Should intestinal continuity be restored after massive intestinal resection?

Baolien T. Nguyen, Garnet J. Blatchford, Jon S Thompson, Larry E. Bragg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We reviewed our experience with 32 patients who underwent massive intestinal resection to determine when intestinal continuity should be maintained. An enterostomy was created in 21 patients (66 percent) at the initial resection because of questionable bowel viability and an unstable condition or the need for colonic anastomosis. Intestinal continuity was restored in only 20 percent of these patients. In 11 patients (34 percent), intestinal continuity was maintained at the time of resection. Only four of these patients (36 percent) had a satisfactory long-term outcome. Overall, intestinal continuity was maintained in 10 of the 22 patients (45 percent) followed over the long-term. Three quarters of patients with intestinal remnants shorter than 3 feet had an enterostomy. We believe intestinal continuity should be restored at the time of massive resection only in carefully selected patients when bowel viability is ensured, remnant length is greater than 3 feet, and a colonic anastomosis is not required. Maintaining intestinal continuity eliminates the inconvenience of the stoma but may cause dietary restriction and perianal discomfort.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)577-580
Number of pages4
JournalThe American Journal of Surgery
Volume158
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1989

Fingerprint

Enterostomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Should intestinal continuity be restored after massive intestinal resection? / Nguyen, Baolien T.; Blatchford, Garnet J.; Thompson, Jon S; Bragg, Larry E.

In: The American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 158, No. 6, 01.01.1989, p. 577-580.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nguyen, Baolien T. ; Blatchford, Garnet J. ; Thompson, Jon S ; Bragg, Larry E. / Should intestinal continuity be restored after massive intestinal resection?. In: The American Journal of Surgery. 1989 ; Vol. 158, No. 6. pp. 577-580.
@article{cfa3f81328404857bf289ccc1b40a81f,
title = "Should intestinal continuity be restored after massive intestinal resection?",
abstract = "We reviewed our experience with 32 patients who underwent massive intestinal resection to determine when intestinal continuity should be maintained. An enterostomy was created in 21 patients (66 percent) at the initial resection because of questionable bowel viability and an unstable condition or the need for colonic anastomosis. Intestinal continuity was restored in only 20 percent of these patients. In 11 patients (34 percent), intestinal continuity was maintained at the time of resection. Only four of these patients (36 percent) had a satisfactory long-term outcome. Overall, intestinal continuity was maintained in 10 of the 22 patients (45 percent) followed over the long-term. Three quarters of patients with intestinal remnants shorter than 3 feet had an enterostomy. We believe intestinal continuity should be restored at the time of massive resection only in carefully selected patients when bowel viability is ensured, remnant length is greater than 3 feet, and a colonic anastomosis is not required. Maintaining intestinal continuity eliminates the inconvenience of the stoma but may cause dietary restriction and perianal discomfort.",
author = "Nguyen, {Baolien T.} and Blatchford, {Garnet J.} and Thompson, {Jon S} and Bragg, {Larry E.}",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9610(89)90197-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "158",
pages = "577--580",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should intestinal continuity be restored after massive intestinal resection?

AU - Nguyen, Baolien T.

AU - Blatchford, Garnet J.

AU - Thompson, Jon S

AU - Bragg, Larry E.

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - We reviewed our experience with 32 patients who underwent massive intestinal resection to determine when intestinal continuity should be maintained. An enterostomy was created in 21 patients (66 percent) at the initial resection because of questionable bowel viability and an unstable condition or the need for colonic anastomosis. Intestinal continuity was restored in only 20 percent of these patients. In 11 patients (34 percent), intestinal continuity was maintained at the time of resection. Only four of these patients (36 percent) had a satisfactory long-term outcome. Overall, intestinal continuity was maintained in 10 of the 22 patients (45 percent) followed over the long-term. Three quarters of patients with intestinal remnants shorter than 3 feet had an enterostomy. We believe intestinal continuity should be restored at the time of massive resection only in carefully selected patients when bowel viability is ensured, remnant length is greater than 3 feet, and a colonic anastomosis is not required. Maintaining intestinal continuity eliminates the inconvenience of the stoma but may cause dietary restriction and perianal discomfort.

AB - We reviewed our experience with 32 patients who underwent massive intestinal resection to determine when intestinal continuity should be maintained. An enterostomy was created in 21 patients (66 percent) at the initial resection because of questionable bowel viability and an unstable condition or the need for colonic anastomosis. Intestinal continuity was restored in only 20 percent of these patients. In 11 patients (34 percent), intestinal continuity was maintained at the time of resection. Only four of these patients (36 percent) had a satisfactory long-term outcome. Overall, intestinal continuity was maintained in 10 of the 22 patients (45 percent) followed over the long-term. Three quarters of patients with intestinal remnants shorter than 3 feet had an enterostomy. We believe intestinal continuity should be restored at the time of massive resection only in carefully selected patients when bowel viability is ensured, remnant length is greater than 3 feet, and a colonic anastomosis is not required. Maintaining intestinal continuity eliminates the inconvenience of the stoma but may cause dietary restriction and perianal discomfort.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024802622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024802622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90197-9

DO - 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90197-9

M3 - Article

VL - 158

SP - 577

EP - 580

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 6

ER -