Short-term memory loss over time without retroactive stimulus interference

Nelson Cowan, Angela M AuBuchon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A key question in cognitive psychology is whether information in short-term memory is lost as a function of time. Lewandowsky, Duncan, and Brown (2004) argued against that memory loss because forgetting in serial recall occurred to the same extent across serial positions regardless of the rate of recall. However, we believe Lewandowsky et al. (2004) only prevented one of two types of rehearsal; they did not prevent nonarticulatory rehearsal via attention. To prevent articulatory and nonarticulatory rehearsal without introducing interference, we presented unevenly timed stimuli for serial recall and, on some trials, required that the timing of stimuli be reproduced in the response. In those trials only, evidence of memory loss over time emerged. Further research is needed to identify whether this memory loss is decay or lost distinctiveness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)230-235
Number of pages6
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2008

Fingerprint

Memory Disorders
Short-Term Memory
Psychology
Research
Short-term Memory
Interference
Rehearsal
Stimulus
Serial Recall

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Short-term memory loss over time without retroactive stimulus interference. / Cowan, Nelson; AuBuchon, Angela M.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.02.2008, p. 230-235.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3f68b173e01840dd939637ec4a10a590,
title = "Short-term memory loss over time without retroactive stimulus interference",
abstract = "A key question in cognitive psychology is whether information in short-term memory is lost as a function of time. Lewandowsky, Duncan, and Brown (2004) argued against that memory loss because forgetting in serial recall occurred to the same extent across serial positions regardless of the rate of recall. However, we believe Lewandowsky et al. (2004) only prevented one of two types of rehearsal; they did not prevent nonarticulatory rehearsal via attention. To prevent articulatory and nonarticulatory rehearsal without introducing interference, we presented unevenly timed stimuli for serial recall and, on some trials, required that the timing of stimuli be reproduced in the response. In those trials only, evidence of memory loss over time emerged. Further research is needed to identify whether this memory loss is decay or lost distinctiveness.",
author = "Nelson Cowan and AuBuchon, {Angela M}",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/PBR.15.1.230",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "230--235",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Short-term memory loss over time without retroactive stimulus interference

AU - Cowan, Nelson

AU - AuBuchon, Angela M

PY - 2008/2/1

Y1 - 2008/2/1

N2 - A key question in cognitive psychology is whether information in short-term memory is lost as a function of time. Lewandowsky, Duncan, and Brown (2004) argued against that memory loss because forgetting in serial recall occurred to the same extent across serial positions regardless of the rate of recall. However, we believe Lewandowsky et al. (2004) only prevented one of two types of rehearsal; they did not prevent nonarticulatory rehearsal via attention. To prevent articulatory and nonarticulatory rehearsal without introducing interference, we presented unevenly timed stimuli for serial recall and, on some trials, required that the timing of stimuli be reproduced in the response. In those trials only, evidence of memory loss over time emerged. Further research is needed to identify whether this memory loss is decay or lost distinctiveness.

AB - A key question in cognitive psychology is whether information in short-term memory is lost as a function of time. Lewandowsky, Duncan, and Brown (2004) argued against that memory loss because forgetting in serial recall occurred to the same extent across serial positions regardless of the rate of recall. However, we believe Lewandowsky et al. (2004) only prevented one of two types of rehearsal; they did not prevent nonarticulatory rehearsal via attention. To prevent articulatory and nonarticulatory rehearsal without introducing interference, we presented unevenly timed stimuli for serial recall and, on some trials, required that the timing of stimuli be reproduced in the response. In those trials only, evidence of memory loss over time emerged. Further research is needed to identify whether this memory loss is decay or lost distinctiveness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43049179325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43049179325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/PBR.15.1.230

DO - 10.3758/PBR.15.1.230

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 230

EP - 235

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 1

ER -