Specialization in the Yellow Pages

Philip W. Smith, Arthur T. Keefe, Donald G. Langsley, Steven M. Denenberg, Howard W. Smith, Richard E. Rohr, Julia M. Reade, Richard M. Ratzan

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Abstract

To the Editor: The article on yellow professionalism in the May 21 issue* is compatible with the intuitive feeling of many physicians that there is an inverse (or at best, a random) relation between quality and advertising in medicine. The intense advertising of a large for-profit hospital chain in our community raises the same question on a different scale: How does one monitor the veracity of institutional advertising? It is easier to evaluate the credentials of physicians than those of institutions advertising themselves as “centers” for a particular disease, with little expertise to support the claim. On the one hand,.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-119
Number of pages3
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume318
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 14 1988

Fingerprint

Physicians
Cerebral Palsy
Emotions
Medicine
Professionalism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Smith, P. W., Keefe, A. T., Langsley, D. G., Denenberg, S. M., Smith, H. W., Rohr, R. E., ... Ratzan, R. M. (1988). Specialization in the Yellow Pages. New England Journal of Medicine, 318(2), 117-119. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198801143180212

Specialization in the Yellow Pages. / Smith, Philip W.; Keefe, Arthur T.; Langsley, Donald G.; Denenberg, Steven M.; Smith, Howard W.; Rohr, Richard E.; Reade, Julia M.; Ratzan, Richard M.

In: New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 318, No. 2, 14.01.1988, p. 117-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Smith, PW, Keefe, AT, Langsley, DG, Denenberg, SM, Smith, HW, Rohr, RE, Reade, JM & Ratzan, RM 1988, 'Specialization in the Yellow Pages', New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 318, no. 2, pp. 117-119. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198801143180212
Smith PW, Keefe AT, Langsley DG, Denenberg SM, Smith HW, Rohr RE et al. Specialization in the Yellow Pages. New England Journal of Medicine. 1988 Jan 14;318(2):117-119. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198801143180212
Smith, Philip W. ; Keefe, Arthur T. ; Langsley, Donald G. ; Denenberg, Steven M. ; Smith, Howard W. ; Rohr, Richard E. ; Reade, Julia M. ; Ratzan, Richard M. / Specialization in the Yellow Pages. In: New England Journal of Medicine. 1988 ; Vol. 318, No. 2. pp. 117-119.
@article{e295be98afd44d659936e473f0ef8a71,
title = "Specialization in the Yellow Pages",
abstract = "To the Editor: The article on yellow professionalism in the May 21 issue* is compatible with the intuitive feeling of many physicians that there is an inverse (or at best, a random) relation between quality and advertising in medicine. The intense advertising of a large for-profit hospital chain in our community raises the same question on a different scale: How does one monitor the veracity of institutional advertising? It is easier to evaluate the credentials of physicians than those of institutions advertising themselves as “centers” for a particular disease, with little expertise to support the claim. On the one hand,.",
author = "Smith, {Philip W.} and Keefe, {Arthur T.} and Langsley, {Donald G.} and Denenberg, {Steven M.} and Smith, {Howard W.} and Rohr, {Richard E.} and Reade, {Julia M.} and Ratzan, {Richard M.}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1056/NEJM198801143180212",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "318",
pages = "117--119",
journal = "New England Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0028-4793",
publisher = "Massachussetts Medical Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Specialization in the Yellow Pages

AU - Smith, Philip W.

AU - Keefe, Arthur T.

AU - Langsley, Donald G.

AU - Denenberg, Steven M.

AU - Smith, Howard W.

AU - Rohr, Richard E.

AU - Reade, Julia M.

AU - Ratzan, Richard M.

PY - 1988/1/14

Y1 - 1988/1/14

N2 - To the Editor: The article on yellow professionalism in the May 21 issue* is compatible with the intuitive feeling of many physicians that there is an inverse (or at best, a random) relation between quality and advertising in medicine. The intense advertising of a large for-profit hospital chain in our community raises the same question on a different scale: How does one monitor the veracity of institutional advertising? It is easier to evaluate the credentials of physicians than those of institutions advertising themselves as “centers” for a particular disease, with little expertise to support the claim. On the one hand,.

AB - To the Editor: The article on yellow professionalism in the May 21 issue* is compatible with the intuitive feeling of many physicians that there is an inverse (or at best, a random) relation between quality and advertising in medicine. The intense advertising of a large for-profit hospital chain in our community raises the same question on a different scale: How does one monitor the veracity of institutional advertising? It is easier to evaluate the credentials of physicians than those of institutions advertising themselves as “centers” for a particular disease, with little expertise to support the claim. On the one hand,.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023874311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023874311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1056/NEJM198801143180212

DO - 10.1056/NEJM198801143180212

M3 - Letter

C2 - 3336391

AN - SCOPUS:0023874311

VL - 318

SP - 117

EP - 119

JO - New England Journal of Medicine

JF - New England Journal of Medicine

SN - 0028-4793

IS - 2

ER -