Should we fear "flu fear" itself? Effects of H1N1 influenza fear on ED use

William M McDonnell, Douglas S. Nelson, Jeff E. Schunk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Surges in patient volumes compromise emergency departments' (EDs') ability to deliver care, as shown by the recent H1N1 influenza (flu) epidemic. Media reports are important in informing the public about health threats, but the effects of media-induced anxiety on ED volumes are unclear. Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of widespread public concern about flu on ED use. Methods: We reviewed ED data from an integrated health system operating 18 hospital EDs. We compared ED visits during three 1-week periods: (a) a period of heightened public concern regarding flu before the disease was present ("Fear Week"), (b) a subsequent period of active disease ("Flu Week"), and (c) a week before widespread concern ("Control Week"). Fear Week was identified from an analysis of statewide Google electronic searches for "swine flu" and from media announcements about flu. Flu Week was identified from statewide epidemiological data. Results: Data were reviewed from 22 608 visits during the study periods. Fear Week (n = 7712) and Flu Week (n = 7687) were compared to Control Week (n = 7209). Fear Week showed a 7.0% increase in visits (95% confidence interval, 6-8). Pediatric visits increased by 19.7%, whereas adult visits increased by 1%. Flu Week showed an increase over Control Week of 6.6% (95% confidence interval, 6-7). Pediatric visits increased by 10.6%, whereas adult visits increased by 4.8%. Conclusion: At a time of heightened public concern regarding flu but little disease prevalence, EDs experienced substantial increases in patient volumes. These increases were significant and comparable to the increases experienced during the subsequent epidemic of actual disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275-282
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2012

Fingerprint

Human Influenza
Fear
Confidence Intervals
Pediatrics
Aptitude
Cerebral Palsy
Hospital Emergency Service
Swine
Anxiety
Public Health
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Should we fear "flu fear" itself? Effects of H1N1 influenza fear on ED use. / McDonnell, William M; Nelson, Douglas S.; Schunk, Jeff E.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 2, 01.02.2012, p. 275-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McDonnell, William M ; Nelson, Douglas S. ; Schunk, Jeff E. / Should we fear "flu fear" itself? Effects of H1N1 influenza fear on ED use. In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 275-282.
@article{1aee70d8ddf942309ccfa6da8986a954,
title = "Should we fear {"}flu fear{"} itself? Effects of H1N1 influenza fear on ED use",
abstract = "Background: Surges in patient volumes compromise emergency departments' (EDs') ability to deliver care, as shown by the recent H1N1 influenza (flu) epidemic. Media reports are important in informing the public about health threats, but the effects of media-induced anxiety on ED volumes are unclear. Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of widespread public concern about flu on ED use. Methods: We reviewed ED data from an integrated health system operating 18 hospital EDs. We compared ED visits during three 1-week periods: (a) a period of heightened public concern regarding flu before the disease was present ({"}Fear Week{"}), (b) a subsequent period of active disease ({"}Flu Week{"}), and (c) a week before widespread concern ({"}Control Week{"}). Fear Week was identified from an analysis of statewide Google electronic searches for {"}swine flu{"} and from media announcements about flu. Flu Week was identified from statewide epidemiological data. Results: Data were reviewed from 22 608 visits during the study periods. Fear Week (n = 7712) and Flu Week (n = 7687) were compared to Control Week (n = 7209). Fear Week showed a 7.0{\%} increase in visits (95{\%} confidence interval, 6-8). Pediatric visits increased by 19.7{\%}, whereas adult visits increased by 1{\%}. Flu Week showed an increase over Control Week of 6.6{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval, 6-7). Pediatric visits increased by 10.6{\%}, whereas adult visits increased by 4.8{\%}. Conclusion: At a time of heightened public concern regarding flu but little disease prevalence, EDs experienced substantial increases in patient volumes. These increases were significant and comparable to the increases experienced during the subsequent epidemic of actual disease.",
author = "McDonnell, {William M} and Nelson, {Douglas S.} and Schunk, {Jeff E.}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2010.11.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "275--282",
journal = "The American journal of emergency medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should we fear "flu fear" itself? Effects of H1N1 influenza fear on ED use

AU - McDonnell, William M

AU - Nelson, Douglas S.

AU - Schunk, Jeff E.

PY - 2012/2/1

Y1 - 2012/2/1

N2 - Background: Surges in patient volumes compromise emergency departments' (EDs') ability to deliver care, as shown by the recent H1N1 influenza (flu) epidemic. Media reports are important in informing the public about health threats, but the effects of media-induced anxiety on ED volumes are unclear. Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of widespread public concern about flu on ED use. Methods: We reviewed ED data from an integrated health system operating 18 hospital EDs. We compared ED visits during three 1-week periods: (a) a period of heightened public concern regarding flu before the disease was present ("Fear Week"), (b) a subsequent period of active disease ("Flu Week"), and (c) a week before widespread concern ("Control Week"). Fear Week was identified from an analysis of statewide Google electronic searches for "swine flu" and from media announcements about flu. Flu Week was identified from statewide epidemiological data. Results: Data were reviewed from 22 608 visits during the study periods. Fear Week (n = 7712) and Flu Week (n = 7687) were compared to Control Week (n = 7209). Fear Week showed a 7.0% increase in visits (95% confidence interval, 6-8). Pediatric visits increased by 19.7%, whereas adult visits increased by 1%. Flu Week showed an increase over Control Week of 6.6% (95% confidence interval, 6-7). Pediatric visits increased by 10.6%, whereas adult visits increased by 4.8%. Conclusion: At a time of heightened public concern regarding flu but little disease prevalence, EDs experienced substantial increases in patient volumes. These increases were significant and comparable to the increases experienced during the subsequent epidemic of actual disease.

AB - Background: Surges in patient volumes compromise emergency departments' (EDs') ability to deliver care, as shown by the recent H1N1 influenza (flu) epidemic. Media reports are important in informing the public about health threats, but the effects of media-induced anxiety on ED volumes are unclear. Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of widespread public concern about flu on ED use. Methods: We reviewed ED data from an integrated health system operating 18 hospital EDs. We compared ED visits during three 1-week periods: (a) a period of heightened public concern regarding flu before the disease was present ("Fear Week"), (b) a subsequent period of active disease ("Flu Week"), and (c) a week before widespread concern ("Control Week"). Fear Week was identified from an analysis of statewide Google electronic searches for "swine flu" and from media announcements about flu. Flu Week was identified from statewide epidemiological data. Results: Data were reviewed from 22 608 visits during the study periods. Fear Week (n = 7712) and Flu Week (n = 7687) were compared to Control Week (n = 7209). Fear Week showed a 7.0% increase in visits (95% confidence interval, 6-8). Pediatric visits increased by 19.7%, whereas adult visits increased by 1%. Flu Week showed an increase over Control Week of 6.6% (95% confidence interval, 6-7). Pediatric visits increased by 10.6%, whereas adult visits increased by 4.8%. Conclusion: At a time of heightened public concern regarding flu but little disease prevalence, EDs experienced substantial increases in patient volumes. These increases were significant and comparable to the increases experienced during the subsequent epidemic of actual disease.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856525810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856525810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.11.027

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.11.027

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 275

EP - 282

JO - The American journal of emergency medicine

JF - The American journal of emergency medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 2

ER -