SU‐GG‐J‐98: Study of Patient Setup Error and Inter‐Fractional Organ Motion for Prostatectomy Patients Using CT‐on‐Rails

Sumin Zhou, Sicong Li, S. Chen, H. Deng, M. Zhang, L. Schubert, H. du, Andrew O Wahl, Charles Arthur Enke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: A retrospective study was conducted on daily translation corrections of patient positioning based on CT‐On‐Rails technology to improve our external beam radiotherapy QA program for prostatectomy patients. Methods and Materials: 479 daily translational corrections obtained from 13 consecutive prostatectomy patients were considered. Before each treatment, each patient immobilized in vacuum bag was positioned based on skin markers. After which a 3D daily CT image of the patient was acquired using CT‐On‐Rails. Translational correction in lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions were obtained by matching soft tissues surrounding patient's prostate bed region in the daily and treatment planning CT images. These corrections reflect the combined positioning error from manual setup and inter‐fractional organ motion/deformation. Basic statistical analysis of these corrections was performed. ANOVA analysis using the translational corrections as response variables and week days or patient study ID as explanatory variables were performed to search for possible dependence of positioning error on individual patient and weekday. Results: Average patient positioning errors in lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions were small (−0.4mm, 1.4mm, and −0.1mm respectively with standard deviations of 5.4mm, 5.0mm, and 7.3mm). The two statistically significant (p<0.05) but weak correlations were observed between corrections in longitudinal and lateral directions (r = 0.10), and between longitudinal and vertical directions (r=0.18). ANOVA analysis showed statistically significant (p<0.05) difference in individual patient positioning error in all three directions. No such finding was observed for weekdays. Conclusions: For prostatectomy patients, without CT‐On‐Rails, the patient positioning error was patient dependent and the biggest uncertainty was in patient anterior/posterior direction. The performance of our therapists was consistent without significant residual patient setup error. CT‐on‐rails based imaging guidance before individual prostatectomy patient daily radiotherapy was effective in patient positioning error reduction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3167-3168
Number of pages2
JournalMedical physics
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Patient Positioning
Analysis of Variance
Radiotherapy
Vacuum
Individuality
Uncertainty
Direction compound
Prostate
Retrospective Studies
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐GG‐J‐98 : Study of Patient Setup Error and Inter‐Fractional Organ Motion for Prostatectomy Patients Using CT‐on‐Rails. / Zhou, Sumin; Li, Sicong; Chen, S.; Deng, H.; Zhang, M.; Schubert, L.; du, H.; Wahl, Andrew O; Enke, Charles Arthur.

In: Medical physics, Vol. 37, No. 6, 06.2010, p. 3167-3168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3b68a6fd381e47459eb1a206ff48abe8,
title = "SU‐GG‐J‐98: Study of Patient Setup Error and Inter‐Fractional Organ Motion for Prostatectomy Patients Using CT‐on‐Rails",
abstract = "Purpose: A retrospective study was conducted on daily translation corrections of patient positioning based on CT‐On‐Rails technology to improve our external beam radiotherapy QA program for prostatectomy patients. Methods and Materials: 479 daily translational corrections obtained from 13 consecutive prostatectomy patients were considered. Before each treatment, each patient immobilized in vacuum bag was positioned based on skin markers. After which a 3D daily CT image of the patient was acquired using CT‐On‐Rails. Translational correction in lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions were obtained by matching soft tissues surrounding patient's prostate bed region in the daily and treatment planning CT images. These corrections reflect the combined positioning error from manual setup and inter‐fractional organ motion/deformation. Basic statistical analysis of these corrections was performed. ANOVA analysis using the translational corrections as response variables and week days or patient study ID as explanatory variables were performed to search for possible dependence of positioning error on individual patient and weekday. Results: Average patient positioning errors in lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions were small (−0.4mm, 1.4mm, and −0.1mm respectively with standard deviations of 5.4mm, 5.0mm, and 7.3mm). The two statistically significant (p<0.05) but weak correlations were observed between corrections in longitudinal and lateral directions (r = 0.10), and between longitudinal and vertical directions (r=0.18). ANOVA analysis showed statistically significant (p<0.05) difference in individual patient positioning error in all three directions. No such finding was observed for weekdays. Conclusions: For prostatectomy patients, without CT‐On‐Rails, the patient positioning error was patient dependent and the biggest uncertainty was in patient anterior/posterior direction. The performance of our therapists was consistent without significant residual patient setup error. CT‐on‐rails based imaging guidance before individual prostatectomy patient daily radiotherapy was effective in patient positioning error reduction.",
author = "Sumin Zhou and Sicong Li and S. Chen and H. Deng and M. Zhang and L. Schubert and H. du and Wahl, {Andrew O} and Enke, {Charles Arthur}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1118/1.3468322",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "3167--3168",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐GG‐J‐98

