Standardizing measurement of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations

Reliability and validity of a patient-reported diary

Nancy Kline Leidy, Teresa K. Wilcox, Paul W. Jones, Paul Jones, Laurie Roberts, John H. Powers, Sanjay Sethi, James Donohue, Sonya Eremenco, Penny Erickson, Fernando Martinez, Donald Patrick, Stephen Israel Rennard, Roberto Rodriguez-Roisin, Holger Schünemann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

113 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale: Although exacerbations are an important problem in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a target of intervention, there is no valid, standardized tool for assessing their frequency, severity, and duration. Objectives: This study tested the properties of the Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT), a new patient-reported outcome diary. Methods: A prospective, two-group, observational study was conducted in patients with COPD. The acute group (n = 222) was enrolled during a clinic visit for exacerbation with follow-up visits on Days 10, 29, and 60. The stable group (n = 188), recruited by telephone or during routine visits, was exacerbation free for at least 60 days. Measurements and Main Results: Acute patients completed the diary on Days 1-29 and 60-67; stable patients for 7 days. All patients provided stable-state spirometry and completed the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire-COPD (SGRQ-C). Acute patient assessments included clinician and patient global ratings of exacerbation severity and recovery. Mean age of the sample (n = 410) was 65 (± 10) years; 48% were male; stable FEV1 was 51% predicted (± 20). Internal consistency (Pearson separation index) for the EXACT was 0.92, 1-week reproducibility (stable patients; intraclass correlation) was 0.77. EXACT scores correlated with SGRQ-C (r = 0.64; P < 0.0001) and differentiated acute and stable patients (P<0.0001). In acute patients, scores improved over time (P < 0.0001) and differentiated between degrees of clinician-rated exacerbation severity (P < 0.05). EXACT change scores differentiated responders and nonresponders on Day 10, as judged by clinicians or patients (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Results suggest the EXACT is reliable, valid, and sensitive to change with exacerbation recovery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-329
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Volume183
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2011

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Disease Progression
Lung Diseases
Chronic Disease
Spirometry
Ambulatory Care
Telephone
Observational Studies

Keywords

  • COPD
  • Diary
  • Exacerbation
  • Patient-reported outcomes
  • Symptoms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Standardizing measurement of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations : Reliability and validity of a patient-reported diary. / Leidy, Nancy Kline; Wilcox, Teresa K.; Jones, Paul W.; Jones, Paul; Roberts, Laurie; Powers, John H.; Sethi, Sanjay; Donohue, James; Eremenco, Sonya; Erickson, Penny; Martinez, Fernando; Patrick, Donald; Rennard, Stephen Israel; Rodriguez-Roisin, Roberto; Schünemann, Holger.

In: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 183, No. 3, 01.02.2011, p. 323-329.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leidy, NK, Wilcox, TK, Jones, PW, Jones, P, Roberts, L, Powers, JH, Sethi, S, Donohue, J, Eremenco, S, Erickson, P, Martinez, F, Patrick, D, Rennard, SI, Rodriguez-Roisin, R & Schünemann, H 2011, 'Standardizing measurement of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: Reliability and validity of a patient-reported diary', American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 183, no. 3, pp. 323-329. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201005-0762OC
Leidy, Nancy Kline ; Wilcox, Teresa K. ; Jones, Paul W. ; Jones, Paul ; Roberts, Laurie ; Powers, John H. ; Sethi, Sanjay ; Donohue, James ; Eremenco, Sonya ; Erickson, Penny ; Martinez, Fernando ; Patrick, Donald ; Rennard, Stephen Israel ; Rodriguez-Roisin, Roberto ; Schünemann, Holger. / Standardizing measurement of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations : Reliability and validity of a patient-reported diary. In: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 183, No. 3. pp. 323-329.
@article{aee334e512fe4c8386249a5cb47a5a43,
title = "Standardizing measurement of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: Reliability and validity of a patient-reported diary",
abstract = "Rationale: Although exacerbations are an important problem in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a target of intervention, there is no valid, standardized tool for assessing their frequency, severity, and duration. Objectives: This study tested the properties of the Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT), a new patient-reported outcome diary. Methods: A prospective, two-group, observational study was conducted in patients with COPD. The acute group (n = 222) was enrolled during a clinic visit for exacerbation with follow-up visits on Days 10, 29, and 60. The stable group (n = 188), recruited by telephone or during routine visits, was exacerbation free for at least 60 days. Measurements and Main Results: Acute patients completed the diary on Days 1-29 and 60-67; stable patients for 7 days. All patients provided stable-state spirometry and completed the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire-COPD (SGRQ-C). Acute patient assessments included clinician and patient global ratings of exacerbation severity and recovery. Mean age of the sample (n = 410) was 65 (± 10) years; 48{\%} were male; stable FEV1 was 51{\%} predicted (± 20). Internal consistency (Pearson separation index) for the EXACT was 0.92, 1-week reproducibility (stable patients; intraclass correlation) was 0.77. EXACT scores correlated with SGRQ-C (r = 0.64; P < 0.0001) and differentiated acute and stable patients (P<0.0001). In acute patients, scores improved over time (P < 0.0001) and differentiated between degrees of clinician-rated exacerbation severity (P < 0.05). EXACT change scores differentiated responders and nonresponders on Day 10, as judged by clinicians or patients (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Results suggest the EXACT is reliable, valid, and sensitive to change with exacerbation recovery.",
keywords = "COPD, Diary, Exacerbation, Patient-reported outcomes, Symptoms",
author = "Leidy, {Nancy Kline} and Wilcox, {Teresa K.} and Jones, {Paul W.} and Paul Jones and Laurie Roberts and Powers, {John H.} and Sanjay Sethi and James Donohue and Sonya Eremenco and Penny Erickson and Fernando Martinez and Donald Patrick and Rennard, {Stephen Israel} and Roberto Rodriguez-Roisin and Holger Sch{\"u}nemann",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1164/rccm.201005-0762OC",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "183",
pages = "323--329",
journal = "American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1073-449X",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standardizing measurement of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations

