Student preferences for adaptations in classroom testing

Janet S. Nelson, Madhavi Jayanthi, Michael H. Epstein, William D. Bursuck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate student preferences for specific adaptations in general education classroom testing. Participants in the study were 158 middle school students, including students with high-incidence disabilities (HID) and general education students with low, average, high, and very high achievement. Students completed an instrument developed for the study, the Student Preferences for Testing Adaptations Questionnaire. Students rated each of 23 specific testing adaptations on a 4-point scale (1 = dislike to 4 = high preference). In two additional questions, students also stated reasons for a single most-liked and a single least-liked adaptation. Most testing adaptations were at least moderately preferred by students. Open-notes and open-book tests were among the adaptations most preferred, and least-preferred adaptations included teacher reading of test questions to students and tests with fewer questions or covering less material. Students with HID and/or students with low achievement indicated significantly higher preference than did students with average or above-average achievement for several adaptations. Students' rationales for their choices of most-liked adaptations included improved test performance as well as the opportunity to work with peers and to receive assistance. On the other hand, students' descriptions of least-liked adaptations included concerns regarding fairness and interference with their own style of working.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-52
Number of pages12
JournalRemedial and Special Education
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Students
classroom
student
general education
incidence
disability
Education
Incidence
fairness
Reading
interference
assistance
questionnaire
teacher

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Nelson, J. S., Jayanthi, M., Epstein, M. H., & Bursuck, W. D. (2000). Student preferences for adaptations in classroom testing. Remedial and Special Education, 21(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250002100106

Student preferences for adaptations in classroom testing. / Nelson, Janet S.; Jayanthi, Madhavi; Epstein, Michael H.; Bursuck, William D.

In: Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.01.2000, p. 41-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nelson, JS, Jayanthi, M, Epstein, MH & Bursuck, WD 2000, 'Student preferences for adaptations in classroom testing', Remedial and Special Education, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250002100106
Nelson, Janet S. ; Jayanthi, Madhavi ; Epstein, Michael H. ; Bursuck, William D. / Student preferences for adaptations in classroom testing. In: Remedial and Special Education. 2000 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 41-52.
@article{f741a5a308254e9ab315008d594a6e28,
title = "Student preferences for adaptations in classroom testing",
abstract = "The purpose of the present study was to investigate student preferences for specific adaptations in general education classroom testing. Participants in the study were 158 middle school students, including students with high-incidence disabilities (HID) and general education students with low, average, high, and very high achievement. Students completed an instrument developed for the study, the Student Preferences for Testing Adaptations Questionnaire. Students rated each of 23 specific testing adaptations on a 4-point scale (1 = dislike to 4 = high preference). In two additional questions, students also stated reasons for a single most-liked and a single least-liked adaptation. Most testing adaptations were at least moderately preferred by students. Open-notes and open-book tests were among the adaptations most preferred, and least-preferred adaptations included teacher reading of test questions to students and tests with fewer questions or covering less material. Students with HID and/or students with low achievement indicated significantly higher preference than did students with average or above-average achievement for several adaptations. Students' rationales for their choices of most-liked adaptations included improved test performance as well as the opportunity to work with peers and to receive assistance. On the other hand, students' descriptions of least-liked adaptations included concerns regarding fairness and interference with their own style of working.",
author = "Nelson, {Janet S.} and Madhavi Jayanthi and Epstein, {Michael H.} and Bursuck, {William D.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/074193250002100106",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "41--52",
journal = "Remedial and Special Education",
issn = "0741-9325",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Student preferences for adaptations in classroom testing

AU - Nelson, Janet S.

AU - Jayanthi, Madhavi

AU - Epstein, Michael H.

AU - Bursuck, William D.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - The purpose of the present study was to investigate student preferences for specific adaptations in general education classroom testing. Participants in the study were 158 middle school students, including students with high-incidence disabilities (HID) and general education students with low, average, high, and very high achievement. Students completed an instrument developed for the study, the Student Preferences for Testing Adaptations Questionnaire. Students rated each of 23 specific testing adaptations on a 4-point scale (1 = dislike to 4 = high preference). In two additional questions, students also stated reasons for a single most-liked and a single least-liked adaptation. Most testing adaptations were at least moderately preferred by students. Open-notes and open-book tests were among the adaptations most preferred, and least-preferred adaptations included teacher reading of test questions to students and tests with fewer questions or covering less material. Students with HID and/or students with low achievement indicated significantly higher preference than did students with average or above-average achievement for several adaptations. Students' rationales for their choices of most-liked adaptations included improved test performance as well as the opportunity to work with peers and to receive assistance. On the other hand, students' descriptions of least-liked adaptations included concerns regarding fairness and interference with their own style of working.

AB - The purpose of the present study was to investigate student preferences for specific adaptations in general education classroom testing. Participants in the study were 158 middle school students, including students with high-incidence disabilities (HID) and general education students with low, average, high, and very high achievement. Students completed an instrument developed for the study, the Student Preferences for Testing Adaptations Questionnaire. Students rated each of 23 specific testing adaptations on a 4-point scale (1 = dislike to 4 = high preference). In two additional questions, students also stated reasons for a single most-liked and a single least-liked adaptation. Most testing adaptations were at least moderately preferred by students. Open-notes and open-book tests were among the adaptations most preferred, and least-preferred adaptations included teacher reading of test questions to students and tests with fewer questions or covering less material. Students with HID and/or students with low achievement indicated significantly higher preference than did students with average or above-average achievement for several adaptations. Students' rationales for their choices of most-liked adaptations included improved test performance as well as the opportunity to work with peers and to receive assistance. On the other hand, students' descriptions of least-liked adaptations included concerns regarding fairness and interference with their own style of working.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034336289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034336289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/074193250002100106

DO - 10.1177/074193250002100106

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034336289

VL - 21

SP - 41

EP - 52

JO - Remedial and Special Education

JF - Remedial and Special Education

SN - 0741-9325

IS - 1

ER -