Sit Big to Eat Big: The Interaction of Body Posture and Body Concern on Restrained Eating

Jill Allen, Sarah J. Gervais, Jessi L. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Body image concern has long been linked with unhealthy restrained eating patterns among women, yet scant research has examined factors to disrupt this process. At the same time, feminine stereotypes prescribe that women should be small, restrict their movements, speak softly, and limit their food intake (e.g., through dieting). Here, we examined whether women's postural constriction or expansion moderated the relation between body shape concern and restrained eating, predicting that expansive postures would interrupt this robust relation. As a secondary aim, we investigated whether women spontaneously adopted constrictive postures and to what extent postures contributed to restrained eating under baseline conditions. Specifically, women's postural position (constricted, expanded, or baseline posture) was manipulated and restrained eating was measured. Results showed that at high levels of body shape concern, women sitting in expansive postures restrained their eating less compared to women in constrictive postures. Further, spontaneously expansive (vs. spontaneously constrictive) postures were associated with less restrained eating among women. Thus, postural expansion attenuated the link between body shape concern and restrained eating whereas postural constriction exacerbated the link. Implications for gender performativity and possible interventions for restrained eating are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-336
Number of pages12
JournalPsychology of Women Quarterly
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

Fingerprint

Posture
eating behavior
Eating
interaction
Constriction
Interaction
Eat
body image
Body Image
stereotype
food
gender
Research

Keywords

  • body image
  • body language
  • eating behavior
  • empowerment
  • objectification
  • posture
  • power

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Sit Big to Eat Big : The Interaction of Body Posture and Body Concern on Restrained Eating. / Allen, Jill; Gervais, Sarah J.; Smith, Jessi L.

In: Psychology of Women Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 3, 01.09.2013, p. 325-336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ebf5566159d84dbbb4e57c83572160b9,
title = "Sit Big to Eat Big: The Interaction of Body Posture and Body Concern on Restrained Eating",
abstract = "Body image concern has long been linked with unhealthy restrained eating patterns among women, yet scant research has examined factors to disrupt this process. At the same time, feminine stereotypes prescribe that women should be small, restrict their movements, speak softly, and limit their food intake (e.g., through dieting). Here, we examined whether women's postural constriction or expansion moderated the relation between body shape concern and restrained eating, predicting that expansive postures would interrupt this robust relation. As a secondary aim, we investigated whether women spontaneously adopted constrictive postures and to what extent postures contributed to restrained eating under baseline conditions. Specifically, women's postural position (constricted, expanded, or baseline posture) was manipulated and restrained eating was measured. Results showed that at high levels of body shape concern, women sitting in expansive postures restrained their eating less compared to women in constrictive postures. Further, spontaneously expansive (vs. spontaneously constrictive) postures were associated with less restrained eating among women. Thus, postural expansion attenuated the link between body shape concern and restrained eating whereas postural constriction exacerbated the link. Implications for gender performativity and possible interventions for restrained eating are discussed.",
keywords = "body image, body language, eating behavior, empowerment, objectification, posture, power",
author = "Jill Allen and Gervais, {Sarah J.} and Smith, {Jessi L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0361684313476477",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "325--336",
journal = "Psychology of Women Quarterly",
issn = "0361-6843",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sit Big to Eat Big

T2 - The Interaction of Body Posture and Body Concern on Restrained Eating

AU - Allen, Jill

AU - Gervais, Sarah J.

AU - Smith, Jessi L.

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - Body image concern has long been linked with unhealthy restrained eating patterns among women, yet scant research has examined factors to disrupt this process. At the same time, feminine stereotypes prescribe that women should be small, restrict their movements, speak softly, and limit their food intake (e.g., through dieting). Here, we examined whether women's postural constriction or expansion moderated the relation between body shape concern and restrained eating, predicting that expansive postures would interrupt this robust relation. As a secondary aim, we investigated whether women spontaneously adopted constrictive postures and to what extent postures contributed to restrained eating under baseline conditions. Specifically, women's postural position (constricted, expanded, or baseline posture) was manipulated and restrained eating was measured. Results showed that at high levels of body shape concern, women sitting in expansive postures restrained their eating less compared to women in constrictive postures. Further, spontaneously expansive (vs. spontaneously constrictive) postures were associated with less restrained eating among women. Thus, postural expansion attenuated the link between body shape concern and restrained eating whereas postural constriction exacerbated the link. Implications for gender performativity and possible interventions for restrained eating are discussed.

AB - Body image concern has long been linked with unhealthy restrained eating patterns among women, yet scant research has examined factors to disrupt this process. At the same time, feminine stereotypes prescribe that women should be small, restrict their movements, speak softly, and limit their food intake (e.g., through dieting). Here, we examined whether women's postural constriction or expansion moderated the relation between body shape concern and restrained eating, predicting that expansive postures would interrupt this robust relation. As a secondary aim, we investigated whether women spontaneously adopted constrictive postures and to what extent postures contributed to restrained eating under baseline conditions. Specifically, women's postural position (constricted, expanded, or baseline posture) was manipulated and restrained eating was measured. Results showed that at high levels of body shape concern, women sitting in expansive postures restrained their eating less compared to women in constrictive postures. Further, spontaneously expansive (vs. spontaneously constrictive) postures were associated with less restrained eating among women. Thus, postural expansion attenuated the link between body shape concern and restrained eating whereas postural constriction exacerbated the link. Implications for gender performativity and possible interventions for restrained eating are discussed.

KW - body image

KW - body language

KW - eating behavior

KW - empowerment

KW - objectification

KW - posture

KW - power

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880847959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880847959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0361684313476477

DO - 10.1177/0361684313476477

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84880847959

VL - 37

SP - 325

EP - 336

JO - Psychology of Women Quarterly

JF - Psychology of Women Quarterly

SN - 0361-6843

IS - 3

ER -