Sex Differences in the Predictors of Prisoner Misconduct

Benjamin Steiner, John Wooldredge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study involved a comparison of the influences on inmate misconduct among female and male inmates. Data were collected from over 5,500 inmates housed in 46 facilities in Ohio and Kentucky (570 women and 5,059 men), and the relative effects of these inmates' background characteristics and confinement experiences were examined for sex-specific samples. The magnitudes of effects were then compared across the two groups. Findings revealed that background characteristics (e.g., age) and confinement experiences (e.g., involvement in education/vocational program) influence women's and men's odds of misconduct. Equality of coefficient tests revealed only three differences in the magnitude of these effects across the analyses of the sex-specific samples, suggesting there are far more similarities than differences in the predictors of misconduct among men versus women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)433-452
Number of pages20
JournalCriminal Justice and Behavior
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2014

Fingerprint

Prisoners
prisoner
Sex Characteristics
Vocational Education
equality
experience
Group

Keywords

  • gender
  • inmate
  • misconduct
  • prison
  • sex

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychology(all)
  • Law

Cite this

Sex Differences in the Predictors of Prisoner Misconduct. / Steiner, Benjamin; Wooldredge, John.

In: Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 41, No. 4, 04.2014, p. 433-452.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{04dcb36154784fb6bc3a3b11db9368a9,
title = "Sex Differences in the Predictors of Prisoner Misconduct",
abstract = "This study involved a comparison of the influences on inmate misconduct among female and male inmates. Data were collected from over 5,500 inmates housed in 46 facilities in Ohio and Kentucky (570 women and 5,059 men), and the relative effects of these inmates' background characteristics and confinement experiences were examined for sex-specific samples. The magnitudes of effects were then compared across the two groups. Findings revealed that background characteristics (e.g., age) and confinement experiences (e.g., involvement in education/vocational program) influence women's and men's odds of misconduct. Equality of coefficient tests revealed only three differences in the magnitude of these effects across the analyses of the sex-specific samples, suggesting there are far more similarities than differences in the predictors of misconduct among men versus women.",
keywords = "gender, inmate, misconduct, prison, sex",
author = "Benjamin Steiner and John Wooldredge",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0093854813504404",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "433--452",
journal = "Criminal Justice and Behavior",
issn = "0093-8548",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex Differences in the Predictors of Prisoner Misconduct

AU - Steiner, Benjamin

AU - Wooldredge, John

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - This study involved a comparison of the influences on inmate misconduct among female and male inmates. Data were collected from over 5,500 inmates housed in 46 facilities in Ohio and Kentucky (570 women and 5,059 men), and the relative effects of these inmates' background characteristics and confinement experiences were examined for sex-specific samples. The magnitudes of effects were then compared across the two groups. Findings revealed that background characteristics (e.g., age) and confinement experiences (e.g., involvement in education/vocational program) influence women's and men's odds of misconduct. Equality of coefficient tests revealed only three differences in the magnitude of these effects across the analyses of the sex-specific samples, suggesting there are far more similarities than differences in the predictors of misconduct among men versus women.

AB - This study involved a comparison of the influences on inmate misconduct among female and male inmates. Data were collected from over 5,500 inmates housed in 46 facilities in Ohio and Kentucky (570 women and 5,059 men), and the relative effects of these inmates' background characteristics and confinement experiences were examined for sex-specific samples. The magnitudes of effects were then compared across the two groups. Findings revealed that background characteristics (e.g., age) and confinement experiences (e.g., involvement in education/vocational program) influence women's and men's odds of misconduct. Equality of coefficient tests revealed only three differences in the magnitude of these effects across the analyses of the sex-specific samples, suggesting there are far more similarities than differences in the predictors of misconduct among men versus women.

KW - gender

KW - inmate

KW - misconduct

KW - prison

KW - sex

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897802246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897802246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0093854813504404

DO - 10.1177/0093854813504404

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84897802246

VL - 41

SP - 433

EP - 452

JO - Criminal Justice and Behavior

JF - Criminal Justice and Behavior

SN - 0093-8548

IS - 4

ER -