Socioeconomic differences in the effectiveness of the removal of the "light" descriptor on cigarette packs

Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) Thailand survey

Mohammad Siahpush, Ron Borland, Geoffrey T. Fong, Tara Elton-Marshall, Hua Hie Yong, Charamporn Holumyong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many smokers incorrectly believe that -light cigarettes are less harmful than regular cigarettes. To address this problem, many countries have banned -light or -mild brand descriptors on cigarette packs. Our objective was to assess whether beliefs about -light cigarettes changed following the 2007 removal of these brand descriptors in Thailand and, if a change occurred, the extent to which it differed by socioeconomic status. Data were from waves 2 (2006), 3 (2008), and 4 (2009) of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Thailand Survey of adult smokers in Thailand. The results showed that, following the introduction of the ban, there was an overall decline in the two beliefs that "light" cigarettes are less harmful and smoother than regular cigarettes. The decline in the "less harmful" belief was considerably steeper in lower income and education groups. However, there was no evidence that the rate of decline in the"smoother" belief varied by income or education. Removing the "light" brand descriptor from cigarette packs should thus be viewed not only as a means to address the problem of smokers'incorrect beliefs about "light" cigarettes, but also as a factor that can potentially reduce socioeconomic disparities in smoking-related misconceptions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2170-2180
Number of pages11
JournalInternational journal of environmental research and public health
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011

Fingerprint

Thailand
Tobacco Products
Tobacco
Light
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires
Social Class
Smoking

Keywords

  • Light cigarettes
  • Socioeconomic position
  • Tobacco control policies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Socioeconomic differences in the effectiveness of the removal of the "light" descriptor on cigarette packs : Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) Thailand survey. / Siahpush, Mohammad; Borland, Ron; Fong, Geoffrey T.; Elton-Marshall, Tara; Yong, Hua Hie; Holumyong, Charamporn.

In: International journal of environmental research and public health, Vol. 8, No. 6, 01.06.2011, p. 2170-2180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3ab44033af794f3ca1c0ca64329e9747,
title = "Socioeconomic differences in the effectiveness of the removal of the {"}light{"} descriptor on cigarette packs: Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) Thailand survey",
abstract = "Many smokers incorrectly believe that -light cigarettes are less harmful than regular cigarettes. To address this problem, many countries have banned -light or -mild brand descriptors on cigarette packs. Our objective was to assess whether beliefs about -light cigarettes changed following the 2007 removal of these brand descriptors in Thailand and, if a change occurred, the extent to which it differed by socioeconomic status. Data were from waves 2 (2006), 3 (2008), and 4 (2009) of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Thailand Survey of adult smokers in Thailand. The results showed that, following the introduction of the ban, there was an overall decline in the two beliefs that {"}light{"} cigarettes are less harmful and smoother than regular cigarettes. The decline in the {"}less harmful{"} belief was considerably steeper in lower income and education groups. However, there was no evidence that the rate of decline in the{"}smoother{"} belief varied by income or education. Removing the {"}light{"} brand descriptor from cigarette packs should thus be viewed not only as a means to address the problem of smokers'incorrect beliefs about {"}light{"} cigarettes, but also as a factor that can potentially reduce socioeconomic disparities in smoking-related misconceptions.",
keywords = "Light cigarettes, Socioeconomic position, Tobacco control policies",
author = "Mohammad Siahpush and Ron Borland and Fong, {Geoffrey T.} and Tara Elton-Marshall and Yong, {Hua Hie} and Charamporn Holumyong",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/ijerph8062170",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "2170--2180",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
issn = "1661-7827",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socioeconomic differences in the effectiveness of the removal of the "light" descriptor on cigarette packs

T2 - Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) Thailand survey

AU - Siahpush, Mohammad

AU - Borland, Ron

AU - Fong, Geoffrey T.

AU - Elton-Marshall, Tara

AU - Yong, Hua Hie

AU - Holumyong, Charamporn

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - Many smokers incorrectly believe that -light cigarettes are less harmful than regular cigarettes. To address this problem, many countries have banned -light or -mild brand descriptors on cigarette packs. Our objective was to assess whether beliefs about -light cigarettes changed following the 2007 removal of these brand descriptors in Thailand and, if a change occurred, the extent to which it differed by socioeconomic status. Data were from waves 2 (2006), 3 (2008), and 4 (2009) of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Thailand Survey of adult smokers in Thailand. The results showed that, following the introduction of the ban, there was an overall decline in the two beliefs that "light" cigarettes are less harmful and smoother than regular cigarettes. The decline in the "less harmful" belief was considerably steeper in lower income and education groups. However, there was no evidence that the rate of decline in the"smoother" belief varied by income or education. Removing the "light" brand descriptor from cigarette packs should thus be viewed not only as a means to address the problem of smokers'incorrect beliefs about "light" cigarettes, but also as a factor that can potentially reduce socioeconomic disparities in smoking-related misconceptions.

AB - Many smokers incorrectly believe that -light cigarettes are less harmful than regular cigarettes. To address this problem, many countries have banned -light or -mild brand descriptors on cigarette packs. Our objective was to assess whether beliefs about -light cigarettes changed following the 2007 removal of these brand descriptors in Thailand and, if a change occurred, the extent to which it differed by socioeconomic status. Data were from waves 2 (2006), 3 (2008), and 4 (2009) of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Thailand Survey of adult smokers in Thailand. The results showed that, following the introduction of the ban, there was an overall decline in the two beliefs that "light" cigarettes are less harmful and smoother than regular cigarettes. The decline in the "less harmful" belief was considerably steeper in lower income and education groups. However, there was no evidence that the rate of decline in the"smoother" belief varied by income or education. Removing the "light" brand descriptor from cigarette packs should thus be viewed not only as a means to address the problem of smokers'incorrect beliefs about "light" cigarettes, but also as a factor that can potentially reduce socioeconomic disparities in smoking-related misconceptions.

KW - Light cigarettes

KW - Socioeconomic position

KW - Tobacco control policies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959827030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959827030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph8062170

DO - 10.3390/ijerph8062170

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 2170

EP - 2180

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

SN - 1661-7827

IS - 6

ER -