Smoking and inadequate housing: Results from an Australian national survey

K. Jamsen, M. Siahpush, J. A. Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the effect of: (a) the smoking status of the household; and (b) the amount spent on smoking by the household on inadequate housing. Study design: This was a cross-sectional study using data from the first wave of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey. Methods: A total of 7673 households were eligible for analysis. The outcome, inadequate housing, was derived from a questionnaire item asking respondents about the adequacy of their housing with respect to their housing needs in general. A house was defined as a smoking household if at least one member smoked. Amongst smoking households, the total amount spent on smoking per week was calculated. Other factors included in the analyses were education, occupation and age of the head of the household, household size, household disposable income and housing tenure. Results: There was evidence for an unadjusted association between being a smoking household and having inadequate housing [odds ratio (OR) 1.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32-2.03, P < 0.001]; however, after adjusting for indicators of socio-economic status and age, evidence for the association became much weaker (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.90-1.47, P = 0.262). For smoking households, there was little evidence for an association between inadequate housing and the amount spent on smoking by the household, either unadjusted or adjusted. Conclusions: It appears that antismoking policies will not enhance housing adequacy, which is predominantly affected by indicators of socio-economic status.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)873-877
Number of pages5
JournalPublic Health
Volume122
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2008

Fingerprint

smoking
Smoking
housing
household income
confidence
evidence
disposable income
household size
Surveys and Questionnaires
Odds Ratio
Economics
cross-sectional study
Confidence Intervals
economics
occupation
labor
Occupations
questionnaire
Cross-Sectional Studies
Education

Keywords

  • Inadequate housing
  • Smoking household

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Smoking and inadequate housing : Results from an Australian national survey. / Jamsen, K.; Siahpush, M.; Simpson, J. A.

In: Public Health, Vol. 122, No. 9, 01.09.2008, p. 873-877.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jamsen, K. ; Siahpush, M. ; Simpson, J. A. / Smoking and inadequate housing : Results from an Australian national survey. In: Public Health. 2008 ; Vol. 122, No. 9. pp. 873-877.
@article{f7791012e8724f3b842b57f07c9cce11,
title = "Smoking and inadequate housing: Results from an Australian national survey",
abstract = "Objectives: To examine the effect of: (a) the smoking status of the household; and (b) the amount spent on smoking by the household on inadequate housing. Study design: This was a cross-sectional study using data from the first wave of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey. Methods: A total of 7673 households were eligible for analysis. The outcome, inadequate housing, was derived from a questionnaire item asking respondents about the adequacy of their housing with respect to their housing needs in general. A house was defined as a smoking household if at least one member smoked. Amongst smoking households, the total amount spent on smoking per week was calculated. Other factors included in the analyses were education, occupation and age of the head of the household, household size, household disposable income and housing tenure. Results: There was evidence for an unadjusted association between being a smoking household and having inadequate housing [odds ratio (OR) 1.64, 95{\%} confidence interval (CI) 1.32-2.03, P < 0.001]; however, after adjusting for indicators of socio-economic status and age, evidence for the association became much weaker (OR 1.15, 95{\%} CI 0.90-1.47, P = 0.262). For smoking households, there was little evidence for an association between inadequate housing and the amount spent on smoking by the household, either unadjusted or adjusted. Conclusions: It appears that antismoking policies will not enhance housing adequacy, which is predominantly affected by indicators of socio-economic status.",
keywords = "Inadequate housing, Smoking household",
author = "K. Jamsen and M. Siahpush and Simpson, {J. A.}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.puhe.2008.01.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "873--877",
journal = "Public Health",
issn = "0033-3506",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Smoking and inadequate housing

T2 - Results from an Australian national survey

AU - Jamsen, K.

AU - Siahpush, M.

AU - Simpson, J. A.

PY - 2008/9/1

Y1 - 2008/9/1

N2 - Objectives: To examine the effect of: (a) the smoking status of the household; and (b) the amount spent on smoking by the household on inadequate housing. Study design: This was a cross-sectional study using data from the first wave of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey. Methods: A total of 7673 households were eligible for analysis. The outcome, inadequate housing, was derived from a questionnaire item asking respondents about the adequacy of their housing with respect to their housing needs in general. A house was defined as a smoking household if at least one member smoked. Amongst smoking households, the total amount spent on smoking per week was calculated. Other factors included in the analyses were education, occupation and age of the head of the household, household size, household disposable income and housing tenure. Results: There was evidence for an unadjusted association between being a smoking household and having inadequate housing [odds ratio (OR) 1.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32-2.03, P < 0.001]; however, after adjusting for indicators of socio-economic status and age, evidence for the association became much weaker (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.90-1.47, P = 0.262). For smoking households, there was little evidence for an association between inadequate housing and the amount spent on smoking by the household, either unadjusted or adjusted. Conclusions: It appears that antismoking policies will not enhance housing adequacy, which is predominantly affected by indicators of socio-economic status.

AB - Objectives: To examine the effect of: (a) the smoking status of the household; and (b) the amount spent on smoking by the household on inadequate housing. Study design: This was a cross-sectional study using data from the first wave of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey. Methods: A total of 7673 households were eligible for analysis. The outcome, inadequate housing, was derived from a questionnaire item asking respondents about the adequacy of their housing with respect to their housing needs in general. A house was defined as a smoking household if at least one member smoked. Amongst smoking households, the total amount spent on smoking per week was calculated. Other factors included in the analyses were education, occupation and age of the head of the household, household size, household disposable income and housing tenure. Results: There was evidence for an unadjusted association between being a smoking household and having inadequate housing [odds ratio (OR) 1.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32-2.03, P < 0.001]; however, after adjusting for indicators of socio-economic status and age, evidence for the association became much weaker (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.90-1.47, P = 0.262). For smoking households, there was little evidence for an association between inadequate housing and the amount spent on smoking by the household, either unadjusted or adjusted. Conclusions: It appears that antismoking policies will not enhance housing adequacy, which is predominantly affected by indicators of socio-economic status.

KW - Inadequate housing

KW - Smoking household

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50049130439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=50049130439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.01.013

DO - 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.01.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 18490038

AN - SCOPUS:50049130439

VL - 122

SP - 873

EP - 877

JO - Public Health

JF - Public Health

SN - 0033-3506

IS - 9

ER -