Shifting the paradigm: An assessment of the quality of fall risk reduction in Nebraska hospitals

Katherine J. Jones, Dawn Venema, Regina Nailon, Anne M Skinner, Robin High, Victoria L Kennel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the prevalence of evidence-based fall risk reduction structures and processes in Nebraska hospitals; whether fall rates are associated with specific structures and processes; and whether fall risk reduction structures, processes, and outcomes vary by hospital type-Critical Access Hospital (CAH) versus non-CAH. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of Nebraska's 83 general community hospitals, 78% of which are CAHs. We used a negative binomial rate model to estimate fall rates while adjusting for hospital volume (patient days) and the exact Pearson chi-square test to determine associations between hospital type and the structure and process of fall risk reduction. Findings: Approximately two-thirds or more of 70 hospitals used 6 of 9 evidence-based universal fall risk reduction interventions; 50% or more used 14 of 16 evidence-based targeted interventions. After adjusting for hospital volume, hospitals in which teams integrated evidence from multiple disciplines and reflected upon data and modified polices/procedures based upon data had significantly lower total and injurious fall rates per 1,000 patient days than hospitals that did not. Non-CAHs were significantly more likely than CAHs to perform 5 organizational-level fall risk reduction processes. CAHs reported significantly greater total (5.9 vs 4.0) and injurious (1.7 vs 0.9) fall rates per 1,000 patient days than did non-CAHs. Conclusions: Hospital type was a significant predictor of fall rates. However, shifting the paradigm for fall risk reduction from a nursing-centric approach to one in which teams implement evidence-based practices and learn from data may decrease fall risk regardless of hospital type.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)135-145
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Rural Health
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

Risk Reduction Behavior
Evidence-Based Practice
Community Hospital
Police
Statistical Models
Chi-Square Distribution
General Hospitals
Nursing
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Critical access hospitals
  • Organizational learning
  • Patient falls
  • Quality
  • Teamwork

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Shifting the paradigm : An assessment of the quality of fall risk reduction in Nebraska hospitals. / Jones, Katherine J.; Venema, Dawn; Nailon, Regina; Skinner, Anne M; High, Robin; Kennel, Victoria L.

In: Journal of Rural Health, Vol. 31, No. 2, 01.03.2015, p. 135-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{62d7545a60a34722aab3f0264cb67fcb,
title = "Shifting the paradigm: An assessment of the quality of fall risk reduction in Nebraska hospitals",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the prevalence of evidence-based fall risk reduction structures and processes in Nebraska hospitals; whether fall rates are associated with specific structures and processes; and whether fall risk reduction structures, processes, and outcomes vary by hospital type-Critical Access Hospital (CAH) versus non-CAH. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of Nebraska's 83 general community hospitals, 78{\%} of which are CAHs. We used a negative binomial rate model to estimate fall rates while adjusting for hospital volume (patient days) and the exact Pearson chi-square test to determine associations between hospital type and the structure and process of fall risk reduction. Findings: Approximately two-thirds or more of 70 hospitals used 6 of 9 evidence-based universal fall risk reduction interventions; 50{\%} or more used 14 of 16 evidence-based targeted interventions. After adjusting for hospital volume, hospitals in which teams integrated evidence from multiple disciplines and reflected upon data and modified polices/procedures based upon data had significantly lower total and injurious fall rates per 1,000 patient days than hospitals that did not. Non-CAHs were significantly more likely than CAHs to perform 5 organizational-level fall risk reduction processes. CAHs reported significantly greater total (5.9 vs 4.0) and injurious (1.7 vs 0.9) fall rates per 1,000 patient days than did non-CAHs. Conclusions: Hospital type was a significant predictor of fall rates. However, shifting the paradigm for fall risk reduction from a nursing-centric approach to one in which teams implement evidence-based practices and learn from data may decrease fall risk regardless of hospital type.",
keywords = "Critical access hospitals, Organizational learning, Patient falls, Quality, Teamwork",
author = "Jones, {Katherine J.} and Dawn Venema and Regina Nailon and Skinner, {Anne M} and Robin High and Kennel, {Victoria L}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jrh.12088",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "135--145",
journal = "Journal of Rural Health",
issn = "0890-765X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shifting the paradigm

T2 - An assessment of the quality of fall risk reduction in Nebraska hospitals

AU - Jones, Katherine J.

