Spatial attention: Normal processes and their breakdown

Shaun P. Vecera, Matthew Rizzo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although "attention" is a general term in everyday folk and psychologic use, using research from cognitive psychology allows a focus on the processes associated with attention. A process-oriented definition of attention [2] makes "attention"a concept that can be studied rigorously. Attention is necessary for eliminating unwanted sensory inputs or irrelevant behavioral tasks and is useful when some cognitive system or process receives too many inputs. Attention acts to restrict the number of inputs and allow processing to continue in an effective manner. Although there are many forms of attentional selection, spatial attention is the most studied and perhaps the best understood form of selection. Spatial attention is the variety of attention most widely studied in neuropsychologic populations. As was evident from the authors' review, different neuropsychologic syndromes can be characterized as involving different difficulties with the component processes of spatial attention. Different neural structures work in concert to produce normal spatial selection, and damage to any of these neural structures, including the parietal and frontal lobes, pulvinar, and superior colliculus, produce an attentional impairment. Attentional impairments often have been studied in cases of focal brain damage resulting from stroke, traumatic brain injury, tumor, and surgical resection. Focal or multifocal lesions caused by neurodegenerative impairments, such as PSP and AD, however, also have marked effects on neural processes of attention. Patients with AD exhibit a range of impairments in spatial attention, and these impairments have been studied relatively little. Despite the understanding of attention provided by various patient populations, gaps remain in knowledge of the mechanisms involved in attending to space. For example, most studies of neurologic patients have used a simple spatial cuing paradigm with highly predictive cues. Although this task yields robust results and can be adapted for use with many different patient groups, the spatial cuing effects produced by such tasks have multiple interpretations (eg, allocation of resources versus reduction of decision noise). This review highlights the general point that different neural sites seem to be responsible for different forms of attentional control, such as object-based attention, attentional task switching, and the executive control of attention [8,33]. Understanding the integration of these neural sites and their relationship to cognitive processes and, ultimately, behavior, will increase understanding of normal and disordered attentional selection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)575-607
Number of pages33
JournalNeurologic Clinics
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2003

Fingerprint

Pulvinar
Parietal Lobe
Resource Allocation
Superior Colliculi
Executive Function
Frontal Lobe
Brain Neoplasms
Nervous System
Population
Cues
Noise
Stroke
Psychology
Brain
Research
Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax
Traumatic Brain Injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Spatial attention : Normal processes and their breakdown. / Vecera, Shaun P.; Rizzo, Matthew.

In: Neurologic Clinics, Vol. 21, No. 3, 08.2003, p. 575-607.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Vecera, Shaun P. ; Rizzo, Matthew. / Spatial attention : Normal processes and their breakdown. In: Neurologic Clinics. 2003 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 575-607.
@article{100a3fe4ebe74cb7819fd3b79f696d97,
title = "Spatial attention: Normal processes and their breakdown",
abstract = "Although {"}attention{"} is a general term in everyday folk and psychologic use, using research from cognitive psychology allows a focus on the processes associated with attention. A process-oriented definition of attention [2] makes {"}attention{"}a concept that can be studied rigorously. Attention is necessary for eliminating unwanted sensory inputs or irrelevant behavioral tasks and is useful when some cognitive system or process receives too many inputs. Attention acts to restrict the number of inputs and allow processing to continue in an effective manner. Although there are many forms of attentional selection, spatial attention is the most studied and perhaps the best understood form of selection. Spatial attention is the variety of attention most widely studied in neuropsychologic populations. As was evident from the authors' review, different neuropsychologic syndromes can be characterized as involving different difficulties with the component processes of spatial attention. Different neural structures work in concert to produce normal spatial selection, and damage to any of these neural structures, including the parietal and frontal lobes, pulvinar, and superior colliculus, produce an attentional impairment. Attentional impairments often have been studied in cases of focal brain damage resulting from stroke, traumatic brain injury, tumor, and surgical resection. Focal or multifocal lesions caused by neurodegenerative impairments, such as PSP and AD, however, also have marked effects on neural processes of attention. Patients with AD exhibit a range of impairments in spatial attention, and these impairments have been studied relatively little. Despite the understanding of attention provided by various patient populations, gaps remain in knowledge of the mechanisms involved in attending to space. For example, most studies of neurologic patients have used a simple spatial cuing paradigm with highly predictive cues. Although this task yields robust results and can be adapted for use with many different patient groups, the spatial cuing effects produced by such tasks have multiple interpretations (eg, allocation of resources versus reduction of decision noise). This review highlights the general point that different neural sites seem to be responsible for different forms of attentional control, such as object-based attention, attentional task switching, and the executive control of attention [8,33]. Understanding the integration of these neural sites and their relationship to cognitive processes and, ultimately, behavior, will increase understanding of normal and disordered attentional selection.",
author = "Vecera, {Shaun P.} and Matthew Rizzo",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/S0733-8619(02)00103-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "575--607",
journal = "Neurologic Clinics",
issn = "0733-8619",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial attention

T2 - Normal processes and their breakdown

AU - Vecera, Shaun P.

