Should IACUCs review scientific merit of animal research projects?

Michael D. Mann, Ernest D. Prentice

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whether IACUCs should review animal research protocols for scientific merit is not addressed in the federal regulations, resulting in ongoing confusion on the subject. The authors examine this issue, discuss the pros and cons, suggest how IACUCs can go about reviewing protocols for scientific merit, and question what effect recent changes in regulations will have on this issue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)26-31
Number of pages6
JournalLab Animal
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2004

Fingerprint

Animal Care Committees
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
animal research
research projects
Animals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Should IACUCs review scientific merit of animal research projects? / Mann, Michael D.; Prentice, Ernest D.

In: Lab Animal, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.2004, p. 26-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Mann, Michael D. ; Prentice, Ernest D. / Should IACUCs review scientific merit of animal research projects?. In: Lab Animal. 2004 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 26-31.
@article{d2d263c32c0f4f8d944f330e3918eff8,
title = "Should IACUCs review scientific merit of animal research projects?",
abstract = "Whether IACUCs should review animal research protocols for scientific merit is not addressed in the federal regulations, resulting in ongoing confusion on the subject. The authors examine this issue, discuss the pros and cons, suggest how IACUCs can go about reviewing protocols for scientific merit, and question what effect recent changes in regulations will have on this issue.",
author = "Mann, {Michael D.} and Prentice, {Ernest D.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1038/laban0104-26",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "26--31",
journal = "Lab Animal",
issn = "0093-7355",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should IACUCs review scientific merit of animal research projects?

AU - Mann, Michael D.

AU - Prentice, Ernest D.

PY - 2004/1

Y1 - 2004/1

N2 - Whether IACUCs should review animal research protocols for scientific merit is not addressed in the federal regulations, resulting in ongoing confusion on the subject. The authors examine this issue, discuss the pros and cons, suggest how IACUCs can go about reviewing protocols for scientific merit, and question what effect recent changes in regulations will have on this issue.

AB - Whether IACUCs should review animal research protocols for scientific merit is not addressed in the federal regulations, resulting in ongoing confusion on the subject. The authors examine this issue, discuss the pros and cons, suggest how IACUCs can go about reviewing protocols for scientific merit, and question what effect recent changes in regulations will have on this issue.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2942545729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2942545729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/laban0104-26

DO - 10.1038/laban0104-26

M3 - Review article

C2 - 14752528

AN - SCOPUS:2942545729

VL - 33

SP - 26

EP - 31

JO - Lab Animal

JF - Lab Animal

SN - 0093-7355

IS - 1

ER -