Summit of the research coordination networks for undergraduate biology education

Carrie Diaz Eaton, Deborah Allen, Laurel J. Anderson, Gillian Bowser, Mark A Pauley, Kathy S. Williams, Gordon E. Uno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The first summit of projects funded by the National Science Foundation’s Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education (RCN-UBE) program was held January 14–16,2016,in Washington,DC. Sixty-five scientists and science educators from 38 of the 41 Incubator and Full RCN-UBE awards discussed the value and contributions of RCNs to the national biology education reform effort. The summit illustrated the progress of this innovative UBE track,first awarded in 2009. Participants shared experiences regarding network development and growth,identified best practices and challenges faced in network management,and discussed work accomplished. We report here on key aspects of network evaluation,characteristics of successful networks,and how to sustain and broaden participation in networks. Evidence from successful networks indicates that 5 years (the length of a Full RCN-UBE) may be insufficient time to produce a cohesive and effective network. While online communication promotes the activities of a network and disseminates effective practices,face-to-face meetings are critical for establishing ties between network participants. Creation of these National Science Foundation–funded networks may be particularly useful for consortia of faculty working to address problems or exchange novel solutions discovered while introducing active-learning methods and/ or course-based research into their curricula.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbermr1
JournalCBE Life Sciences Education
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

research coordination
biology
Education
Research
education
Incubators
Problem-Based Learning
Network management
Growth and Development
Practice Guidelines
Curriculum
Curricula
Communication
science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Eaton, C. D., Allen, D., Anderson, L. J., Bowser, G., Pauley, M. A., Williams, K. S., & Uno, G. E. (2016). Summit of the research coordination networks for undergraduate biology education. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), [mr1]. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0147

Summit of the research coordination networks for undergraduate biology education. / Eaton, Carrie Diaz; Allen, Deborah; Anderson, Laurel J.; Bowser, Gillian; Pauley, Mark A; Williams, Kathy S.; Uno, Gordon E.

In: CBE Life Sciences Education, Vol. 15, No. 4, mr1, 01.12.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eaton, Carrie Diaz ; Allen, Deborah ; Anderson, Laurel J. ; Bowser, Gillian ; Pauley, Mark A ; Williams, Kathy S. ; Uno, Gordon E. / Summit of the research coordination networks for undergraduate biology education. In: CBE Life Sciences Education. 2016 ; Vol. 15, No. 4.
@article{778a3e8d022047c3bc821017fbd75d9a,
title = "Summit of the research coordination networks for undergraduate biology education",
abstract = "The first summit of projects funded by the National Science Foundation’s Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education (RCN-UBE) program was held January 14–16,2016,in Washington,DC. Sixty-five scientists and science educators from 38 of the 41 Incubator and Full RCN-UBE awards discussed the value and contributions of RCNs to the national biology education reform effort. The summit illustrated the progress of this innovative UBE track,first awarded in 2009. Participants shared experiences regarding network development and growth,identified best practices and challenges faced in network management,and discussed work accomplished. We report here on key aspects of network evaluation,characteristics of successful networks,and how to sustain and broaden participation in networks. Evidence from successful networks indicates that 5 years (the length of a Full RCN-UBE) may be insufficient time to produce a cohesive and effective network. While online communication promotes the activities of a network and disseminates effective practices,face-to-face meetings are critical for establishing ties between network participants. Creation of these National Science Foundation–funded networks may be particularly useful for consortia of faculty working to address problems or exchange novel solutions discovered while introducing active-learning methods and/ or course-based research into their curricula.",
author = "Eaton, {Carrie Diaz} and Deborah Allen and Anderson, {Laurel J.} and Gillian Bowser and Pauley, {Mark A} and Williams, {Kathy S.} and Uno, {Gordon E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1187/cbe.16-03-0147",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "CBE Life Sciences Education",
issn = "1931-7913",
publisher = "American Society for Cell Biology",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Summit of the research coordination networks for undergraduate biology education

AU - Eaton, Carrie Diaz

AU - Allen, Deborah

AU - Anderson, Laurel J.

AU - Bowser, Gillian

AU - Pauley, Mark A

AU - Williams, Kathy S.

AU - Uno, Gordon E.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - The first summit of projects funded by the National Science Foundation’s Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education (RCN-UBE) program was held January 14–16,2016,in Washington,DC. Sixty-five scientists and science educators from 38 of the 41 Incubator and Full RCN-UBE awards discussed the value and contributions of RCNs to the national biology education reform effort. The summit illustrated the progress of this innovative UBE track,first awarded in 2009. Participants shared experiences regarding network development and growth,identified best practices and challenges faced in network management,and discussed work accomplished. We report here on key aspects of network evaluation,characteristics of successful networks,and how to sustain and broaden participation in networks. Evidence from successful networks indicates that 5 years (the length of a Full RCN-UBE) may be insufficient time to produce a cohesive and effective network. While online communication promotes the activities of a network and disseminates effective practices,face-to-face meetings are critical for establishing ties between network participants. Creation of these National Science Foundation–funded networks may be particularly useful for consortia of faculty working to address problems or exchange novel solutions discovered while introducing active-learning methods and/ or course-based research into their curricula.

AB - The first summit of projects funded by the National Science Foundation’s Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education (RCN-UBE) program was held January 14–16,2016,in Washington,DC. Sixty-five scientists and science educators from 38 of the 41 Incubator and Full RCN-UBE awards discussed the value and contributions of RCNs to the national biology education reform effort. The summit illustrated the progress of this innovative UBE track,first awarded in 2009. Participants shared experiences regarding network development and growth,identified best practices and challenges faced in network management,and discussed work accomplished. We report here on key aspects of network evaluation,characteristics of successful networks,and how to sustain and broaden participation in networks. Evidence from successful networks indicates that 5 years (the length of a Full RCN-UBE) may be insufficient time to produce a cohesive and effective network. While online communication promotes the activities of a network and disseminates effective practices,face-to-face meetings are critical for establishing ties between network participants. Creation of these National Science Foundation–funded networks may be particularly useful for consortia of faculty working to address problems or exchange novel solutions discovered while introducing active-learning methods and/ or course-based research into their curricula.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996529444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84996529444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0147

DO - 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0147

M3 - Article

VL - 15

JO - CBE Life Sciences Education

JF - CBE Life Sciences Education

SN - 1931-7913

IS - 4

M1 - mr1

ER -