Staphylococcus aureus primase has higher initiation specificity, interacts with single-stranded DNA stronger, but is less stimulated by its helicase than Escherichia coli primase

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study of primases from model organisms such as Escherichia coli, phage T7 and phage T4 has demonstrated the essential nature of primase function, which is to generate de novo RNA polymers to prime DNA polymerase. However, little is known about the function of primases from other eubacteria. Their overall low primary sequence homology may result in functional differences. To help understand which primase functions were conserved, primase and its replication partner helicase from the pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus were compared in detail with that of E. coli primase and helicase. The conserved properties were to primer initiation and elongation and included slow kinetics, low fidelity and poor sugar specificity. The significant differences included S. aureus primase having sixfold higher kinetic affinity for its template than E. coli primase under equivalent conditions. This naturally higher activity was balanced by its fourfold lower stimulation by its replication fork helicase compared with E. coli primase. The most significant difference between the two primases was that S. aureus helicase stimulation did not broaden the S. aureus primase initiation specificity, which has important biological implications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1570-1582
Number of pages13
JournalMolecular Microbiology
Volume68
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008

Fingerprint

DNA Primase
Single-Stranded DNA
Staphylococcus aureus
Escherichia coli
Bacteriophage T7
Coliphages
Bacteriophage T4
Gram-Positive Bacteria
DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase
Sequence Homology
Polymers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology
  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

@article{1f38f7c59a9f4595bc6cc0ba5a61a711,
title = "Staphylococcus aureus primase has higher initiation specificity, interacts with single-stranded DNA stronger, but is less stimulated by its helicase than Escherichia coli primase",
abstract = "The study of primases from model organisms such as Escherichia coli, phage T7 and phage T4 has demonstrated the essential nature of primase function, which is to generate de novo RNA polymers to prime DNA polymerase. However, little is known about the function of primases from other eubacteria. Their overall low primary sequence homology may result in functional differences. To help understand which primase functions were conserved, primase and its replication partner helicase from the pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus were compared in detail with that of E. coli primase and helicase. The conserved properties were to primer initiation and elongation and included slow kinetics, low fidelity and poor sugar specificity. The significant differences included S. aureus primase having sixfold higher kinetic affinity for its template than E. coli primase under equivalent conditions. This naturally higher activity was balanced by its fourfold lower stimulation by its replication fork helicase compared with E. coli primase. The most significant difference between the two primases was that S. aureus helicase stimulation did not broaden the S. aureus primase initiation specificity, which has important biological implications.",
author = "Koepsell, {Scott A} and Larson, {Marilynn A} and Frey, {Christopher A.} and Hinrichs, {Steven Heye} and Griep, {Mark A}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06255.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "1570--1582",
journal = "Molecular Microbiology",
issn = "0950-382X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Staphylococcus aureus primase has higher initiation specificity, interacts with single-stranded DNA stronger, but is less stimulated by its helicase than Escherichia coli primase

AU - Koepsell, Scott A

AU - Larson, Marilynn A

AU - Frey, Christopher A.

AU - Hinrichs, Steven Heye

AU - Griep, Mark A

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - The study of primases from model organisms such as Escherichia coli, phage T7 and phage T4 has demonstrated the essential nature of primase function, which is to generate de novo RNA polymers to prime DNA polymerase. However, little is known about the function of primases from other eubacteria. Their overall low primary sequence homology may result in functional differences. To help understand which primase functions were conserved, primase and its replication partner helicase from the pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus were compared in detail with that of E. coli primase and helicase. The conserved properties were to primer initiation and elongation and included slow kinetics, low fidelity and poor sugar specificity. The significant differences included S. aureus primase having sixfold higher kinetic affinity for its template than E. coli primase under equivalent conditions. This naturally higher activity was balanced by its fourfold lower stimulation by its replication fork helicase compared with E. coli primase. The most significant difference between the two primases was that S. aureus helicase stimulation did not broaden the S. aureus primase initiation specificity, which has important biological implications.

AB - The study of primases from model organisms such as Escherichia coli, phage T7 and phage T4 has demonstrated the essential nature of primase function, which is to generate de novo RNA polymers to prime DNA polymerase. However, little is known about the function of primases from other eubacteria. Their overall low primary sequence homology may result in functional differences. To help understand which primase functions were conserved, primase and its replication partner helicase from the pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus were compared in detail with that of E. coli primase and helicase. The conserved properties were to primer initiation and elongation and included slow kinetics, low fidelity and poor sugar specificity. The significant differences included S. aureus primase having sixfold higher kinetic affinity for its template than E. coli primase under equivalent conditions. This naturally higher activity was balanced by its fourfold lower stimulation by its replication fork helicase compared with E. coli primase. The most significant difference between the two primases was that S. aureus helicase stimulation did not broaden the S. aureus primase initiation specificity, which has important biological implications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44249097571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44249097571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06255.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06255.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18452509

AN - SCOPUS:44249097571

VL - 68

SP - 1570

EP - 1582

JO - Molecular Microbiology

JF - Molecular Microbiology

SN - 0950-382X

IS - 6

ER -