T2 - Reliability and validity of a patient-reported diary

AU - Leidy, Nancy Kline

AU - Wilcox, Teresa K.

AU - Jones, Paul W.

AU - Jones, Paul

AU - Roberts, Laurie

AU - Powers, John H.

AU - Sethi, Sanjay

AU - Donohue, James

AU - Eremenco, Sonya

AU - Erickson, Penny

AU - Martinez, Fernando

AU - Patrick, Donald

AU - Rennard, Stephen Israel

AU - Rodriguez-Roisin, Roberto

AU - Schünemann, Holger

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - Rationale: Although exacerbations are an important problem in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a target of intervention, there is no valid, standardized tool for assessing their frequency, severity, and duration. Objectives: This study tested the properties of the Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT), a new patient-reported outcome diary. Methods: A prospective, two-group, observational study was conducted in patients with COPD. The acute group (n = 222) was enrolled during a clinic visit for exacerbation with follow-up visits on Days 10, 29, and 60. The stable group (n = 188), recruited by telephone or during routine visits, was exacerbation free for at least 60 days. Measurements and Main Results: Acute patients completed the diary on Days 1-29 and 60-67; stable patients for 7 days. All patients provided stable-state spirometry and completed the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire-COPD (SGRQ-C). Acute patient assessments included clinician and patient global ratings of exacerbation severity and recovery. Mean age of the sample (n = 410) was 65 (± 10) years; 48% were male; stable FEV1 was 51% predicted (± 20). Internal consistency (Pearson separation index) for the EXACT was 0.92, 1-week reproducibility (stable patients; intraclass correlation) was 0.77. EXACT scores correlated with SGRQ-C (r = 0.64; P < 0.0001) and differentiated acute and stable patients (P<0.0001). In acute patients, scores improved over time (P < 0.0001) and differentiated between degrees of clinician-rated exacerbation severity (P < 0.05). EXACT change scores differentiated responders and nonresponders on Day 10, as judged by clinicians or patients (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Results suggest the EXACT is reliable, valid, and sensitive to change with exacerbation recovery.

AB - Rationale: Although exacerbations are an important problem in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a target of intervention, there is no valid, standardized tool for assessing their frequency, severity, and duration. Objectives: This study tested the properties of the Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT), a new patient-reported outcome diary. Methods: A prospective, two-group, observational study was conducted in patients with COPD. The acute group (n = 222) was enrolled during a clinic visit for exacerbation with follow-up visits on Days 10, 29, and 60. The stable group (n = 188), recruited by telephone or during routine visits, was exacerbation free for at least 60 days. Measurements and Main Results: Acute patients completed the diary on Days 1-29 and 60-67; stable patients for 7 days. All patients provided stable-state spirometry and completed the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire-COPD (SGRQ-C). Acute patient assessments included clinician and patient global ratings of exacerbation severity and recovery. Mean age of the sample (n = 410) was 65 (± 10) years; 48% were male; stable FEV1 was 51% predicted (± 20). Internal consistency (Pearson separation index) for the EXACT was 0.92, 1-week reproducibility (stable patients; intraclass correlation) was 0.77. EXACT scores correlated with SGRQ-C (r = 0.64; P < 0.0001) and differentiated acute and stable patients (P<0.0001). In acute patients, scores improved over time (P < 0.0001) and differentiated between degrees of clinician-rated exacerbation severity (P < 0.05). EXACT change scores differentiated responders and nonresponders on Day 10, as judged by clinicians or patients (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Results suggest the EXACT is reliable, valid, and sensitive to change with exacerbation recovery.

KW - COPD

KW - Diary

KW - Exacerbation

KW - Patient-reported outcomes

KW - Symptoms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79551538617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79551538617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1164/rccm.201005-0762OC

DO - 10.1164/rccm.201005-0762OC

M3 - Article

VL - 183

SP - 323

EP - 329

JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1073-449X

IS - 3

ER -