Single-dose vs multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in instrumented lumbar fusion-a prospective study

Leslie Carl Hellbusch, Michele Helzer-Julin, Stephen E. Doran, Lyal G. Leibrock, Douglas J. Long, Mark J Puccioni, William E Thorell, John S. Treves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This prospective investigation was designed to determine if the postoperative infection rate in instrumented lumbar spinal fusion is affected by postoperative antibiotic use. Methods: Two hundred sixty-nine patients were randomized into either a preoperative only protocol or preoperative with an extended postoperative antibiotic protocol. The preoperative only protocol received a single dose of cefazolin IV. The extended postoperative antibiotic protocol received the same preoperative dose plus postoperative cefazolin IV every 8 hours for 3 days followed by oral cephalexin every 6 hours for 7 days. Because of untoward drug reaction or deviation from the antibiotic protocol, 36 of the 269 patients were eliminated from the study. Therefore, 233 patients completed the entire study. Results: There was no significant difference in infection rates between the 2 antibiotic protocols. The postoperative infection rates were 4.3% for the preoperative only protocol and 1.7% for the preoperative with extended antibiotic protocol. The overall postoperative infection rate was 3%. However, 5 variables of blood transfusion, electrophysiologic monitoring, increased height, increased weight, and increased body mass index appeared to demonstrate a trend toward increase in infection rate. Increased tobacco use trended toward a lower infection rate. Conclusion: Statistical significance was not proven in this prospective study comparing single-dose preoperative antibiotic protocol vs preoperative with an extended postoperative antibiotic protocol. A larger study of 1400 patients would possibly provide more statistically significant information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)622-627
Number of pages6
JournalSurgical neurology
Volume70
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008

Fingerprint

Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Prospective Studies
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Infection
Cefazolin
Cephalexin
Spinal Fusion
Tobacco Use
Blood Transfusion
Body Mass Index
Weights and Measures
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • Antibiotic prophylaxis
  • Infection rate
  • Lumbar spinal fusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Single-dose vs multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in instrumented lumbar fusion-a prospective study. / Hellbusch, Leslie Carl; Helzer-Julin, Michele; Doran, Stephen E.; Leibrock, Lyal G.; Long, Douglas J.; Puccioni, Mark J; Thorell, William E; Treves, John S.

In: Surgical neurology, Vol. 70, No. 6, 01.12.2008, p. 622-627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hellbusch, Leslie Carl ; Helzer-Julin, Michele ; Doran, Stephen E. ; Leibrock, Lyal G. ; Long, Douglas J. ; Puccioni, Mark J ; Thorell, William E ; Treves, John S. / Single-dose vs multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in instrumented lumbar fusion-a prospective study. In: Surgical neurology. 2008 ; Vol. 70, No. 6. pp. 622-627.
@article{2d0575d1f5a74483b69cd661ada38910,
title = "Single-dose vs multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in instrumented lumbar fusion-a prospective study",
abstract = "Background: This prospective investigation was designed to determine if the postoperative infection rate in instrumented lumbar spinal fusion is affected by postoperative antibiotic use. Methods: Two hundred sixty-nine patients were randomized into either a preoperative only protocol or preoperative with an extended postoperative antibiotic protocol. The preoperative only protocol received a single dose of cefazolin IV. The extended postoperative antibiotic protocol received the same preoperative dose plus postoperative cefazolin IV every 8 hours for 3 days followed by oral cephalexin every 6 hours for 7 days. Because of untoward drug reaction or deviation from the antibiotic protocol, 36 of the 269 patients were eliminated from the study. Therefore, 233 patients completed the entire study. Results: There was no significant difference in infection rates between the 2 antibiotic protocols. The postoperative infection rates were 4.3{\%} for the preoperative only protocol and 1.7{\%} for the preoperative with extended antibiotic protocol. The overall postoperative infection rate was 3{\%}. However, 5 variables of blood transfusion, electrophysiologic monitoring, increased height, increased weight, and increased body mass index appeared to demonstrate a trend toward increase in infection rate. Increased tobacco use trended toward a lower infection rate. Conclusion: Statistical significance was not proven in this prospective study comparing single-dose preoperative antibiotic protocol vs preoperative with an extended postoperative antibiotic protocol. A larger study of 1400 patients would possibly provide more statistically significant information.",
keywords = "Antibiotic prophylaxis, Infection rate, Lumbar spinal fusion",
author = "Hellbusch, {Leslie Carl} and Michele Helzer-Julin and Doran, {Stephen E.} and Leibrock, {Lyal G.} and Long, {Douglas J.} and Puccioni, {Mark J} and Thorell, {William E} and Treves, {John S.}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.surneu.2007.08.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "622--627",
journal = "World Neurosurgery",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single-dose vs multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in instrumented lumbar fusion-a prospective study

