Stimulus parameters governing confusion effects in forward masking

Donna L. Neff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In forward masking, performance may be affected by confusion, that is, by the difficulty of discriminating a suprathreshold signal from the preceding masker. This study investigated confusion effects for forward maskers composed of repeated bursts of a 1000-Hz sinusoid followed by sinusoidal signals; such “pulsing” maskers produce confusion when the properties of the signal are identical to those of an individual masker “pulse.” The level, frequency, and duration of the signal relative to an individual masker pulse, as well as offset-onset delay, were varied to determine the minimum change necessary to eliminate confusion. For maskers composed of 20-ms pulses, confusion was eliminated by changes in signal level of 5 dB or changes in signal frequency of 30 to 40 Hz. For maskers composed of 10-, 20-, or 40-ms pulses, confusion was eliminated by signal delays of 8 to 16 ms or by signal durations less than half or greater than twice the masker-pulse duration. Results with adaptive procedures designed to measure confusion-free or confusion-determined thresholds suggest that confusion effects can be minimized or avoided by extensive listener training with a procedure in which the signal and masker are not presented at similar intensities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1966-1976
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume78
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1985

Fingerprint

confusion
masking
stimuli
pulses
Stimulus
Confusion
Masking
sine waves
bursts
pulse duration
education
Pulse
thresholds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Stimulus parameters governing confusion effects in forward masking. / Neff, Donna L.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 78, No. 6, 12.1985, p. 1966-1976.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bce9fe88ac1d441f807d9b981ab39941,
title = "Stimulus parameters governing confusion effects in forward masking",
abstract = "In forward masking, performance may be affected by confusion, that is, by the difficulty of discriminating a suprathreshold signal from the preceding masker. This study investigated confusion effects for forward maskers composed of repeated bursts of a 1000-Hz sinusoid followed by sinusoidal signals; such “pulsing” maskers produce confusion when the properties of the signal are identical to those of an individual masker “pulse.” The level, frequency, and duration of the signal relative to an individual masker pulse, as well as offset-onset delay, were varied to determine the minimum change necessary to eliminate confusion. For maskers composed of 20-ms pulses, confusion was eliminated by changes in signal level of 5 dB or changes in signal frequency of 30 to 40 Hz. For maskers composed of 10-, 20-, or 40-ms pulses, confusion was eliminated by signal delays of 8 to 16 ms or by signal durations less than half or greater than twice the masker-pulse duration. Results with adaptive procedures designed to measure confusion-free or confusion-determined thresholds suggest that confusion effects can be minimized or avoided by extensive listener training with a procedure in which the signal and masker are not presented at similar intensities.",
author = "Neff, {Donna L.}",
year = "1985",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1121/1.392653",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "1966--1976",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stimulus parameters governing confusion effects in forward masking

AU - Neff, Donna L.

PY - 1985/12

Y1 - 1985/12

N2 - In forward masking, performance may be affected by confusion, that is, by the difficulty of discriminating a suprathreshold signal from the preceding masker. This study investigated confusion effects for forward maskers composed of repeated bursts of a 1000-Hz sinusoid followed by sinusoidal signals; such “pulsing” maskers produce confusion when the properties of the signal are identical to those of an individual masker “pulse.” The level, frequency, and duration of the signal relative to an individual masker pulse, as well as offset-onset delay, were varied to determine the minimum change necessary to eliminate confusion. For maskers composed of 20-ms pulses, confusion was eliminated by changes in signal level of 5 dB or changes in signal frequency of 30 to 40 Hz. For maskers composed of 10-, 20-, or 40-ms pulses, confusion was eliminated by signal delays of 8 to 16 ms or by signal durations less than half or greater than twice the masker-pulse duration. Results with adaptive procedures designed to measure confusion-free or confusion-determined thresholds suggest that confusion effects can be minimized or avoided by extensive listener training with a procedure in which the signal and masker are not presented at similar intensities.

AB - In forward masking, performance may be affected by confusion, that is, by the difficulty of discriminating a suprathreshold signal from the preceding masker. This study investigated confusion effects for forward maskers composed of repeated bursts of a 1000-Hz sinusoid followed by sinusoidal signals; such “pulsing” maskers produce confusion when the properties of the signal are identical to those of an individual masker “pulse.” The level, frequency, and duration of the signal relative to an individual masker pulse, as well as offset-onset delay, were varied to determine the minimum change necessary to eliminate confusion. For maskers composed of 20-ms pulses, confusion was eliminated by changes in signal level of 5 dB or changes in signal frequency of 30 to 40 Hz. For maskers composed of 10-, 20-, or 40-ms pulses, confusion was eliminated by signal delays of 8 to 16 ms or by signal durations less than half or greater than twice the masker-pulse duration. Results with adaptive procedures designed to measure confusion-free or confusion-determined thresholds suggest that confusion effects can be minimized or avoided by extensive listener training with a procedure in which the signal and masker are not presented at similar intensities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022401102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022401102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.392653

DO - 10.1121/1.392653

M3 - Article

C2 - 4078173

AN - SCOPUS:0022401102

VL - 78

SP - 1966

EP - 1976

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 6

ER -