Spelling errors in adults with a form of familial dyslexia.

B. F. Pennington, L. L. McCabe, S. D. Smith, D. L. Lefly, M. O. Bookman, W. J. Kimberling, H. A. Lubs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared the spelling errors on the WRAT II made by adults (N = 24) with an apparent autosomal dominant form of dyslexia to those made by their normal adult relatives (N = 17) and by spelling-age matched normal controls (N = 17) using a computerized error evaluation program (SEEP). The normal adult relatives were significantly better than the dyslexics in both reading and spelling, but did not differ in age, education, or IQ. SEEP evaluated each error independently for both phonological and orthographic accuracy at 2 levels of complexity. Each level of complexity was analyzed separately using a 3 X 2 (group X dimension) analysis of variance. The main finding of interest was a significant group X dimension interaction effect at the complex level, which indicated that the dyslexics had a qualitatively different profile across the 2 dimensions than either normal group who had parallel profiles. The dyslexics performed like the younger normal group on the complex phonological dimension but like the adult normal group on the complex orthographic dimension. These results indicate a dissociation in this form of familial dyslexia between these 2 dimensions of spelling development, and suggest that these dyslexics may fit the subtype of dysphonetic or phonological dyslexia. The implications of these results for the underlying cognitive deficit in this form of dyslexia are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1001-1013
Number of pages13
JournalChild development
Volume57
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1986

Fingerprint

Dyslexia
dyslexia
Group
Program Evaluation
Reading
Analysis of Variance
analysis of variance
Education
deficit
interaction
evaluation
education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Pennington, B. F., McCabe, L. L., Smith, S. D., Lefly, D. L., Bookman, M. O., Kimberling, W. J., & Lubs, H. A. (1986). Spelling errors in adults with a form of familial dyslexia. Child development, 57(4), 1001-1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00261.x

Spelling errors in adults with a form of familial dyslexia. / Pennington, B. F.; McCabe, L. L.; Smith, S. D.; Lefly, D. L.; Bookman, M. O.; Kimberling, W. J.; Lubs, H. A.

In: Child development, Vol. 57, No. 4, 08.1986, p. 1001-1013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pennington, BF, McCabe, LL, Smith, SD, Lefly, DL, Bookman, MO, Kimberling, WJ & Lubs, HA 1986, 'Spelling errors in adults with a form of familial dyslexia.', Child development, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1001-1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00261.x
Pennington BF, McCabe LL, Smith SD, Lefly DL, Bookman MO, Kimberling WJ et al. Spelling errors in adults with a form of familial dyslexia. Child development. 1986 Aug;57(4):1001-1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00261.x
Pennington, B. F. ; McCabe, L. L. ; Smith, S. D. ; Lefly, D. L. ; Bookman, M. O. ; Kimberling, W. J. ; Lubs, H. A. / Spelling errors in adults with a form of familial dyslexia. In: Child development. 1986 ; Vol. 57, No. 4. pp. 1001-1013.
@article{a2e8e534001d432599a1f9449d1662b8,
title = "Spelling errors in adults with a form of familial dyslexia.",
abstract = "We compared the spelling errors on the WRAT II made by adults (N = 24) with an apparent autosomal dominant form of dyslexia to those made by their normal adult relatives (N = 17) and by spelling-age matched normal controls (N = 17) using a computerized error evaluation program (SEEP). The normal adult relatives were significantly better than the dyslexics in both reading and spelling, but did not differ in age, education, or IQ. SEEP evaluated each error independently for both phonological and orthographic accuracy at 2 levels of complexity. Each level of complexity was analyzed separately using a 3 X 2 (group X dimension) analysis of variance. The main finding of interest was a significant group X dimension interaction effect at the complex level, which indicated that the dyslexics had a qualitatively different profile across the 2 dimensions than either normal group who had parallel profiles. The dyslexics performed like the younger normal group on the complex phonological dimension but like the adult normal group on the complex orthographic dimension. These results indicate a dissociation in this form of familial dyslexia between these 2 dimensions of spelling development, and suggest that these dyslexics may fit the subtype of dysphonetic or phonological dyslexia. The implications of these results for the underlying cognitive deficit in this form of dyslexia are discussed.",
author = "Pennington, {B. F.} and McCabe, {L. L.} and Smith, {S. D.} and Lefly, {D. L.} and Bookman, {M. O.} and Kimberling, {W. J.} and Lubs, {H. A.}",
year = "1986",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00261.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "1001--1013",
journal = "Child Development",
issn = "0009-3920",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spelling errors in adults with a form of familial dyslexia.

AU - Pennington, B. F.

AU - McCabe, L. L.

AU - Smith, S. D.

AU - Lefly, D. L.

AU - Bookman, M. O.

AU - Kimberling, W. J.

AU - Lubs, H. A.

PY - 1986/8

Y1 - 1986/8

N2 - We compared the spelling errors on the WRAT II made by adults (N = 24) with an apparent autosomal dominant form of dyslexia to those made by their normal adult relatives (N = 17) and by spelling-age matched normal controls (N = 17) using a computerized error evaluation program (SEEP). The normal adult relatives were significantly better than the dyslexics in both reading and spelling, but did not differ in age, education, or IQ. SEEP evaluated each error independently for both phonological and orthographic accuracy at 2 levels of complexity. Each level of complexity was analyzed separately using a 3 X 2 (group X dimension) analysis of variance. The main finding of interest was a significant group X dimension interaction effect at the complex level, which indicated that the dyslexics had a qualitatively different profile across the 2 dimensions than either normal group who had parallel profiles. The dyslexics performed like the younger normal group on the complex phonological dimension but like the adult normal group on the complex orthographic dimension. These results indicate a dissociation in this form of familial dyslexia between these 2 dimensions of spelling development, and suggest that these dyslexics may fit the subtype of dysphonetic or phonological dyslexia. The implications of these results for the underlying cognitive deficit in this form of dyslexia are discussed.

AB - We compared the spelling errors on the WRAT II made by adults (N = 24) with an apparent autosomal dominant form of dyslexia to those made by their normal adult relatives (N = 17) and by spelling-age matched normal controls (N = 17) using a computerized error evaluation program (SEEP). The normal adult relatives were significantly better than the dyslexics in both reading and spelling, but did not differ in age, education, or IQ. SEEP evaluated each error independently for both phonological and orthographic accuracy at 2 levels of complexity. Each level of complexity was analyzed separately using a 3 X 2 (group X dimension) analysis of variance. The main finding of interest was a significant group X dimension interaction effect at the complex level, which indicated that the dyslexics had a qualitatively different profile across the 2 dimensions than either normal group who had parallel profiles. The dyslexics performed like the younger normal group on the complex phonological dimension but like the adult normal group on the complex orthographic dimension. These results indicate a dissociation in this form of familial dyslexia between these 2 dimensions of spelling development, and suggest that these dyslexics may fit the subtype of dysphonetic or phonological dyslexia. The implications of these results for the underlying cognitive deficit in this form of dyslexia are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022759518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022759518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00261.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00261.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 3757596

AN - SCOPUS:0022759518

VL - 57

SP - 1001

EP - 1013

JO - Child Development

JF - Child Development

SN - 0009-3920

IS - 4

ER -