States of mind model and cognitive change in treated social phobics

Monroe A. Bruch, Richard G. Heimberg, Debra A. Hope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The applicability of Schwartz and Garamoni's (1986, 1989) States of Mind (SOM) model for assessing the influence of cognitive-behavioral therapy on cognitive functioning was evaluated with social phobics. The SOM model states that a positive dialogue (i.e., a 2:1 ratio of positive to negative thoughts) is optimal for effective coping. Social phobics receiving either a cognitive-behavioral or educational-supportive group treatment were compared for SOM change, as were subjects meeting criteria for improvement or nonimprovement. Also the study compared the predictability of the SOM ratio with a ratio based on percent of negative thoughts. Subjects in both treatments evidenced negative monologue (i.e., a preponderance of negative thoughts) at pretreatment. A significant Treatment ×Time interaction showed that, although the groups did not differ at posttreatment, those in the cognitive treatment reached positive dialogue at a 6-month followup while the other group did not. Improvers also attained positive dialogue at followup while nonimprovers did not. The SOM and the negative thought ratios performed similarly in predicting most outcome measures, suggesting that neutral thoughts (the only distinction between the two) serve little function for persons with problems of social phobia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)429-441
Number of pages13
JournalCognitive Therapy and Research
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1991

Fingerprint

Cognitive Therapy
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Social Phobia

Keywords

  • cognitive assessment
  • cognitive treatment
  • social phobia
  • states of mind
  • thought-listing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

States of mind model and cognitive change in treated social phobics. / Bruch, Monroe A.; Heimberg, Richard G.; Hope, Debra A.

In: Cognitive Therapy and Research, Vol. 15, No. 6, 01.12.1991, p. 429-441.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bruch, Monroe A. ; Heimberg, Richard G. ; Hope, Debra A. / States of mind model and cognitive change in treated social phobics. In: Cognitive Therapy and Research. 1991 ; Vol. 15, No. 6. pp. 429-441.
@article{a32708a538e24bc195d8081cceaca507,
title = "States of mind model and cognitive change in treated social phobics",
abstract = "The applicability of Schwartz and Garamoni's (1986, 1989) States of Mind (SOM) model for assessing the influence of cognitive-behavioral therapy on cognitive functioning was evaluated with social phobics. The SOM model states that a positive dialogue (i.e., a 2:1 ratio of positive to negative thoughts) is optimal for effective coping. Social phobics receiving either a cognitive-behavioral or educational-supportive group treatment were compared for SOM change, as were subjects meeting criteria for improvement or nonimprovement. Also the study compared the predictability of the SOM ratio with a ratio based on percent of negative thoughts. Subjects in both treatments evidenced negative monologue (i.e., a preponderance of negative thoughts) at pretreatment. A significant Treatment ×Time interaction showed that, although the groups did not differ at posttreatment, those in the cognitive treatment reached positive dialogue at a 6-month followup while the other group did not. Improvers also attained positive dialogue at followup while nonimprovers did not. The SOM and the negative thought ratios performed similarly in predicting most outcome measures, suggesting that neutral thoughts (the only distinction between the two) serve little function for persons with problems of social phobia.",
keywords = "cognitive assessment, cognitive treatment, social phobia, states of mind, thought-listing",
author = "Bruch, {Monroe A.} and Heimberg, {Richard G.} and Hope, {Debra A.}",
year = "1991",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF01175727",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "429--441",
journal = "Cognitive Therapy and Research",
issn = "0147-5916",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - States of mind model and cognitive change in treated social phobics

AU - Bruch, Monroe A.

AU - Heimberg, Richard G.

AU - Hope, Debra A.

PY - 1991/12/1

Y1 - 1991/12/1

N2 - The applicability of Schwartz and Garamoni's (1986, 1989) States of Mind (SOM) model for assessing the influence of cognitive-behavioral therapy on cognitive functioning was evaluated with social phobics. The SOM model states that a positive dialogue (i.e., a 2:1 ratio of positive to negative thoughts) is optimal for effective coping. Social phobics receiving either a cognitive-behavioral or educational-supportive group treatment were compared for SOM change, as were subjects meeting criteria for improvement or nonimprovement. Also the study compared the predictability of the SOM ratio with a ratio based on percent of negative thoughts. Subjects in both treatments evidenced negative monologue (i.e., a preponderance of negative thoughts) at pretreatment. A significant Treatment ×Time interaction showed that, although the groups did not differ at posttreatment, those in the cognitive treatment reached positive dialogue at a 6-month followup while the other group did not. Improvers also attained positive dialogue at followup while nonimprovers did not. The SOM and the negative thought ratios performed similarly in predicting most outcome measures, suggesting that neutral thoughts (the only distinction between the two) serve little function for persons with problems of social phobia.

AB - The applicability of Schwartz and Garamoni's (1986, 1989) States of Mind (SOM) model for assessing the influence of cognitive-behavioral therapy on cognitive functioning was evaluated with social phobics. The SOM model states that a positive dialogue (i.e., a 2:1 ratio of positive to negative thoughts) is optimal for effective coping. Social phobics receiving either a cognitive-behavioral or educational-supportive group treatment were compared for SOM change, as were subjects meeting criteria for improvement or nonimprovement. Also the study compared the predictability of the SOM ratio with a ratio based on percent of negative thoughts. Subjects in both treatments evidenced negative monologue (i.e., a preponderance of negative thoughts) at pretreatment. A significant Treatment ×Time interaction showed that, although the groups did not differ at posttreatment, those in the cognitive treatment reached positive dialogue at a 6-month followup while the other group did not. Improvers also attained positive dialogue at followup while nonimprovers did not. The SOM and the negative thought ratios performed similarly in predicting most outcome measures, suggesting that neutral thoughts (the only distinction between the two) serve little function for persons with problems of social phobia.

KW - cognitive assessment

KW - cognitive treatment

KW - social phobia

KW - states of mind

KW - thought-listing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001182691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001182691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01175727

DO - 10.1007/BF01175727

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001182691

VL - 15

SP - 429

EP - 441

JO - Cognitive Therapy and Research

JF - Cognitive Therapy and Research

SN - 0147-5916

IS - 6

ER -