Social analytic investigation of hostile work environments - A test of the reasonable woman standard

Richard L. Wiener, Barbara A. Watts, Kristen H. Goldkamp, Charles Gasper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a brief psycholegal analysis of hostile work environment sexual harassment law especially as it distinguishes between the reasonable person and reasonable woman tests of severity and pervasiveness. We tested two hypotheses: (1) women (but not men) would show stronger judgments of harassment when using the reasonable woman standard, and (2) this relationship would be strongest for women who identified with harassed victims and men who did not. We presented to a sample of undergraduates an in-group identification measurement task followed by the fact patterns in two cases and asked them to make legally relevant decisions under either the reasonable woman or person standard. Although we found gender and in-group identification effects, we found no legal standard effects. The results are discussed from the perspectives of law and psychology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-281
Number of pages19
JournalLaw and human behavior
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 1995

Fingerprint

work environment
Social Identification
Sexual Harassment
human being
Law
sexual harassment
psychology
Group
Work Environment
Psychology
gender
Person

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Cite this

Social analytic investigation of hostile work environments - A test of the reasonable woman standard. / Wiener, Richard L.; Watts, Barbara A.; Goldkamp, Kristen H.; Gasper, Charles.

In: Law and human behavior, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.06.1995, p. 263-281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wiener, Richard L. ; Watts, Barbara A. ; Goldkamp, Kristen H. ; Gasper, Charles. / Social analytic investigation of hostile work environments - A test of the reasonable woman standard. In: Law and human behavior. 1995 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 263-281.
@article{d99573bbc199498895ab25a2a3c02b58,
title = "Social analytic investigation of hostile work environments - A test of the reasonable woman standard",
abstract = "This paper presents a brief psycholegal analysis of hostile work environment sexual harassment law especially as it distinguishes between the reasonable person and reasonable woman tests of severity and pervasiveness. We tested two hypotheses: (1) women (but not men) would show stronger judgments of harassment when using the reasonable woman standard, and (2) this relationship would be strongest for women who identified with harassed victims and men who did not. We presented to a sample of undergraduates an in-group identification measurement task followed by the fact patterns in two cases and asked them to make legally relevant decisions under either the reasonable woman or person standard. Although we found gender and in-group identification effects, we found no legal standard effects. The results are discussed from the perspectives of law and psychology.",
author = "Wiener, {Richard L.} and Watts, {Barbara A.} and Goldkamp, {Kristen H.} and Charles Gasper",
year = "1995",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF01501660",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "263--281",
journal = "Law and Human Behavior",
issn = "0147-7307",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social analytic investigation of hostile work environments - A test of the reasonable woman standard

AU - Wiener, Richard L.

AU - Watts, Barbara A.

AU - Goldkamp, Kristen H.

AU - Gasper, Charles

PY - 1995/6/1

Y1 - 1995/6/1

N2 - This paper presents a brief psycholegal analysis of hostile work environment sexual harassment law especially as it distinguishes between the reasonable person and reasonable woman tests of severity and pervasiveness. We tested two hypotheses: (1) women (but not men) would show stronger judgments of harassment when using the reasonable woman standard, and (2) this relationship would be strongest for women who identified with harassed victims and men who did not. We presented to a sample of undergraduates an in-group identification measurement task followed by the fact patterns in two cases and asked them to make legally relevant decisions under either the reasonable woman or person standard. Although we found gender and in-group identification effects, we found no legal standard effects. The results are discussed from the perspectives of law and psychology.

AB - This paper presents a brief psycholegal analysis of hostile work environment sexual harassment law especially as it distinguishes between the reasonable person and reasonable woman tests of severity and pervasiveness. We tested two hypotheses: (1) women (but not men) would show stronger judgments of harassment when using the reasonable woman standard, and (2) this relationship would be strongest for women who identified with harassed victims and men who did not. We presented to a sample of undergraduates an in-group identification measurement task followed by the fact patterns in two cases and asked them to make legally relevant decisions under either the reasonable woman or person standard. Although we found gender and in-group identification effects, we found no legal standard effects. The results are discussed from the perspectives of law and psychology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028997117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028997117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01501660

DO - 10.1007/BF01501660

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0028997117

VL - 19

SP - 263

EP - 281

JO - Law and Human Behavior

JF - Law and Human Behavior

SN - 0147-7307

IS - 3

ER -