SU‐E‐T‐206

Standardization in Documentation Format Can Significantly Reduce Manual Data Entry Error in Patient Chart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To demonstrate that standardization in documentation format can significantly reduce manual data entry error in patient chart. Method and Materials: Due to lack of direct data link between CT on rail imaging registration software and patient R&V system, therapists have to manually enter translation correction of patient position into R&V system after performing imaging registration between CT image taken just before treatment delivery and treatment planning CT image. Approximately six months after CT on rail was placed into clinical service, we started requiring therapists to use a standard format to document the shifts when they manually enter data to reduce manual data entry error rate. The therapist manual data entry errors in R&V system before (551 entries) and after the format standardization (1645 entries) are the subjects of statistical analysis. The errors are divided into two categories (recoverable and non‐recoverable errors) depending on whether a human being can recover the translation shifts in lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions from the therapist notes. Fisher's exact test is performed to test the statistical significance of therapist's data entry error reduction after our imposing the documentation format requirement. Temporal information on when the errors were made is also analyzed to find out when errors are more likely to happen. Results: Statistical analysis indicated that reductions in the numbers of recoverable, non‐recoverable, and total errors after standardization in document format are all statistically significant with p values less than 0.05. Conclusion: A simple and low cost measure like standardization in document format can significantly reduce the errors operators introduce to patient R&V system when they perform manual data entry. We hope our experience will convince people to follow more disciplined documentation rule to reduce the error rate and therefore potentially can improve the quality of patient care when manual data entry is involved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical physics
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Documentation
Quality of Health Care
Patient Care
Software
Costs and Cost Analysis
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{bfccb9f068f942fdae2c548d9f27c617,
title = "SU‐E‐T‐206: Standardization in Documentation Format Can Significantly Reduce Manual Data Entry Error in Patient Chart",
abstract = "Purpose: To demonstrate that standardization in documentation format can significantly reduce manual data entry error in patient chart. Method and Materials: Due to lack of direct data link between CT on rail imaging registration software and patient R&V system, therapists have to manually enter translation correction of patient position into R&V system after performing imaging registration between CT image taken just before treatment delivery and treatment planning CT image. Approximately six months after CT on rail was placed into clinical service, we started requiring therapists to use a standard format to document the shifts when they manually enter data to reduce manual data entry error rate. The therapist manual data entry errors in R&V system before (551 entries) and after the format standardization (1645 entries) are the subjects of statistical analysis. The errors are divided into two categories (recoverable and non‐recoverable errors) depending on whether a human being can recover the translation shifts in lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions from the therapist notes. Fisher's exact test is performed to test the statistical significance of therapist's data entry error reduction after our imposing the documentation format requirement. Temporal information on when the errors were made is also analyzed to find out when errors are more likely to happen. Results: Statistical analysis indicated that reductions in the numbers of recoverable, non‐recoverable, and total errors after standardization in document format are all statistically significant with p values less than 0.05. Conclusion: A simple and low cost measure like standardization in document format can significantly reduce the errors operators introduce to patient R&V system when they perform manual data entry. We hope our experience will convince people to follow more disciplined documentation rule to reduce the error rate and therefore potentially can improve the quality of patient care when manual data entry is involved.",
author = "Sumin Zhou and S. Chen and Wahl, {Andrew O} and Enke, {Charles Arthur}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.4735266",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐T‐206

T2 - Standardization in Documentation Format Can Significantly Reduce Manual Data Entry Error in Patient Chart

AU - Zhou, Sumin

AU - Chen, S.

AU - Wahl, Andrew O

AU - Enke, Charles Arthur

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To demonstrate that standardization in documentation format can significantly reduce manual data entry error in patient chart. Method and Materials: Due to lack of direct data link between CT on rail imaging registration software and patient R&V system, therapists have to manually enter translation correction of patient position into R&V system after performing imaging registration between CT image taken just before treatment delivery and treatment planning CT image. Approximately six months after CT on rail was placed into clinical service, we started requiring therapists to use a standard format to document the shifts when they manually enter data to reduce manual data entry error rate. The therapist manual data entry errors in R&V system before (551 entries) and after the format standardization (1645 entries) are the subjects of statistical analysis. The errors are divided into two categories (recoverable and non‐recoverable errors) depending on whether a human being can recover the translation shifts in lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions from the therapist notes. Fisher's exact test is performed to test the statistical significance of therapist's data entry error reduction after our imposing the documentation format requirement. Temporal information on when the errors were made is also analyzed to find out when errors are more likely to happen. Results: Statistical analysis indicated that reductions in the numbers of recoverable, non‐recoverable, and total errors after standardization in document format are all statistically significant with p values less than 0.05. Conclusion: A simple and low cost measure like standardization in document format can significantly reduce the errors operators introduce to patient R&V system when they perform manual data entry. We hope our experience will convince people to follow more disciplined documentation rule to reduce the error rate and therefore potentially can improve the quality of patient care when manual data entry is involved.

AB - Purpose: To demonstrate that standardization in documentation format can significantly reduce manual data entry error in patient chart. Method and Materials: Due to lack of direct data link between CT on rail imaging registration software and patient R&V system, therapists have to manually enter translation correction of patient position into R&V system after performing imaging registration between CT image taken just before treatment delivery and treatment planning CT image. Approximately six months after CT on rail was placed into clinical service, we started requiring therapists to use a standard format to document the shifts when they manually enter data to reduce manual data entry error rate. The therapist manual data entry errors in R&V system before (551 entries) and after the format standardization (1645 entries) are the subjects of statistical analysis. The errors are divided into two categories (recoverable and non‐recoverable errors) depending on whether a human being can recover the translation shifts in lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions from the therapist notes. Fisher's exact test is performed to test the statistical significance of therapist's data entry error reduction after our imposing the documentation format requirement. Temporal information on when the errors were made is also analyzed to find out when errors are more likely to happen. Results: Statistical analysis indicated that reductions in the numbers of recoverable, non‐recoverable, and total errors after standardization in document format are all statistically significant with p values less than 0.05. Conclusion: A simple and low cost measure like standardization in document format can significantly reduce the errors operators introduce to patient R&V system when they perform manual data entry. We hope our experience will convince people to follow more disciplined documentation rule to reduce the error rate and therefore potentially can improve the quality of patient care when manual data entry is involved.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024777784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024777784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4735266

DO - 10.1118/1.4735266

M3 - Article

VL - 39

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -