Structural properties of a novel design of composite analogue humeri models

James T. Dunlap, Alexander C.M. Chong, George L. Lucas, Francis W. Cooke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Mechanical analogue composite bone models have been used as cadaveric bone substitutes in a wide variety of biomechanical tests. The objective of this study was to compare the structural properties of two types (Third- and Fourth-Generation) of commercially available composite analogue humeri. Methods Eighteen of each generation composite analogue humeri were evaluated for flexural rigidity, torsional rigidity, and failure strength. Three tests were performed: medial-lateral four-point bending, anterior-posterior four-point bending, and external rotational torque. Results The Fourth-Generation analogue humeri performed more closely to the biological average with respect to failure strength, flexural rigidity, and torsional stiffness when compared to the Third-Generation humeri. Both the Third- and Fourth-Generation analogues were within the range of published human bone values. There was a statistically significant difference in strength in all modes of testing between the Fourth-Generation humeri and the Third-Generation humeri. Conclusion These composite analogue humeri are ideal for standardization in biomechanical analyses. The advantage of these humeri is that their variability is significantly lower than that of cadaveric specimens for all loading regimens. The widely varying results observed when comparing composite analogue humeri to cadaveric humeri might be derived from the use of different ranges of applied load, varied test methodologies, and diverse methods of computing the stiffness. Mechanical validation of whole Fourth-Generation humeri bone models would be an appropriate follow-up to this study with a direct comparison to cadaveric humeri. Clinical relevance This study validated and advanced our overall understanding of the capacity of composite analogue humeri to model the structural properties of human bone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1922-1926
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of biomedical engineering
Volume36
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2008

Fingerprint

Structural properties
Bone
Composite materials
Rigidity
Stiffness
Bending strength
Standardization
Torque
Testing

Keywords

  • Biomechanical model
  • Bone mechanics
  • Bone stiffness
  • Composite analogue humeri
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Structural properties of a novel design of composite analogue humeri models. / Dunlap, James T.; Chong, Alexander C.M.; Lucas, George L.; Cooke, Francis W.

In: Annals of biomedical engineering, Vol. 36, No. 11, 01.11.2008, p. 1922-1926.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dunlap, James T. ; Chong, Alexander C.M. ; Lucas, George L. ; Cooke, Francis W. / Structural properties of a novel design of composite analogue humeri models. In: Annals of biomedical engineering. 2008 ; Vol. 36, No. 11. pp. 1922-1926.
@article{9fbbe3d2a8db49ac9f0e6204920901fe,
title = "Structural properties of a novel design of composite analogue humeri models",
abstract = "Background Mechanical analogue composite bone models have been used as cadaveric bone substitutes in a wide variety of biomechanical tests. The objective of this study was to compare the structural properties of two types (Third- and Fourth-Generation) of commercially available composite analogue humeri. Methods Eighteen of each generation composite analogue humeri were evaluated for flexural rigidity, torsional rigidity, and failure strength. Three tests were performed: medial-lateral four-point bending, anterior-posterior four-point bending, and external rotational torque. Results The Fourth-Generation analogue humeri performed more closely to the biological average with respect to failure strength, flexural rigidity, and torsional stiffness when compared to the Third-Generation humeri. Both the Third- and Fourth-Generation analogues were within the range of published human bone values. There was a statistically significant difference in strength in all modes of testing between the Fourth-Generation humeri and the Third-Generation humeri. Conclusion These composite analogue humeri are ideal for standardization in biomechanical analyses. The advantage of these humeri is that their variability is significantly lower than that of cadaveric specimens for all loading regimens. The widely varying results observed when comparing composite analogue humeri to cadaveric humeri might be derived from the use of different ranges of applied load, varied test methodologies, and diverse methods of computing the stiffness. Mechanical validation of whole Fourth-Generation humeri bone models would be an appropriate follow-up to this study with a direct comparison to cadaveric humeri. Clinical relevance This study validated and advanced our overall understanding of the capacity of composite analogue humeri to model the structural properties of human bone.",
keywords = "Biomechanical model, Bone mechanics, Bone stiffness, Composite analogue humeri, Validation",
author = "Dunlap, {James T.} and Chong, {Alexander C.M.} and Lucas, {George L.} and Cooke, {Francis W.}",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10439-008-9568-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "1922--1926",
journal = "Annals of Biomedical Engineering",
issn = "0090-6964",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural properties of a novel design of composite analogue humeri models

AU - Dunlap, James T.