AU - Rizzo, Matthew

PY - 2003/8

Y1 - 2003/8

N2 - Although "attention" is a general term in everyday folk and psychologic use, using research from cognitive psychology allows a focus on the processes associated with attention. A process-oriented definition of attention [2] makes "attention"a concept that can be studied rigorously. Attention is necessary for eliminating unwanted sensory inputs or irrelevant behavioral tasks and is useful when some cognitive system or process receives too many inputs. Attention acts to restrict the number of inputs and allow processing to continue in an effective manner. Although there are many forms of attentional selection, spatial attention is the most studied and perhaps the best understood form of selection. Spatial attention is the variety of attention most widely studied in neuropsychologic populations. As was evident from the authors' review, different neuropsychologic syndromes can be characterized as involving different difficulties with the component processes of spatial attention. Different neural structures work in concert to produce normal spatial selection, and damage to any of these neural structures, including the parietal and frontal lobes, pulvinar, and superior colliculus, produce an attentional impairment. Attentional impairments often have been studied in cases of focal brain damage resulting from stroke, traumatic brain injury, tumor, and surgical resection. Focal or multifocal lesions caused by neurodegenerative impairments, such as PSP and AD, however, also have marked effects on neural processes of attention. Patients with AD exhibit a range of impairments in spatial attention, and these impairments have been studied relatively little. Despite the understanding of attention provided by various patient populations, gaps remain in knowledge of the mechanisms involved in attending to space. For example, most studies of neurologic patients have used a simple spatial cuing paradigm with highly predictive cues. Although this task yields robust results and can be adapted for use with many different patient groups, the spatial cuing effects produced by such tasks have multiple interpretations (eg, allocation of resources versus reduction of decision noise). This review highlights the general point that different neural sites seem to be responsible for different forms of attentional control, such as object-based attention, attentional task switching, and the executive control of attention [8,33]. Understanding the integration of these neural sites and their relationship to cognitive processes and, ultimately, behavior, will increase understanding of normal and disordered attentional selection.

AB - Although "attention" is a general term in everyday folk and psychologic use, using research from cognitive psychology allows a focus on the processes associated with attention. A process-oriented definition of attention [2] makes "attention"a concept that can be studied rigorously. Attention is necessary for eliminating unwanted sensory inputs or irrelevant behavioral tasks and is useful when some cognitive system or process receives too many inputs. Attention acts to restrict the number of inputs and allow processing to continue in an effective manner. Although there are many forms of attentional selection, spatial attention is the most studied and perhaps the best understood form of selection. Spatial attention is the variety of attention most widely studied in neuropsychologic populations. As was evident from the authors' review, different neuropsychologic syndromes can be characterized as involving different difficulties with the component processes of spatial attention. Different neural structures work in concert to produce normal spatial selection, and damage to any of these neural structures, including the parietal and frontal lobes, pulvinar, and superior colliculus, produce an attentional impairment. Attentional impairments often have been studied in cases of focal brain damage resulting from stroke, traumatic brain injury, tumor, and surgical resection. Focal or multifocal lesions caused by neurodegenerative impairments, such as PSP and AD, however, also have marked effects on neural processes of attention. Patients with AD exhibit a range of impairments in spatial attention, and these impairments have been studied relatively little. Despite the understanding of attention provided by various patient populations, gaps remain in knowledge of the mechanisms involved in attending to space. For example, most studies of neurologic patients have used a simple spatial cuing paradigm with highly predictive cues. Although this task yields robust results and can be adapted for use with many different patient groups, the spatial cuing effects produced by such tasks have multiple interpretations (eg, allocation of resources versus reduction of decision noise). This review highlights the general point that different neural sites seem to be responsible for different forms of attentional control, such as object-based attention, attentional task switching, and the executive control of attention [8,33]. Understanding the integration of these neural sites and their relationship to cognitive processes and, ultimately, behavior, will increase understanding of normal and disordered attentional selection.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037902000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037902000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0733-8619(02)00103-2

DO - 10.1016/S0733-8619(02)00103-2

M3 - Review article

C2 - 13677814

AN - SCOPUS:0037902000

VL - 21

SP - 575

EP - 607

JO - Neurologic Clinics

JF - Neurologic Clinics

SN - 0733-8619

IS - 3

ER -