Sex-Based Disparities in Pretrial Release Decisions and Outcomes

Gillian M. Pinchevsky, Benjamin Steiner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study involved an examination of sex-based differences in judicial decision making during pretrial, an understudied stage of the criminal court process. We also examined whether defendants’ sex interacted with other legal and extralegal case characteristics, or the context of the county in which defendants were processed. Analyses of data collected from 62 large urban counties for the years 1994 through 2006 revealed that overall, women were treated more leniently than men throughout the pretrial process. Results also indicated that defendants’ sex interacted with other case characteristics to influence pretrial decisions and outcomes, and that judicial decisions were shaped by the sociopolitical context of the county in which these defendants were processed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)308-340
Number of pages33
JournalCrime and Delinquency
Volume62
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Sex Characteristics
Decision Making
decision making
examination

Keywords

  • court community
  • focal concerns
  • pretrial
  • sex-based disparities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Sex-Based Disparities in Pretrial Release Decisions and Outcomes. / Pinchevsky, Gillian M.; Steiner, Benjamin.

In: Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 62, No. 3, 01.03.2016, p. 308-340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{797f388c5fe24d019bcbdbff42c1dc1e,
title = "Sex-Based Disparities in Pretrial Release Decisions and Outcomes",
abstract = "This study involved an examination of sex-based differences in judicial decision making during pretrial, an understudied stage of the criminal court process. We also examined whether defendants’ sex interacted with other legal and extralegal case characteristics, or the context of the county in which defendants were processed. Analyses of data collected from 62 large urban counties for the years 1994 through 2006 revealed that overall, women were treated more leniently than men throughout the pretrial process. Results also indicated that defendants’ sex interacted with other case characteristics to influence pretrial decisions and outcomes, and that judicial decisions were shaped by the sociopolitical context of the county in which these defendants were processed.",
keywords = "court community, focal concerns, pretrial, sex-based disparities",
author = "Pinchevsky, {Gillian M.} and Benjamin Steiner",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0011128713482415",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "308--340",
journal = "Crime and Delinquency",
issn = "0011-1287",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex-Based Disparities in Pretrial Release Decisions and Outcomes

AU - Pinchevsky, Gillian M.

AU - Steiner, Benjamin

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - This study involved an examination of sex-based differences in judicial decision making during pretrial, an understudied stage of the criminal court process. We also examined whether defendants’ sex interacted with other legal and extralegal case characteristics, or the context of the county in which defendants were processed. Analyses of data collected from 62 large urban counties for the years 1994 through 2006 revealed that overall, women were treated more leniently than men throughout the pretrial process. Results also indicated that defendants’ sex interacted with other case characteristics to influence pretrial decisions and outcomes, and that judicial decisions were shaped by the sociopolitical context of the county in which these defendants were processed.

AB - This study involved an examination of sex-based differences in judicial decision making during pretrial, an understudied stage of the criminal court process. We also examined whether defendants’ sex interacted with other legal and extralegal case characteristics, or the context of the county in which defendants were processed. Analyses of data collected from 62 large urban counties for the years 1994 through 2006 revealed that overall, women were treated more leniently than men throughout the pretrial process. Results also indicated that defendants’ sex interacted with other case characteristics to influence pretrial decisions and outcomes, and that judicial decisions were shaped by the sociopolitical context of the county in which these defendants were processed.

KW - court community

KW - focal concerns

KW - pretrial

KW - sex-based disparities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958214012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958214012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0011128713482415

DO - 10.1177/0011128713482415

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84958214012

VL - 62

SP - 308

EP - 340

JO - Crime and Delinquency

JF - Crime and Delinquency

SN - 0011-1287

IS - 3

ER -