, Sorghum brachypodum, Standard deviate, Stochastic population model",
author = "Tyre, {Andrew J.} and Brigitte Tenhumberg and Mccarthy, {Michael A.} and Possingham, {Hugh P.}",
year = "2000",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1442-9993.2000.tb00037.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "327--331",
journal = "Austral Ecology",
issn = "1442-9985",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Swapping space for time and unfair tests of ecological models

AU - Tyre, Andrew J.

AU - Tenhumberg, Brigitte

AU - Mccarthy, Michael A.

AU - Possingham, Hugh P.

PY - 2000/8

Y1 - 2000/8

N2 - Testing ecological models for management is an increasingly important part of the maturation of ecology as an applied science. Consequently, we need to work at applying fair tests of models with adequate data. We demonstrate that a recent test of a discrete time, stochastic model was biased towards falsifying the predictions. If the model was a perfect description of reality, the test falsified the predictions 84% of the time. We introduce an alternative testing procedure for stochastic models, and show that it falsifies the predictions only 5% of the time when the model is a perfect description of reality. The example is used as a point of departure to discuss some of the philosophical aspects of model testing.

AB - Testing ecological models for management is an increasingly important part of the maturation of ecology as an applied science. Consequently, we need to work at applying fair tests of models with adequate data. We demonstrate that a recent test of a discrete time, stochastic model was biased towards falsifying the predictions. If the model was a perfect description of reality, the test falsified the predictions 84% of the time. We introduce an alternative testing procedure for stochastic models, and show that it falsifies the predictions only 5% of the time when the model is a perfect description of reality. The example is used as a point of departure to discuss some of the philosophical aspects of model testing.

KW - Adaptive management

KW - Power test

KW - Sorghum brachypodum

KW - Standard deviate

KW - Stochastic population model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347743800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347743800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2000.tb00037.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2000.tb00037.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0347743800

VL - 25

SP - 327

EP - 331

JO - Austral Ecology

JF - Austral Ecology

SN - 1442-9985

IS - 4

ER -