AU - Chong, Alexander C.M.

AU - Lucas, George L.

AU - Cooke, Francis W.

PY - 2008/11/1

Y1 - 2008/11/1

N2 - Background Mechanical analogue composite bone models have been used as cadaveric bone substitutes in a wide variety of biomechanical tests. The objective of this study was to compare the structural properties of two types (Third- and Fourth-Generation) of commercially available composite analogue humeri. Methods Eighteen of each generation composite analogue humeri were evaluated for flexural rigidity, torsional rigidity, and failure strength. Three tests were performed: medial-lateral four-point bending, anterior-posterior four-point bending, and external rotational torque. Results The Fourth-Generation analogue humeri performed more closely to the biological average with respect to failure strength, flexural rigidity, and torsional stiffness when compared to the Third-Generation humeri. Both the Third- and Fourth-Generation analogues were within the range of published human bone values. There was a statistically significant difference in strength in all modes of testing between the Fourth-Generation humeri and the Third-Generation humeri. Conclusion These composite analogue humeri are ideal for standardization in biomechanical analyses. The advantage of these humeri is that their variability is significantly lower than that of cadaveric specimens for all loading regimens. The widely varying results observed when comparing composite analogue humeri to cadaveric humeri might be derived from the use of different ranges of applied load, varied test methodologies, and diverse methods of computing the stiffness. Mechanical validation of whole Fourth-Generation humeri bone models would be an appropriate follow-up to this study with a direct comparison to cadaveric humeri. Clinical relevance This study validated and advanced our overall understanding of the capacity of composite analogue humeri to model the structural properties of human bone.

AB - Background Mechanical analogue composite bone models have been used as cadaveric bone substitutes in a wide variety of biomechanical tests. The objective of this study was to compare the structural properties of two types (Third- and Fourth-Generation) of commercially available composite analogue humeri. Methods Eighteen of each generation composite analogue humeri were evaluated for flexural rigidity, torsional rigidity, and failure strength. Three tests were performed: medial-lateral four-point bending, anterior-posterior four-point bending, and external rotational torque. Results The Fourth-Generation analogue humeri performed more closely to the biological average with respect to failure strength, flexural rigidity, and torsional stiffness when compared to the Third-Generation humeri. Both the Third- and Fourth-Generation analogues were within the range of published human bone values. There was a statistically significant difference in strength in all modes of testing between the Fourth-Generation humeri and the Third-Generation humeri. Conclusion These composite analogue humeri are ideal for standardization in biomechanical analyses. The advantage of these humeri is that their variability is significantly lower than that of cadaveric specimens for all loading regimens. The widely varying results observed when comparing composite analogue humeri to cadaveric humeri might be derived from the use of different ranges of applied load, varied test methodologies, and diverse methods of computing the stiffness. Mechanical validation of whole Fourth-Generation humeri bone models would be an appropriate follow-up to this study with a direct comparison to cadaveric humeri. Clinical relevance This study validated and advanced our overall understanding of the capacity of composite analogue humeri to model the structural properties of human bone.

KW - Biomechanical model

KW - Bone mechanics

KW - Bone stiffness

KW - Composite analogue humeri

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54849433115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54849433115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10439-008-9568-y

DO - 10.1007/s10439-008-9568-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 18797993

AN - SCOPUS:54849433115

VL - 36

SP - 1922

EP - 1926

JO - Annals of Biomedical Engineering

JF - Annals of Biomedical Engineering

SN - 0090-6964

IS - 11

ER -