Surgical team workload comparison for 4-port and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures

Bethany R Lowndes, Amro M. Abdelrahman, Cornelius A. Thiels, Amani O. Mohamed, Andrea L. McConico, Juliane Bingener, M. Susan Hallbeck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Advanced minimally invasive procedures may cause postural constraints and increased workload and stress for providers. This study compared workload and stress across surgical team roles for 48 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (4-port vs single-port)using a task load index (NASA-TLX), a procedural difficulty question, and salivary stress hormones. Statistical analyses were performed based on the presence intra-cluster correlation within team roles, at α=0.05. The single-port technique resulted in an 89% increase in physical workload for the surgeon and 63% increase for the assistant (both p<0.05). The surgeon had significantly higher salivary stress hormones during single-port surgeries. The degree of procedural difficulty was positively correlated between the surgeon and most roles: resident (r=0.67), assistant (r=0.81), and technician (r=0.81). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the surgeon and assistant for all selfreported workload measures (p<0.05). The single-port technique requires further improvement to balance surgical team workload for optimal patient safety and satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-285
Number of pages9
JournalApplied Ergonomics
Volume78
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Workload
workload
assistant
Hormones
United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Surgery
technician
NASA
Patient Safety
Patient Satisfaction
surgery
resident
cause
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
  • Surgical Team
  • Workload

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Engineering (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Lowndes, B. R., Abdelrahman, A. M., Thiels, C. A., Mohamed, A. O., McConico, A. L., Bingener, J., & Hallbeck, M. S. (2019). Surgical team workload comparison for 4-port and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. Applied Ergonomics, 78, 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.005

Surgical team workload comparison for 4-port and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. / Lowndes, Bethany R; Abdelrahman, Amro M.; Thiels, Cornelius A.; Mohamed, Amani O.; McConico, Andrea L.; Bingener, Juliane; Hallbeck, M. Susan.

In: Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 78, 07.2019, p. 277-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lowndes, BR, Abdelrahman, AM, Thiels, CA, Mohamed, AO, McConico, AL, Bingener, J & Hallbeck, MS 2019, 'Surgical team workload comparison for 4-port and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures', Applied Ergonomics, vol. 78, pp. 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.005
Lowndes, Bethany R ; Abdelrahman, Amro M. ; Thiels, Cornelius A. ; Mohamed, Amani O. ; McConico, Andrea L. ; Bingener, Juliane ; Hallbeck, M. Susan. / Surgical team workload comparison for 4-port and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. In: Applied Ergonomics. 2019 ; Vol. 78. pp. 277-285.
@article{7aaddf69f63743f2a1bc9cecbcf17bdb,
title = "Surgical team workload comparison for 4-port and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures",
abstract = "Advanced minimally invasive procedures may cause postural constraints and increased workload and stress for providers. This study compared workload and stress across surgical team roles for 48 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (4-port vs single-port)using a task load index (NASA-TLX), a procedural difficulty question, and salivary stress hormones. Statistical analyses were performed based on the presence intra-cluster correlation within team roles, at α=0.05. The single-port technique resulted in an 89{\%} increase in physical workload for the surgeon and 63{\%} increase for the assistant (both p<0.05). The surgeon had significantly higher salivary stress hormones during single-port surgeries. The degree of procedural difficulty was positively correlated between the surgeon and most roles: resident (r=0.67), assistant (r=0.81), and technician (r=0.81). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the surgeon and assistant for all selfreported workload measures (p<0.05). The single-port technique requires further improvement to balance surgical team workload for optimal patient safety and satisfaction.",
keywords = "Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Surgical Team, Workload",
author = "Lowndes, {Bethany R} and Abdelrahman, {Amro M.} and Thiels, {Cornelius A.} and Mohamed, {Amani O.} and McConico, {Andrea L.} and Juliane Bingener and Hallbeck, {M. Susan}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "277--285",
journal = "Applied Ergonomics",
issn = "0003-6870",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical team workload comparison for 4-port and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures

AU - Lowndes, Bethany R

AU - Abdelrahman, Amro M.

AU - Thiels, Cornelius A.

AU - Mohamed, Amani O.

AU - McConico, Andrea L.

AU - Bingener, Juliane

AU - Hallbeck, M. Susan

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - Advanced minimally invasive procedures may cause postural constraints and increased workload and stress for providers. This study compared workload and stress across surgical team roles for 48 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (4-port vs single-port)using a task load index (NASA-TLX), a procedural difficulty question, and salivary stress hormones. Statistical analyses were performed based on the presence intra-cluster correlation within team roles, at α=0.05. The single-port technique resulted in an 89% increase in physical workload for the surgeon and 63% increase for the assistant (both p<0.05). The surgeon had significantly higher salivary stress hormones during single-port surgeries. The degree of procedural difficulty was positively correlated between the surgeon and most roles: resident (r=0.67), assistant (r=0.81), and technician (r=0.81). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the surgeon and assistant for all selfreported workload measures (p<0.05). The single-port technique requires further improvement to balance surgical team workload for optimal patient safety and satisfaction.

AB - Advanced minimally invasive procedures may cause postural constraints and increased workload and stress for providers. This study compared workload and stress across surgical team roles for 48 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (4-port vs single-port)using a task load index (NASA-TLX), a procedural difficulty question, and salivary stress hormones. Statistical analyses were performed based on the presence intra-cluster correlation within team roles, at α=0.05. The single-port technique resulted in an 89% increase in physical workload for the surgeon and 63% increase for the assistant (both p<0.05). The surgeon had significantly higher salivary stress hormones during single-port surgeries. The degree of procedural difficulty was positively correlated between the surgeon and most roles: resident (r=0.67), assistant (r=0.81), and technician (r=0.81). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the surgeon and assistant for all selfreported workload measures (p<0.05). The single-port technique requires further improvement to balance surgical team workload for optimal patient safety and satisfaction.

KW - Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

KW - Surgical Team

KW - Workload

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048998214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048998214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.005

DO - 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 29960648

AN - SCOPUS:85048998214

VL - 78

SP - 277

EP - 285

JO - Applied Ergonomics

JF - Applied Ergonomics

SN - 0003-6870

ER -