Speaking Different Languages or Reading from the Same Script? Word Usage of Democratic and Republican Politicians

Jayme L. Neiman, Frank J. Gonzalez, Kevin Wilkinson, Kevin B. Smith, John R Hibbing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Words are believed to be indicators of the values that are important to politicians and an impressive amount of empirical research has analyzed variations in language use. While it is generally accepted that there are value differences between Democrats and Republicans, the extent to which these differences are reflected in word usage has been theorized but is largely untested. The connection between values and language is, theoretically, not limited just to politicians, but should be especially evident among politicians as representatives of existing ideological poles. In this article, we examine elite rhetoric through the lens of four value-centered theoretical frameworks (Lakoff’s Parenting Styles model, Moral Foundations Theory, Schwartz’s Values Theory, and Motivated Social Cognition Theory). Contrary to the expectations posited by these four theories, we find little reliable evidence of value-related language differences between Democratic and Republican politicians. Our findings suggest that, at least when it comes to elite rhetoric, widely accepted theoretical claims about the value-based nature of political language and political differences are not consistently supported by empirical analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)212-240
Number of pages29
JournalPolitical Communication
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2 2016

Fingerprint

politician
speaking
Poles
Lenses
language
Values
rhetoric
elite
political language
value theory
parenting style
social cognition
Pole
empirical research
evidence

Keywords

  • Lakoff
  • elites
  • language
  • moral foundations
  • values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Speaking Different Languages or Reading from the Same Script? Word Usage of Democratic and Republican Politicians. / Neiman, Jayme L.; Gonzalez, Frank J.; Wilkinson, Kevin; Smith, Kevin B.; Hibbing, John R.

In: Political Communication, Vol. 33, No. 2, 02.04.2016, p. 212-240.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Neiman, Jayme L. ; Gonzalez, Frank J. ; Wilkinson, Kevin ; Smith, Kevin B. ; Hibbing, John R. / Speaking Different Languages or Reading from the Same Script? Word Usage of Democratic and Republican Politicians. In: Political Communication. 2016 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 212-240.
@article{f07d4d8111694cd2b42c63d820cce220,
title = "Speaking Different Languages or Reading from the Same Script? Word Usage of Democratic and Republican Politicians",
abstract = "Words are believed to be indicators of the values that are important to politicians and an impressive amount of empirical research has analyzed variations in language use. While it is generally accepted that there are value differences between Democrats and Republicans, the extent to which these differences are reflected in word usage has been theorized but is largely untested. The connection between values and language is, theoretically, not limited just to politicians, but should be especially evident among politicians as representatives of existing ideological poles. In this article, we examine elite rhetoric through the lens of four value-centered theoretical frameworks (Lakoff’s Parenting Styles model, Moral Foundations Theory, Schwartz’s Values Theory, and Motivated Social Cognition Theory). Contrary to the expectations posited by these four theories, we find little reliable evidence of value-related language differences between Democratic and Republican politicians. Our findings suggest that, at least when it comes to elite rhetoric, widely accepted theoretical claims about the value-based nature of political language and political differences are not consistently supported by empirical analysis.",
keywords = "Lakoff, elites, language, moral foundations, values",
author = "Neiman, {Jayme L.} and Gonzalez, {Frank J.} and Kevin Wilkinson and Smith, {Kevin B.} and Hibbing, {John R}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10584609.2014.969465",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "212--240",
journal = "Political Communication",
issn = "1058-4609",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Speaking Different Languages or Reading from the Same Script? Word Usage of Democratic and Republican Politicians

AU - Neiman, Jayme L.

AU - Gonzalez, Frank J.

AU - Wilkinson, Kevin

AU - Smith, Kevin B.

AU - Hibbing, John R

PY - 2016/4/2

Y1 - 2016/4/2

N2 - Words are believed to be indicators of the values that are important to politicians and an impressive amount of empirical research has analyzed variations in language use. While it is generally accepted that there are value differences between Democrats and Republicans, the extent to which these differences are reflected in word usage has been theorized but is largely untested. The connection between values and language is, theoretically, not limited just to politicians, but should be especially evident among politicians as representatives of existing ideological poles. In this article, we examine elite rhetoric through the lens of four value-centered theoretical frameworks (Lakoff’s Parenting Styles model, Moral Foundations Theory, Schwartz’s Values Theory, and Motivated Social Cognition Theory). Contrary to the expectations posited by these four theories, we find little reliable evidence of value-related language differences between Democratic and Republican politicians. Our findings suggest that, at least when it comes to elite rhetoric, widely accepted theoretical claims about the value-based nature of political language and political differences are not consistently supported by empirical analysis.

AB - Words are believed to be indicators of the values that are important to politicians and an impressive amount of empirical research has analyzed variations in language use. While it is generally accepted that there are value differences between Democrats and Republicans, the extent to which these differences are reflected in word usage has been theorized but is largely untested. The connection between values and language is, theoretically, not limited just to politicians, but should be especially evident among politicians as representatives of existing ideological poles. In this article, we examine elite rhetoric through the lens of four value-centered theoretical frameworks (Lakoff’s Parenting Styles model, Moral Foundations Theory, Schwartz’s Values Theory, and Motivated Social Cognition Theory). Contrary to the expectations posited by these four theories, we find little reliable evidence of value-related language differences between Democratic and Republican politicians. Our findings suggest that, at least when it comes to elite rhetoric, widely accepted theoretical claims about the value-based nature of political language and political differences are not consistently supported by empirical analysis.

KW - Lakoff

KW - elites

KW - language

KW - moral foundations

KW - values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928242532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928242532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10584609.2014.969465

DO - 10.1080/10584609.2014.969465

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928242532

VL - 33

SP - 212

EP - 240

JO - Political Communication

JF - Political Communication

SN - 1058-4609

IS - 2

ER -