SU‐FF‐T‐66

Comparison of IMRT Plans with Tissue Heterogeneity Corrections Using the Pinnacle3 and CORVUS Treatment Planning Systems

S. Pillai, K. Ayyangar, Sicong Li, R. Nehru, Weining Zhen, Charles Arthur Enke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To study and compare the results of IMRT plans with tissue heterogeneity corrections using the Pinnacle3 and CORVUS treatment planning systems (TPS). Method and Materials: A 30 cm × 30 cm × 15 cm solid water phantom embedded with a 7.5 cm styrofoam slab simulating air was scanned on Siemens Emotion Duo and the image set was transferred to both TPS for dose computation and analysis. A few clinical cases planned on the CORVUS were also transferred to Pinnacle3 and computed with heterogeneity corrections. Results: The dose profile along the central axis of a 23MV beam inside phantom was generated on both TPS and was compared with the Battista et al1 data from TG65. It is noted that a gradual build‐up effect after the in homogeneity region in the case of Pinnacle3 but it is not noticed in the case of CORVUS. In the case of clinical lung plan, CORVUS overestimated the dose homogeneity and uniformity in the target when compared to Pinnacle3 TPS. When re‐optimized and re‐computed on Pinnacle3 TPS, the target coverage on DVH was better than CORVUS. Discrepancies of 33% (relative to the prescribed target dose) in the target region were found in CORVUS TPS calculations. Conclusion: The FSPB algorithm as implemented in CORVUS results in significant under‐ or over‐estimation of the dose in some cases involving heterogeneities such as the air‐tissue, and lung‐tissue. Comparatively, the convolution algorithm in Pinnacle3 is far superior and takes into account the electronic disequilibrium due to tissue heterogeneity. This is in agreement with earlier published literature using Monte Carlo computations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1964
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Emotions
Air
Lung
Water
styrofoam

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{48fe7c461fb440948664dd965b5e20d4,
title = "SU‐FF‐T‐66: Comparison of IMRT Plans with Tissue Heterogeneity Corrections Using the Pinnacle3 and CORVUS Treatment Planning Systems",
abstract = "Purpose: To study and compare the results of IMRT plans with tissue heterogeneity corrections using the Pinnacle3 and CORVUS treatment planning systems (TPS). Method and Materials: A 30 cm × 30 cm × 15 cm solid water phantom embedded with a 7.5 cm styrofoam slab simulating air was scanned on Siemens Emotion Duo and the image set was transferred to both TPS for dose computation and analysis. A few clinical cases planned on the CORVUS were also transferred to Pinnacle3 and computed with heterogeneity corrections. Results: The dose profile along the central axis of a 23MV beam inside phantom was generated on both TPS and was compared with the Battista et al1 data from TG65. It is noted that a gradual build‐up effect after the in homogeneity region in the case of Pinnacle3 but it is not noticed in the case of CORVUS. In the case of clinical lung plan, CORVUS overestimated the dose homogeneity and uniformity in the target when compared to Pinnacle3 TPS. When re‐optimized and re‐computed on Pinnacle3 TPS, the target coverage on DVH was better than CORVUS. Discrepancies of 33{\%} (relative to the prescribed target dose) in the target region were found in CORVUS TPS calculations. Conclusion: The FSPB algorithm as implemented in CORVUS results in significant under‐ or over‐estimation of the dose in some cases involving heterogeneities such as the air‐tissue, and lung‐tissue. Comparatively, the convolution algorithm in Pinnacle3 is far superior and takes into account the electronic disequilibrium due to tissue heterogeneity. This is in agreement with earlier published literature using Monte Carlo computations.",
author = "S. Pillai and K. Ayyangar and Sicong Li and R. Nehru and Weining Zhen and Enke, {Charles Arthur}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1118/1.1997737",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1964",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐FF‐T‐66

T2 - Comparison of IMRT Plans with Tissue Heterogeneity Corrections Using the Pinnacle3 and CORVUS Treatment Planning Systems

AU - Pillai, S.

AU - Ayyangar, K.

AU - Li, Sicong

AU - Nehru, R.

AU - Zhen, Weining

AU - Enke, Charles Arthur

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Purpose: To study and compare the results of IMRT plans with tissue heterogeneity corrections using the Pinnacle3 and CORVUS treatment planning systems (TPS). Method and Materials: A 30 cm × 30 cm × 15 cm solid water phantom embedded with a 7.5 cm styrofoam slab simulating air was scanned on Siemens Emotion Duo and the image set was transferred to both TPS for dose computation and analysis. A few clinical cases planned on the CORVUS were also transferred to Pinnacle3 and computed with heterogeneity corrections. Results: The dose profile along the central axis of a 23MV beam inside phantom was generated on both TPS and was compared with the Battista et al1 data from TG65. It is noted that a gradual build‐up effect after the in homogeneity region in the case of Pinnacle3 but it is not noticed in the case of CORVUS. In the case of clinical lung plan, CORVUS overestimated the dose homogeneity and uniformity in the target when compared to Pinnacle3 TPS. When re‐optimized and re‐computed on Pinnacle3 TPS, the target coverage on DVH was better than CORVUS. Discrepancies of 33% (relative to the prescribed target dose) in the target region were found in CORVUS TPS calculations. Conclusion: The FSPB algorithm as implemented in CORVUS results in significant under‐ or over‐estimation of the dose in some cases involving heterogeneities such as the air‐tissue, and lung‐tissue. Comparatively, the convolution algorithm in Pinnacle3 is far superior and takes into account the electronic disequilibrium due to tissue heterogeneity. This is in agreement with earlier published literature using Monte Carlo computations.

AB - Purpose: To study and compare the results of IMRT plans with tissue heterogeneity corrections using the Pinnacle3 and CORVUS treatment planning systems (TPS). Method and Materials: A 30 cm × 30 cm × 15 cm solid water phantom embedded with a 7.5 cm styrofoam slab simulating air was scanned on Siemens Emotion Duo and the image set was transferred to both TPS for dose computation and analysis. A few clinical cases planned on the CORVUS were also transferred to Pinnacle3 and computed with heterogeneity corrections. Results: The dose profile along the central axis of a 23MV beam inside phantom was generated on both TPS and was compared with the Battista et al1 data from TG65. It is noted that a gradual build‐up effect after the in homogeneity region in the case of Pinnacle3 but it is not noticed in the case of CORVUS. In the case of clinical lung plan, CORVUS overestimated the dose homogeneity and uniformity in the target when compared to Pinnacle3 TPS. When re‐optimized and re‐computed on Pinnacle3 TPS, the target coverage on DVH was better than CORVUS. Discrepancies of 33% (relative to the prescribed target dose) in the target region were found in CORVUS TPS calculations. Conclusion: The FSPB algorithm as implemented in CORVUS results in significant under‐ or over‐estimation of the dose in some cases involving heterogeneities such as the air‐tissue, and lung‐tissue. Comparatively, the convolution algorithm in Pinnacle3 is far superior and takes into account the electronic disequilibrium due to tissue heterogeneity. This is in agreement with earlier published literature using Monte Carlo computations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024810855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024810855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.1997737

DO - 10.1118/1.1997737

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1964

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -