Setup uncertainties in linear accelerator based stereotactic radiosurgery and a derivation of the corresponding setup margin for treatment planning

Mutian Zhang, Qinghui Zhang, Hua Gan, Sicong Li, Sumin Zhou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: In the present study, clinical stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) setup uncertainties from image-guidance data are analyzed, and the corresponding setup margin is estimated for treatment planning purposes. Methods: Patients undergoing single-fraction SRS at our institution were localized using invasive head ring or non-invasive thermoplastic masks. Setup discrepancies were obtained from an in-room x-ray patient position monitoring system. Post treatment re-planning using the measured setup errors was performed in order to estimate the individual target margins sufficient to compensate for the actual setup errors. The formula of setup margin for a general SRS patient population was derived by proposing a correlation between the three-dimensional setup error and the required minimal margin. Results: Setup errors of 104 brain lesions were analyzed, in which 81 lesions were treated using an invasive head ring, and 23 were treated using non-invasive masks. In the mask cases with image guidance, the translational setup uncertainties achieved the same level as those in the head ring cases. Re-planning results showed that the margins for individual patients could be smaller than the clinical three-dimensional setup errors. The derivation of setup margin adequate to address the patient setup errors was demonstrated by using the arbitrary planning goal of treating 95% of the lesions with sufficient doses. Conclusions: With image guidance, the patient setup accuracy of mask cases can be comparable to that of invasive head rings. The SRS setup margin can be derived for a patient population with the proposed margin formula to compensate for the institution-specific setup errors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-385
Number of pages7
JournalPhysica Medica
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Particle Accelerators
Radiosurgery
linear accelerators
Uncertainty
planning
margins
derivation
Masks
Head
Therapeutics
masks
lesions
Physiologic Monitoring
Population
rings
X-Rays
Brain

Keywords

  • Linear accelerator
  • Margin
  • Radiosurgery
  • Setup error

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Setup uncertainties in linear accelerator based stereotactic radiosurgery and a derivation of the corresponding setup margin for treatment planning. / Zhang, Mutian; Zhang, Qinghui; Gan, Hua; Li, Sicong; Zhou, Sumin.

In: Physica Medica, Vol. 32, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 379-385.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{665ad533e3df4a69b0fb3769f9135f12,
title = "Setup uncertainties in linear accelerator based stereotactic radiosurgery and a derivation of the corresponding setup margin for treatment planning",
abstract = "Purpose: In the present study, clinical stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) setup uncertainties from image-guidance data are analyzed, and the corresponding setup margin is estimated for treatment planning purposes. Methods: Patients undergoing single-fraction SRS at our institution were localized using invasive head ring or non-invasive thermoplastic masks. Setup discrepancies were obtained from an in-room x-ray patient position monitoring system. Post treatment re-planning using the measured setup errors was performed in order to estimate the individual target margins sufficient to compensate for the actual setup errors. The formula of setup margin for a general SRS patient population was derived by proposing a correlation between the three-dimensional setup error and the required minimal margin. Results: Setup errors of 104 brain lesions were analyzed, in which 81 lesions were treated using an invasive head ring, and 23 were treated using non-invasive masks. In the mask cases with image guidance, the translational setup uncertainties achieved the same level as those in the head ring cases. Re-planning results showed that the margins for individual patients could be smaller than the clinical three-dimensional setup errors. The derivation of setup margin adequate to address the patient setup errors was demonstrated by using the arbitrary planning goal of treating 95{\%} of the lesions with sufficient doses. Conclusions: With image guidance, the patient setup accuracy of mask cases can be comparable to that of invasive head rings. The SRS setup margin can be derived for a patient population with the proposed margin formula to compensate for the institution-specific setup errors.",
keywords = "Linear accelerator, Margin, Radiosurgery, Setup error",
author = "Mutian Zhang and Qinghui Zhang and Hua Gan and Sicong Li and Sumin Zhou",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.02.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "379--385",
journal = "Physica Medica",
issn = "1120-1797",
publisher = "Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Setup uncertainties in linear accelerator based stereotactic radiosurgery and a derivation of the corresponding setup margin for treatment planning

AU - Zhang, Mutian

AU - Zhang, Qinghui

AU - Gan, Hua

AU - Li, Sicong

AU - Zhou, Sumin

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Purpose: In the present study, clinical stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) setup uncertainties from image-guidance data are analyzed, and the corresponding setup margin is estimated for treatment planning purposes. Methods: Patients undergoing single-fraction SRS at our institution were localized using invasive head ring or non-invasive thermoplastic masks. Setup discrepancies were obtained from an in-room x-ray patient position monitoring system. Post treatment re-planning using the measured setup errors was performed in order to estimate the individual target margins sufficient to compensate for the actual setup errors. The formula of setup margin for a general SRS patient population was derived by proposing a correlation between the three-dimensional setup error and the required minimal margin. Results: Setup errors of 104 brain lesions were analyzed, in which 81 lesions were treated using an invasive head ring, and 23 were treated using non-invasive masks. In the mask cases with image guidance, the translational setup uncertainties achieved the same level as those in the head ring cases. Re-planning results showed that the margins for individual patients could be smaller than the clinical three-dimensional setup errors. The derivation of setup margin adequate to address the patient setup errors was demonstrated by using the arbitrary planning goal of treating 95% of the lesions with sufficient doses. Conclusions: With image guidance, the patient setup accuracy of mask cases can be comparable to that of invasive head rings. The SRS setup margin can be derived for a patient population with the proposed margin formula to compensate for the institution-specific setup errors.

AB - Purpose: In the present study, clinical stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) setup uncertainties from image-guidance data are analyzed, and the corresponding setup margin is estimated for treatment planning purposes. Methods: Patients undergoing single-fraction SRS at our institution were localized using invasive head ring or non-invasive thermoplastic masks. Setup discrepancies were obtained from an in-room x-ray patient position monitoring system. Post treatment re-planning using the measured setup errors was performed in order to estimate the individual target margins sufficient to compensate for the actual setup errors. The formula of setup margin for a general SRS patient population was derived by proposing a correlation between the three-dimensional setup error and the required minimal margin. Results: Setup errors of 104 brain lesions were analyzed, in which 81 lesions were treated using an invasive head ring, and 23 were treated using non-invasive masks. In the mask cases with image guidance, the translational setup uncertainties achieved the same level as those in the head ring cases. Re-planning results showed that the margins for individual patients could be smaller than the clinical three-dimensional setup errors. The derivation of setup margin adequate to address the patient setup errors was demonstrated by using the arbitrary planning goal of treating 95% of the lesions with sufficient doses. Conclusions: With image guidance, the patient setup accuracy of mask cases can be comparable to that of invasive head rings. The SRS setup margin can be derived for a patient population with the proposed margin formula to compensate for the institution-specific setup errors.

KW - Linear accelerator

KW - Margin

KW - Radiosurgery

KW - Setup error

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960431656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960431656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.02.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 26896390

AN - SCOPUS:84960431656

VL - 32

SP - 379

EP - 385

JO - Physica Medica

JF - Physica Medica

SN - 1120-1797

IS - 2

ER -