T2 - Study of Patient Setup Error and Inter‐Fractional Organ Motion for Prostatectomy Patients Using CT‐on‐Rails

AU - Zhou, Sumin

AU - Li, Sicong

AU - Chen, S.

AU - Deng, H.

AU - Zhang, M.

AU - Schubert, L.

AU - du, H.

AU - Wahl, Andrew O

AU - Enke, Charles Arthur

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Purpose: A retrospective study was conducted on daily translation corrections of patient positioning based on CT‐On‐Rails technology to improve our external beam radiotherapy QA program for prostatectomy patients. Methods and Materials: 479 daily translational corrections obtained from 13 consecutive prostatectomy patients were considered. Before each treatment, each patient immobilized in vacuum bag was positioned based on skin markers. After which a 3D daily CT image of the patient was acquired using CT‐On‐Rails. Translational correction in lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions were obtained by matching soft tissues surrounding patient's prostate bed region in the daily and treatment planning CT images. These corrections reflect the combined positioning error from manual setup and inter‐fractional organ motion/deformation. Basic statistical analysis of these corrections was performed. ANOVA analysis using the translational corrections as response variables and week days or patient study ID as explanatory variables were performed to search for possible dependence of positioning error on individual patient and weekday. Results: Average patient positioning errors in lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions were small (−0.4mm, 1.4mm, and −0.1mm respectively with standard deviations of 5.4mm, 5.0mm, and 7.3mm). The two statistically significant (p<0.05) but weak correlations were observed between corrections in longitudinal and lateral directions (r = 0.10), and between longitudinal and vertical directions (r=0.18). ANOVA analysis showed statistically significant (p<0.05) difference in individual patient positioning error in all three directions. No such finding was observed for weekdays. Conclusions: For prostatectomy patients, without CT‐On‐Rails, the patient positioning error was patient dependent and the biggest uncertainty was in patient anterior/posterior direction. The performance of our therapists was consistent without significant residual patient setup error. CT‐on‐rails based imaging guidance before individual prostatectomy patient daily radiotherapy was effective in patient positioning error reduction.

AB - Purpose: A retrospective study was conducted on daily translation corrections of patient positioning based on CT‐On‐Rails technology to improve our external beam radiotherapy QA program for prostatectomy patients. Methods and Materials: 479 daily translational corrections obtained from 13 consecutive prostatectomy patients were considered. Before each treatment, each patient immobilized in vacuum bag was positioned based on skin markers. After which a 3D daily CT image of the patient was acquired using CT‐On‐Rails. Translational correction in lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions were obtained by matching soft tissues surrounding patient's prostate bed region in the daily and treatment planning CT images. These corrections reflect the combined positioning error from manual setup and inter‐fractional organ motion/deformation. Basic statistical analysis of these corrections was performed. ANOVA analysis using the translational corrections as response variables and week days or patient study ID as explanatory variables were performed to search for possible dependence of positioning error on individual patient and weekday. Results: Average patient positioning errors in lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions were small (−0.4mm, 1.4mm, and −0.1mm respectively with standard deviations of 5.4mm, 5.0mm, and 7.3mm). The two statistically significant (p<0.05) but weak correlations were observed between corrections in longitudinal and lateral directions (r = 0.10), and between longitudinal and vertical directions (r=0.18). ANOVA analysis showed statistically significant (p<0.05) difference in individual patient positioning error in all three directions. No such finding was observed for weekdays. Conclusions: For prostatectomy patients, without CT‐On‐Rails, the patient positioning error was patient dependent and the biggest uncertainty was in patient anterior/posterior direction. The performance of our therapists was consistent without significant residual patient setup error. CT‐on‐rails based imaging guidance before individual prostatectomy patient daily radiotherapy was effective in patient positioning error reduction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024799279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024799279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3468322

DO - 10.1118/1.3468322

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024799279

VL - 37

SP - 3167

EP - 3168

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -