Students' Conceptions of Controversial Knowledge

John G. Nicholls, J. Ron Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Elementary school students were interviewed about the questions of the existence of intelligent life in space and of whether more money should be invested in space exploration than health care on earth. Students in grades 1 through 6 recognized the lack of social consensus on these topics and made subtle distinctions between them and noncontroversial topics. For example, they said that it would be legitimate for teachers to teach the positions students themselves endorsed on noncontroversial matters. Yet, students (in upper grades more so than lower grades) rejected the idea that teachers might teach the positions the students favored on the controversial matters. The results are consistent with suggestions that elementary school students might cope well with inquiry about controversial topics and that these students should be recognized as curriculum theorists and critics of schooling. The likely importance of conceptions of knowledge in students' motivation is suggested.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)224-230
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Educational Psychology
Volume84
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1992

Fingerprint

Students
student
elementary school
Space Flight
teacher
Curriculum
critic
money
school grade
health care
Delivery of Health Care
curriculum
lack

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Students' Conceptions of Controversial Knowledge. / Nicholls, John G.; Nelson, J. Ron.

In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 84, No. 2, 06.1992, p. 224-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9f9f1ad34f2a4f43a996373c669b47a5,
title = "Students' Conceptions of Controversial Knowledge",
abstract = "Elementary school students were interviewed about the questions of the existence of intelligent life in space and of whether more money should be invested in space exploration than health care on earth. Students in grades 1 through 6 recognized the lack of social consensus on these topics and made subtle distinctions between them and noncontroversial topics. For example, they said that it would be legitimate for teachers to teach the positions students themselves endorsed on noncontroversial matters. Yet, students (in upper grades more so than lower grades) rejected the idea that teachers might teach the positions the students favored on the controversial matters. The results are consistent with suggestions that elementary school students might cope well with inquiry about controversial topics and that these students should be recognized as curriculum theorists and critics of schooling. The likely importance of conceptions of knowledge in students' motivation is suggested.",
author = "Nicholls, {John G.} and Nelson, {J. Ron}",
year = "1992",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/0022-0663.84.2.224",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "224--230",
journal = "Journal of Educational Psychology",
issn = "0022-0663",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Students' Conceptions of Controversial Knowledge

AU - Nicholls, John G.

AU - Nelson, J. Ron

PY - 1992/6

Y1 - 1992/6

N2 - Elementary school students were interviewed about the questions of the existence of intelligent life in space and of whether more money should be invested in space exploration than health care on earth. Students in grades 1 through 6 recognized the lack of social consensus on these topics and made subtle distinctions between them and noncontroversial topics. For example, they said that it would be legitimate for teachers to teach the positions students themselves endorsed on noncontroversial matters. Yet, students (in upper grades more so than lower grades) rejected the idea that teachers might teach the positions the students favored on the controversial matters. The results are consistent with suggestions that elementary school students might cope well with inquiry about controversial topics and that these students should be recognized as curriculum theorists and critics of schooling. The likely importance of conceptions of knowledge in students' motivation is suggested.

AB - Elementary school students were interviewed about the questions of the existence of intelligent life in space and of whether more money should be invested in space exploration than health care on earth. Students in grades 1 through 6 recognized the lack of social consensus on these topics and made subtle distinctions between them and noncontroversial topics. For example, they said that it would be legitimate for teachers to teach the positions students themselves endorsed on noncontroversial matters. Yet, students (in upper grades more so than lower grades) rejected the idea that teachers might teach the positions the students favored on the controversial matters. The results are consistent with suggestions that elementary school students might cope well with inquiry about controversial topics and that these students should be recognized as curriculum theorists and critics of schooling. The likely importance of conceptions of knowledge in students' motivation is suggested.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0039591108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0039591108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-0663.84.2.224

DO - 10.1037/0022-0663.84.2.224

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0039591108

VL - 84

SP - 224

EP - 230

JO - Journal of Educational Psychology

JF - Journal of Educational Psychology

SN - 0022-0663

IS - 2

ER -