AU - Venema, Dawn

AU - Nailon, Regina

AU - Skinner, Anne M

AU - High, Robin

AU - Kennel, Victoria L

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Purpose: To assess the prevalence of evidence-based fall risk reduction structures and processes in Nebraska hospitals; whether fall rates are associated with specific structures and processes; and whether fall risk reduction structures, processes, and outcomes vary by hospital type-Critical Access Hospital (CAH) versus non-CAH. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of Nebraska's 83 general community hospitals, 78% of which are CAHs. We used a negative binomial rate model to estimate fall rates while adjusting for hospital volume (patient days) and the exact Pearson chi-square test to determine associations between hospital type and the structure and process of fall risk reduction. Findings: Approximately two-thirds or more of 70 hospitals used 6 of 9 evidence-based universal fall risk reduction interventions; 50% or more used 14 of 16 evidence-based targeted interventions. After adjusting for hospital volume, hospitals in which teams integrated evidence from multiple disciplines and reflected upon data and modified polices/procedures based upon data had significantly lower total and injurious fall rates per 1,000 patient days than hospitals that did not. Non-CAHs were significantly more likely than CAHs to perform 5 organizational-level fall risk reduction processes. CAHs reported significantly greater total (5.9 vs 4.0) and injurious (1.7 vs 0.9) fall rates per 1,000 patient days than did non-CAHs. Conclusions: Hospital type was a significant predictor of fall rates. However, shifting the paradigm for fall risk reduction from a nursing-centric approach to one in which teams implement evidence-based practices and learn from data may decrease fall risk regardless of hospital type.

AB - Purpose: To assess the prevalence of evidence-based fall risk reduction structures and processes in Nebraska hospitals; whether fall rates are associated with specific structures and processes; and whether fall risk reduction structures, processes, and outcomes vary by hospital type-Critical Access Hospital (CAH) versus non-CAH. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of Nebraska's 83 general community hospitals, 78% of which are CAHs. We used a negative binomial rate model to estimate fall rates while adjusting for hospital volume (patient days) and the exact Pearson chi-square test to determine associations between hospital type and the structure and process of fall risk reduction. Findings: Approximately two-thirds or more of 70 hospitals used 6 of 9 evidence-based universal fall risk reduction interventions; 50% or more used 14 of 16 evidence-based targeted interventions. After adjusting for hospital volume, hospitals in which teams integrated evidence from multiple disciplines and reflected upon data and modified polices/procedures based upon data had significantly lower total and injurious fall rates per 1,000 patient days than hospitals that did not. Non-CAHs were significantly more likely than CAHs to perform 5 organizational-level fall risk reduction processes. CAHs reported significantly greater total (5.9 vs 4.0) and injurious (1.7 vs 0.9) fall rates per 1,000 patient days than did non-CAHs. Conclusions: Hospital type was a significant predictor of fall rates. However, shifting the paradigm for fall risk reduction from a nursing-centric approach to one in which teams implement evidence-based practices and learn from data may decrease fall risk regardless of hospital type.

KW - Critical access hospitals

KW - Organizational learning

KW - Patient falls

KW - Quality

KW - Teamwork

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925940493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925940493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jrh.12088

DO - 10.1111/jrh.12088

M3 - Article

C2 - 25182938

AN - SCOPUS:84925940493

VL - 31

SP - 135

EP - 145

JO - Journal of Rural Health

JF - Journal of Rural Health

SN - 0890-765X

IS - 2

ER -