AU - Hellbusch, Leslie Carl

AU - Helzer-Julin, Michele

AU - Doran, Stephen E.

AU - Leibrock, Lyal G.

AU - Long, Douglas J.

AU - Puccioni, Mark J

AU - Thorell, William E

AU - Treves, John S.

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - Background: This prospective investigation was designed to determine if the postoperative infection rate in instrumented lumbar spinal fusion is affected by postoperative antibiotic use. Methods: Two hundred sixty-nine patients were randomized into either a preoperative only protocol or preoperative with an extended postoperative antibiotic protocol. The preoperative only protocol received a single dose of cefazolin IV. The extended postoperative antibiotic protocol received the same preoperative dose plus postoperative cefazolin IV every 8 hours for 3 days followed by oral cephalexin every 6 hours for 7 days. Because of untoward drug reaction or deviation from the antibiotic protocol, 36 of the 269 patients were eliminated from the study. Therefore, 233 patients completed the entire study. Results: There was no significant difference in infection rates between the 2 antibiotic protocols. The postoperative infection rates were 4.3% for the preoperative only protocol and 1.7% for the preoperative with extended antibiotic protocol. The overall postoperative infection rate was 3%. However, 5 variables of blood transfusion, electrophysiologic monitoring, increased height, increased weight, and increased body mass index appeared to demonstrate a trend toward increase in infection rate. Increased tobacco use trended toward a lower infection rate. Conclusion: Statistical significance was not proven in this prospective study comparing single-dose preoperative antibiotic protocol vs preoperative with an extended postoperative antibiotic protocol. A larger study of 1400 patients would possibly provide more statistically significant information.

AB - Background: This prospective investigation was designed to determine if the postoperative infection rate in instrumented lumbar spinal fusion is affected by postoperative antibiotic use. Methods: Two hundred sixty-nine patients were randomized into either a preoperative only protocol or preoperative with an extended postoperative antibiotic protocol. The preoperative only protocol received a single dose of cefazolin IV. The extended postoperative antibiotic protocol received the same preoperative dose plus postoperative cefazolin IV every 8 hours for 3 days followed by oral cephalexin every 6 hours for 7 days. Because of untoward drug reaction or deviation from the antibiotic protocol, 36 of the 269 patients were eliminated from the study. Therefore, 233 patients completed the entire study. Results: There was no significant difference in infection rates between the 2 antibiotic protocols. The postoperative infection rates were 4.3% for the preoperative only protocol and 1.7% for the preoperative with extended antibiotic protocol. The overall postoperative infection rate was 3%. However, 5 variables of blood transfusion, electrophysiologic monitoring, increased height, increased weight, and increased body mass index appeared to demonstrate a trend toward increase in infection rate. Increased tobacco use trended toward a lower infection rate. Conclusion: Statistical significance was not proven in this prospective study comparing single-dose preoperative antibiotic protocol vs preoperative with an extended postoperative antibiotic protocol. A larger study of 1400 patients would possibly provide more statistically significant information.

KW - Antibiotic prophylaxis

KW - Infection rate

KW - Lumbar spinal fusion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56949088040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56949088040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.08.017

DO - 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.08.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 18207532

AN - SCOPUS:56949088040

VL - 70

SP - 622

EP - 627

JO - World Neurosurgery

JF - World Neurosurgery

SN - 1878-8750

IS - 6

ER -