Social Contexts of Infant Feeding and Infant Feeding Decisions

Ellen J. Schafer, Natalie A Williams, S. Digney, Marion E. Hare, Sato Ashida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Infant feeding takes place within a network of social relationships. However, the social context in which infant feeding advice is received remains underresearched. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the social contexts of infant feeding by examining individual and relationship characteristics of mothers and network members associated with advice to exclusively breastfeed, exclusively formula feed, or use a combination of breast milk and formula. Methods: Information about 287 network members was reported by 80 low-income mothers during a one-time survey. Characteristics of relationships associated with mothers receiving advice (exclusively breastfeed/formula feed, combination feed) from each network member were identified using 2-level logistic regression analyses. Results: Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively breastfeed from network members who help make feeding decisions (odds ratio [OR], 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-4.42), exclusively breastfed their own child or children (OR, 6.99; 95% CI, 2.96-16.51), and were health care providers (OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.70-13.67). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to breastfeed in combination with formula from network members who provided emotional support (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.31-4.55), combination fed their own child or children (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 1.80-13.05), and had an opinion that was important to the mother (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.13-6.33). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively formula feed from network members who exclusively formula fed their own child or children (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.07-4.66) than those who did not. Conclusion: Social relationship characteristics and network members' infant feeding experiences may have implications for the advice new mothers receive. Future research should investigate social contexts of infant feeding longitudinally to inform interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)132-140
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Human Lactation
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Mothers
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Social Support
Human Milk
Health Personnel
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • behaviors
  • breastfeeding
  • breastfeeding support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Social Contexts of Infant Feeding and Infant Feeding Decisions. / Schafer, Ellen J.; Williams, Natalie A; Digney, S.; Hare, Marion E.; Ashida, Sato.

In: Journal of Human Lactation, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 132-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schafer, Ellen J. ; Williams, Natalie A ; Digney, S. ; Hare, Marion E. ; Ashida, Sato. / Social Contexts of Infant Feeding and Infant Feeding Decisions. In: Journal of Human Lactation. 2016 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 132-140.
@article{d732484f8d034727bb21c20c77afe022,
title = "Social Contexts of Infant Feeding and Infant Feeding Decisions",
abstract = "Background: Infant feeding takes place within a network of social relationships. However, the social context in which infant feeding advice is received remains underresearched. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the social contexts of infant feeding by examining individual and relationship characteristics of mothers and network members associated with advice to exclusively breastfeed, exclusively formula feed, or use a combination of breast milk and formula. Methods: Information about 287 network members was reported by 80 low-income mothers during a one-time survey. Characteristics of relationships associated with mothers receiving advice (exclusively breastfeed/formula feed, combination feed) from each network member were identified using 2-level logistic regression analyses. Results: Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively breastfeed from network members who help make feeding decisions (odds ratio [OR], 2.44; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 1.35-4.42), exclusively breastfed their own child or children (OR, 6.99; 95{\%} CI, 2.96-16.51), and were health care providers (OR, 4.82; 95{\%} CI, 1.70-13.67). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to breastfeed in combination with formula from network members who provided emotional support (OR, 2.45; 95{\%} CI, 1.31-4.55), combination fed their own child or children (OR, 4.85; 95{\%} CI, 1.80-13.05), and had an opinion that was important to the mother (OR, 2.67; 95{\%} CI, 1.13-6.33). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively formula feed from network members who exclusively formula fed their own child or children (OR, 2.23; 95{\%} CI, 1.07-4.66) than those who did not. Conclusion: Social relationship characteristics and network members' infant feeding experiences may have implications for the advice new mothers receive. Future research should investigate social contexts of infant feeding longitudinally to inform interventions.",
keywords = "behaviors, breastfeeding, breastfeeding support",
author = "Schafer, {Ellen J.} and Williams, {Natalie A} and S. Digney and Hare, {Marion E.} and Sato Ashida",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0890334415592850",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "132--140",
journal = "Journal of Human Lactation",
issn = "0890-3344",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Contexts of Infant Feeding and Infant Feeding Decisions

AU - Schafer, Ellen J.

AU - Williams, Natalie A

AU - Digney, S.

AU - Hare, Marion E.

AU - Ashida, Sato

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Background: Infant feeding takes place within a network of social relationships. However, the social context in which infant feeding advice is received remains underresearched. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the social contexts of infant feeding by examining individual and relationship characteristics of mothers and network members associated with advice to exclusively breastfeed, exclusively formula feed, or use a combination of breast milk and formula. Methods: Information about 287 network members was reported by 80 low-income mothers during a one-time survey. Characteristics of relationships associated with mothers receiving advice (exclusively breastfeed/formula feed, combination feed) from each network member were identified using 2-level logistic regression analyses. Results: Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively breastfeed from network members who help make feeding decisions (odds ratio [OR], 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-4.42), exclusively breastfed their own child or children (OR, 6.99; 95% CI, 2.96-16.51), and were health care providers (OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.70-13.67). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to breastfeed in combination with formula from network members who provided emotional support (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.31-4.55), combination fed their own child or children (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 1.80-13.05), and had an opinion that was important to the mother (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.13-6.33). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively formula feed from network members who exclusively formula fed their own child or children (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.07-4.66) than those who did not. Conclusion: Social relationship characteristics and network members' infant feeding experiences may have implications for the advice new mothers receive. Future research should investigate social contexts of infant feeding longitudinally to inform interventions.

AB - Background: Infant feeding takes place within a network of social relationships. However, the social context in which infant feeding advice is received remains underresearched. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the social contexts of infant feeding by examining individual and relationship characteristics of mothers and network members associated with advice to exclusively breastfeed, exclusively formula feed, or use a combination of breast milk and formula. Methods: Information about 287 network members was reported by 80 low-income mothers during a one-time survey. Characteristics of relationships associated with mothers receiving advice (exclusively breastfeed/formula feed, combination feed) from each network member were identified using 2-level logistic regression analyses. Results: Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively breastfeed from network members who help make feeding decisions (odds ratio [OR], 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-4.42), exclusively breastfed their own child or children (OR, 6.99; 95% CI, 2.96-16.51), and were health care providers (OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.70-13.67). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to breastfeed in combination with formula from network members who provided emotional support (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.31-4.55), combination fed their own child or children (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 1.80-13.05), and had an opinion that was important to the mother (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.13-6.33). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively formula feed from network members who exclusively formula fed their own child or children (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.07-4.66) than those who did not. Conclusion: Social relationship characteristics and network members' infant feeding experiences may have implications for the advice new mothers receive. Future research should investigate social contexts of infant feeding longitudinally to inform interventions.

KW - behaviors

KW - breastfeeding

KW - breastfeeding support

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953872489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953872489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0890334415592850

DO - 10.1177/0890334415592850

M3 - Article

C2 - 26744497

AN - SCOPUS:84953872489

VL - 32

SP - 132

EP - 140

JO - Journal of Human Lactation

JF - Journal of Human Lactation

SN - 0890-3344

IS - 1

ER -