Situational dissatisfaction in congress

Explaining voluntary departures

Michael K. Moore, John R Hibbing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research on the motivations for voluntary departures from Congress has often focused on individual events, such as the check-writing scandal, on individual election years, such as 1974 or 1992, or has degenerated into a debate over whether or not members quit because the job is "no longer any fun." In this paper we use a dataset on House careers in the last half of the twentieth century and a synthetic theory to demonstrate that Congress is not universally "no fun," but rather that there are certain situations that lead some members to be less satisfied than others with congressional service. This notion fits well with the data and makes more sense than attempting to conclude whether Congress either is or is not fun. In the process, we show that members who are not achieving their goals are more likely than others to depart voluntarily from the U.S. House.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1088-1107
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume60
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

scandal
twentieth century
election
career
event

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Situational dissatisfaction in congress : Explaining voluntary departures. / Moore, Michael K.; Hibbing, John R.

In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 60, No. 4, 01.01.1998, p. 1088-1107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{621289f9baad46d9b9709b9362cbed99,
title = "Situational dissatisfaction in congress: Explaining voluntary departures",
abstract = "Previous research on the motivations for voluntary departures from Congress has often focused on individual events, such as the check-writing scandal, on individual election years, such as 1974 or 1992, or has degenerated into a debate over whether or not members quit because the job is {"}no longer any fun.{"} In this paper we use a dataset on House careers in the last half of the twentieth century and a synthetic theory to demonstrate that Congress is not universally {"}no fun,{"} but rather that there are certain situations that lead some members to be less satisfied than others with congressional service. This notion fits well with the data and makes more sense than attempting to conclude whether Congress either is or is not fun. In the process, we show that members who are not achieving their goals are more likely than others to depart voluntarily from the U.S. House.",
author = "Moore, {Michael K.} and Hibbing, {John R}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/2647732",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "1088--1107",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Situational dissatisfaction in congress

T2 - Explaining voluntary departures

AU - Moore, Michael K.

AU - Hibbing, John R

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Previous research on the motivations for voluntary departures from Congress has often focused on individual events, such as the check-writing scandal, on individual election years, such as 1974 or 1992, or has degenerated into a debate over whether or not members quit because the job is "no longer any fun." In this paper we use a dataset on House careers in the last half of the twentieth century and a synthetic theory to demonstrate that Congress is not universally "no fun," but rather that there are certain situations that lead some members to be less satisfied than others with congressional service. This notion fits well with the data and makes more sense than attempting to conclude whether Congress either is or is not fun. In the process, we show that members who are not achieving their goals are more likely than others to depart voluntarily from the U.S. House.

AB - Previous research on the motivations for voluntary departures from Congress has often focused on individual events, such as the check-writing scandal, on individual election years, such as 1974 or 1992, or has degenerated into a debate over whether or not members quit because the job is "no longer any fun." In this paper we use a dataset on House careers in the last half of the twentieth century and a synthetic theory to demonstrate that Congress is not universally "no fun," but rather that there are certain situations that lead some members to be less satisfied than others with congressional service. This notion fits well with the data and makes more sense than attempting to conclude whether Congress either is or is not fun. In the process, we show that members who are not achieving their goals are more likely than others to depart voluntarily from the U.S. House.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032194858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032194858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/2647732

DO - 10.2307/2647732

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 1088

EP - 1107

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 4

ER -