Self-service computerized bibliographic retrieval: A comparison of Colleague and PaperChase, programs that search the MEDLINE data base

Douglas Porter, Robert S. Wigton, Marie A. Reidelbach, Howard L. Bleich, Warner V. Slack

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Results of a study comparing the performance of the Colleague and PaperChase computer systems, designed for searching of the National Library of Medicine's MEDLINE database of biomedical references, are presented. Two matched groups of second-year medical students each received three hours of instruction, one group in Colleague, the other in PaperChase. Each student then attempted ten test searches. The next day the groups were reversed, and each student attempted five additional searches. During the 3.5 hours allocated for searching, users of Colleague attempted 64 test searches and retrieved 376 target references: users of PaperChase attempted 78 searches and retrieved 496. Users of Colleague took a mean of 2.2 minutes and spent a mean of $1.20 to find each target reference: users of PaperChase took 1.6 minutes and spent $0.92. The authors conclude that after limited training, medical students find more references faster and at lower cost with PaperChase than with Colleague.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care
EditorsRobert A. Greenes
PublisherPubl by IEEE
Pages530-534
Number of pages5
ISBN (Print)0818608811
StatePublished - Nov 1 1988
EventProceedings - Twelfth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care - Washington, DC, USA
Duration: Nov 6 1988Nov 9 1988

Publication series

NameProceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care
ISSN (Print)0195-4210

Other

OtherProceedings - Twelfth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care
CityWashington, DC, USA
Period11/6/8811/9/88

Fingerprint

Students
Medicine
Computer systems
Costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Porter, D., Wigton, R. S., Reidelbach, M. A., Bleich, H. L., & Slack, W. V. (1988). Self-service computerized bibliographic retrieval: A comparison of Colleague and PaperChase, programs that search the MEDLINE data base. In R. A. Greenes (Ed.), Proceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care (pp. 530-534). (Proceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care). Publ by IEEE.

Self-service computerized bibliographic retrieval : A comparison of Colleague and PaperChase, programs that search the MEDLINE data base. / Porter, Douglas; Wigton, Robert S.; Reidelbach, Marie A.; Bleich, Howard L.; Slack, Warner V.

Proceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. ed. / Robert A. Greenes. Publ by IEEE, 1988. p. 530-534 (Proceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Porter, D, Wigton, RS, Reidelbach, MA, Bleich, HL & Slack, WV 1988, Self-service computerized bibliographic retrieval: A comparison of Colleague and PaperChase, programs that search the MEDLINE data base. in RA Greenes (ed.), Proceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Proceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Publ by IEEE, pp. 530-534, Proceedings - Twelfth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Washington, DC, USA, 11/6/88.
Porter D, Wigton RS, Reidelbach MA, Bleich HL, Slack WV. Self-service computerized bibliographic retrieval: A comparison of Colleague and PaperChase, programs that search the MEDLINE data base. In Greenes RA, editor, Proceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Publ by IEEE. 1988. p. 530-534. (Proceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care).
Porter, Douglas ; Wigton, Robert S. ; Reidelbach, Marie A. ; Bleich, Howard L. ; Slack, Warner V. / Self-service computerized bibliographic retrieval : A comparison of Colleague and PaperChase, programs that search the MEDLINE data base. Proceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. editor / Robert A. Greenes. Publ by IEEE, 1988. pp. 530-534 (Proceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care).
@inproceedings{f4876e821c444aeba8af056c8115b5f1,
title = "Self-service computerized bibliographic retrieval: A comparison of Colleague and PaperChase, programs that search the MEDLINE data base",
abstract = "Results of a study comparing the performance of the Colleague and PaperChase computer systems, designed for searching of the National Library of Medicine's MEDLINE database of biomedical references, are presented. Two matched groups of second-year medical students each received three hours of instruction, one group in Colleague, the other in PaperChase. Each student then attempted ten test searches. The next day the groups were reversed, and each student attempted five additional searches. During the 3.5 hours allocated for searching, users of Colleague attempted 64 test searches and retrieved 376 target references: users of PaperChase attempted 78 searches and retrieved 496. Users of Colleague took a mean of 2.2 minutes and spent a mean of $1.20 to find each target reference: users of PaperChase took 1.6 minutes and spent $0.92. The authors conclude that after limited training, medical students find more references faster and at lower cost with PaperChase than with Colleague.",
author = "Douglas Porter and Wigton, {Robert S.} and Reidelbach, {Marie A.} and Bleich, {Howard L.} and Slack, {Warner V.}",
year = "1988",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0818608811",
series = "Proceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care",
publisher = "Publ by IEEE",
pages = "530--534",
editor = "Greenes, {Robert A.}",
booktitle = "Proceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Self-service computerized bibliographic retrieval

T2 - A comparison of Colleague and PaperChase, programs that search the MEDLINE data base

AU - Porter, Douglas

AU - Wigton, Robert S.

AU - Reidelbach, Marie A.

AU - Bleich, Howard L.

AU - Slack, Warner V.

PY - 1988/11/1

Y1 - 1988/11/1

N2 - Results of a study comparing the performance of the Colleague and PaperChase computer systems, designed for searching of the National Library of Medicine's MEDLINE database of biomedical references, are presented. Two matched groups of second-year medical students each received three hours of instruction, one group in Colleague, the other in PaperChase. Each student then attempted ten test searches. The next day the groups were reversed, and each student attempted five additional searches. During the 3.5 hours allocated for searching, users of Colleague attempted 64 test searches and retrieved 376 target references: users of PaperChase attempted 78 searches and retrieved 496. Users of Colleague took a mean of 2.2 minutes and spent a mean of $1.20 to find each target reference: users of PaperChase took 1.6 minutes and spent $0.92. The authors conclude that after limited training, medical students find more references faster and at lower cost with PaperChase than with Colleague.

AB - Results of a study comparing the performance of the Colleague and PaperChase computer systems, designed for searching of the National Library of Medicine's MEDLINE database of biomedical references, are presented. Two matched groups of second-year medical students each received three hours of instruction, one group in Colleague, the other in PaperChase. Each student then attempted ten test searches. The next day the groups were reversed, and each student attempted five additional searches. During the 3.5 hours allocated for searching, users of Colleague attempted 64 test searches and retrieved 376 target references: users of PaperChase attempted 78 searches and retrieved 496. Users of Colleague took a mean of 2.2 minutes and spent a mean of $1.20 to find each target reference: users of PaperChase took 1.6 minutes and spent $0.92. The authors conclude that after limited training, medical students find more references faster and at lower cost with PaperChase than with Colleague.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024111605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024111605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:0024111605

SN - 0818608811

T3 - Proceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care

SP - 530

EP - 534

BT - Proceedings - Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care

A2 - Greenes, Robert A.

PB - Publ by IEEE

ER -