Supplementing floundering text with adjunct displays

Kenneth A. Kiewra, Douglas F. Kauffman, Daniel H. Robinson, Nelson F. Dubois, Richard K. Staley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three experiments compared the learning potential of text versus outline and matrix displays. In Experiments 1 and 2, college students read or heard a passage about fish and then studied the text, an outline, or a matrix. In Experiment 3, students heard a passage about wildcats, and then studied text, outline, or matrix displays. In all experiments, the text, outline, and matrix formats were informationally equivalent. However, the two-dimensional matrix appeared more computationally efficient than the linear organized text or outline because it (a) positioned related information about fish or wildcats in closer proximity so that local relations within a single category (such as "size") were learned, and (b) organized information spatially so that global relations across categories (such as size and diet) were learned. The learning potential of text, outline, and matrix displays was also examined in combination with variations in thematic organization, amount of study time, and time of testing. The most important and consistent findings were that (a) outline and matrix displays produced greater relational learning than the text, and (b) matrix displays produced greater relational learning than outlines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)373-401
Number of pages29
JournalInstructional Science
Volume27
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

Fingerprint

Learning
Fishes
Students
experiment
learning
organization of studies
Diet
student
time

Keywords

  • Graphic organizers
  • Spatial representations
  • Text learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Kiewra, K. A., Kauffman, D. F., Robinson, D. H., Dubois, N. F., & Staley, R. K. (1999). Supplementing floundering text with adjunct displays. Instructional Science, 27(5), 373-401.

Supplementing floundering text with adjunct displays. / Kiewra, Kenneth A.; Kauffman, Douglas F.; Robinson, Daniel H.; Dubois, Nelson F.; Staley, Richard K.

In: Instructional Science, Vol. 27, No. 5, 01.01.1999, p. 373-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kiewra, KA, Kauffman, DF, Robinson, DH, Dubois, NF & Staley, RK 1999, 'Supplementing floundering text with adjunct displays', Instructional Science, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 373-401.
Kiewra KA, Kauffman DF, Robinson DH, Dubois NF, Staley RK. Supplementing floundering text with adjunct displays. Instructional Science. 1999 Jan 1;27(5):373-401.
Kiewra, Kenneth A. ; Kauffman, Douglas F. ; Robinson, Daniel H. ; Dubois, Nelson F. ; Staley, Richard K. / Supplementing floundering text with adjunct displays. In: Instructional Science. 1999 ; Vol. 27, No. 5. pp. 373-401.
@article{9f9b0d67e37b47a7b84cfa2bc61d97bc,
title = "Supplementing floundering text with adjunct displays",
abstract = "Three experiments compared the learning potential of text versus outline and matrix displays. In Experiments 1 and 2, college students read or heard a passage about fish and then studied the text, an outline, or a matrix. In Experiment 3, students heard a passage about wildcats, and then studied text, outline, or matrix displays. In all experiments, the text, outline, and matrix formats were informationally equivalent. However, the two-dimensional matrix appeared more computationally efficient than the linear organized text or outline because it (a) positioned related information about fish or wildcats in closer proximity so that local relations within a single category (such as {"}size{"}) were learned, and (b) organized information spatially so that global relations across categories (such as size and diet) were learned. The learning potential of text, outline, and matrix displays was also examined in combination with variations in thematic organization, amount of study time, and time of testing. The most important and consistent findings were that (a) outline and matrix displays produced greater relational learning than the text, and (b) matrix displays produced greater relational learning than outlines.",
keywords = "Graphic organizers, Spatial representations, Text learning",
author = "Kiewra, {Kenneth A.} and Kauffman, {Douglas F.} and Robinson, {Daniel H.} and Dubois, {Nelson F.} and Staley, {Richard K.}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "373--401",
journal = "Instructional Science",
issn = "0020-4277",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supplementing floundering text with adjunct displays

AU - Kiewra, Kenneth A.

AU - Kauffman, Douglas F.

AU - Robinson, Daniel H.

AU - Dubois, Nelson F.

AU - Staley, Richard K.

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - Three experiments compared the learning potential of text versus outline and matrix displays. In Experiments 1 and 2, college students read or heard a passage about fish and then studied the text, an outline, or a matrix. In Experiment 3, students heard a passage about wildcats, and then studied text, outline, or matrix displays. In all experiments, the text, outline, and matrix formats were informationally equivalent. However, the two-dimensional matrix appeared more computationally efficient than the linear organized text or outline because it (a) positioned related information about fish or wildcats in closer proximity so that local relations within a single category (such as "size") were learned, and (b) organized information spatially so that global relations across categories (such as size and diet) were learned. The learning potential of text, outline, and matrix displays was also examined in combination with variations in thematic organization, amount of study time, and time of testing. The most important and consistent findings were that (a) outline and matrix displays produced greater relational learning than the text, and (b) matrix displays produced greater relational learning than outlines.

AB - Three experiments compared the learning potential of text versus outline and matrix displays. In Experiments 1 and 2, college students read or heard a passage about fish and then studied the text, an outline, or a matrix. In Experiment 3, students heard a passage about wildcats, and then studied text, outline, or matrix displays. In all experiments, the text, outline, and matrix formats were informationally equivalent. However, the two-dimensional matrix appeared more computationally efficient than the linear organized text or outline because it (a) positioned related information about fish or wildcats in closer proximity so that local relations within a single category (such as "size") were learned, and (b) organized information spatially so that global relations across categories (such as size and diet) were learned. The learning potential of text, outline, and matrix displays was also examined in combination with variations in thematic organization, amount of study time, and time of testing. The most important and consistent findings were that (a) outline and matrix displays produced greater relational learning than the text, and (b) matrix displays produced greater relational learning than outlines.

KW - Graphic organizers

KW - Spatial representations

KW - Text learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033449498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033449498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033449498

VL - 27

SP - 373

EP - 401

JO - Instructional Science

JF - Instructional Science

SN - 0020-4277

IS - 5

ER -